本文選題：王鳴盛 + 《新唐書》��； 參考：《上海師范大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：清乾嘉年間是我國古代歷史考據學興盛的時期,考據人才輩出,王鳴盛就是其中杰出的代表之一,他與錢大昕、趙翼并稱為乾嘉三大考史學家。王鳴盛對唐代歷史的研究有著重要的貢獻,首先表現(xiàn)為對新、舊《唐書》的研究取得了較大的成就。王鳴盛對兩《唐書》的史料來源、編撰體例、內容、書法等作了詳細的考辨,總結出了兩書編撰上的優(yōu)劣得失;他還對兩《唐書》的文本作了細致的�？�,糾正了兩書文字上的錯訛、脫漏和衍羨;他考證兩《唐書》的方法主要有歸納法、比較法、碑史互證法等,其中碑史互證法是其考史的一大特色,這些方法在其考證兩《唐書》的過程中相輔相成、綜合使用,取得很好的考證效果,對今天的史學研究具有重要的借鑒意義。他考證兩《唐書》的內容深入具體,取得了豐碩的成果,值得后人借鑒。王鳴盛非常重視對唐代典章制度的考察,尤其是在官制、地理、兵制、考試制度、禮制等方面用力尤多。王鳴盛對唐代職官制度的研究,涉及到唐代的中樞機構、官祿爵位等級、官制的變遷等方面;地理方面主要是對兩《唐書》地名錯訛、唐代的相似地名及專有地名、政區(qū)建置演變和地理形勝等方面;兵制方面主要是對唐代府兵制、募兵制以及唐中后期宦官典兵弊端等方面的考察;科舉考試方面重點是對唐代科舉取士的基本特點及其優(yōu)劣的辯說;文化方面包括對唐代的避諱文化和禮制文化等方面的考察。王鳴盛在對相關文獻史料細致考察的基礎上,對唐代的典章制度進行了深入的探究,為后世能比較清晰地了解唐代制度的特色及制度的沿革演變作出了重要貢獻。此外,王鳴盛對唐代的重要史實及歷史人物進行了評價,他的評說觀點鮮明,不隨俗流,在尊重事實的基礎上,客觀公正地評價史實和人物,確立了知人論世的原則。當然,王鳴盛考證唐史的過程中也存在一些缺漏和不足,如兩《唐書》�？鄙系氖杪�,史評上有些地方明顯過于苛刻,考證中遺留的存疑問題過多等,這些問題需要我們特別注意�？傮w來說,王鳴盛唐史研究的成就是豐碩的,考察了兩《唐書》編撰的特點,細致考辨了唐代的典章制度,在唐代重要史實及人物的評價上不落俗套,見解獨到,他的真知灼見給后世治史者很大的啟發(fā),為后人研究唐史提供了新的思路。
[Abstract]:The Qianjia period of Qing Dynasty was the prosperous period of ancient historical textual research in China. Wang Mingsheng was one of the outstanding representatives of textual research talents. He, along with Qian Daxin and Zhao Yi, were called historians of Qianjia three major examinations. Wang Ming-sheng has made great contributions to the study of Tang Dynasty history. Wang Mingsheng made a detailed study of the sources of historical materials, compilation methods, contents, calligraphy, and so on of the two "Tang Shu", and summed up the pros and cons of the compilation of the two books; he also made a detailed collation of the two "Tang Shu" texts. He corrected the errors in the texts of the two books, got them out of the way and exuded envy; his textual research on the two "Tang Books" mainly included induction, comparative law, and the method of cross-proving of the history of the monument, among which the method of cross-proving of the history of the tablet was a major feature of his examination of the history. These methods complement each other in the process of their textual research and comprehensive use to obtain good textual research results, which is of great significance for the study of historiography today. His textual research on the contents of the two books of the Tang Dynasty is profound and concrete, and he has made fruitful achievements, which are worthy of reference by later generations. Wang Ming-sheng attached great importance to the inspection of Tang Dynasty regulations, especially in the official system, geography, military system, examination system, etiquette and so on. Wang Mingsheng's research on the official system of the Tang Dynasty involves the central organization of the Tang Dynasty, the rank of the official and the rank of the rank, the change of the official system, and so on; the geographical aspect is mainly the mistake of the two "Tang Shu" names, the similar place names and the exclusive place names in the Tang Dynasty. The military system is mainly about the military system of the Tang Dynasty, the recruitment system and the malpractice of the eunuchs in the middle and late period of the Tang Dynasty. The Keystone of imperial examination is to argue about the basic characteristics and advantages and disadvantages of the imperial examination in the Tang Dynasty, and the cultural aspect includes the investigation of the culture of taboo and the culture of etiquette in the Tang Dynasty. On the basis of careful investigation of relevant historical documents, Wang Mingsheng made a deep exploration of the system of the Tang Dynasty, which made an important contribution to the understanding of the characteristics of the system of the Tang Dynasty and the evolution of the system in later generations. In addition, Wang Ming-sheng evaluated the important historical facts and historical figures of the Tang Dynasty. His comments had a clear viewpoint, did not follow the popular trend, and objectively and fairly evaluated historical facts and figures on the basis of respecting the facts, and established the principle of knowing the people and discussing the world. Of course, in the course of Wang Mingsheng's textual research into the history of the Tang Dynasty, there are also some omissions and deficiencies, such as the omissions in the collation of the two "Tang Books", the obvious harshness in some parts of the history review, and the excessive number of questions left over in the textual research, and so on. These problems require our special attention. On the whole, Wang Ming's achievements in the study of the history of the prosperous Tang Dynasty have been fruitful. The characteristics of the compilation of the two "Tang Dynasty Books" have been investigated, and the rules and regulations of the Tang Dynasty have been carefully examined and distinguished. The important historical facts of the Tang Dynasty and the evaluation of the figures are not out of line, and their opinions are unique. His insights enlighten the later scholars and provide new ideas for the later generations to study the history of the Tang Dynasty.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：K242

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉玲;;從《十七史商榷》看王鳴盛品評歷史人物的特點[J];安徽史學;2008年06期

2 王純;從《蛾術編》與《十駕齋養(yǎng)新錄》看王鳴盛與錢大昕的文獻學成就[J];圖書與情報;2002年04期

3 羅炳良;;關于乾嘉考史學者褒貶意識的思考[J];傳統(tǒng)文化與現(xiàn)代化;1999年03期

4 張連生;;《十七史商榷》的歷史考據學方法與成就[J];東北師大學報;2006年06期

5 周振鶴;點石成金、披沙瀝金與臉上貼金[J];讀書;1995年03期

6 施建雄;王鳴盛歷史地理考證的理性探求[J];福建師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年06期

7 龐祖喜;王鳴盛的文獻學思想及其實踐[J];廣西師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1994年03期

8 陳鴻森;;王鳴盛西莊遺文輯存剩稿[J];古籍整理研究學刊;2014年01期

9 高平;王鳴盛治史的務實精神[J];北京教育學院學報;1999年03期

10 林文，

本文編號：1861032