本文選題：國(guó)家 + 對(duì)手��； 參考：《中國(guó)邊疆史地研究》2007年03期

【摘要】：本文認(rèn)為,中國(guó)古代并沒(méi)有真正意義上的國(guó)家觀,各王朝所持有的是天下觀。即在法理上,中原王朝并不認(rèn)為天下有與自己平起平坐的國(guó)家。這一觀念自先秦時(shí)期奠定之后,影響深遠(yuǎn),即便是由傳統(tǒng)的"蠻夷之邦"入主中原的王朝也不自覺(jué)地接受了這一政治觀念。但是,天下觀在其長(zhǎng)期的政治實(shí)踐中,卻不得不每每面臨諸多強(qiáng)大對(duì)手的挑戰(zhàn)。因此,每當(dāng)此時(shí),雙方的實(shí)際控制線就有了一定的邊界含義。不過(guò),真正近代意義上的邊界出現(xiàn)于清朝。即當(dāng)清朝面臨沙俄這樣從未接觸過(guò)的具有全新文明的強(qiáng)大對(duì)手的挑戰(zhàn)時(shí),近代意義上的國(guó)與國(guó)之間的邊界才最終形成。換言之,只有當(dāng)中國(guó)面臨的對(duì)手足夠強(qiáng)大,或者說(shuō)其文明受阻于強(qiáng)敵時(shí),天下觀才轉(zhuǎn)為國(guó)家觀,有邊無(wú)界的狀態(tài)才得以消解。
[Abstract]:This paper argues that there was no real sense of state view in ancient China, and that all dynasties held a view of the world.That is, in the legal theory, the Central Plains Dynasty did not think that the world and their own country on an equal footing.Since the pre-Qin period, this concept has a profound influence, even the traditional "barbarian state" into the Central Plains dynasty unconsciously accepted this political concept.However, the world view in its long-term political practice, but often have to face the challenges of many strong opponents.Therefore, each time, both sides of the actual control line has a certain boundary meaning.However, the real modern sense of the boundary appeared in the Qing Dynasty.That is, when the Qing Dynasty faced the challenge of a powerful opponent with a new civilization, which had never been contacted by Russia, the boundary between countries in the modern sense was finally formed.In other words, only when China faces a strong enough adversary, or if its civilization is blocked by a strong enemy, can the view of the world be transformed into a state view, and the borderless state of being dispelled.
【作者單位】：
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K207

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇亮;;清代馬政述略[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2010年03期

2 史可非;;試論清朝在對(duì)歷代帝王廟建成統(tǒng)一多民族國(guó)家祭祀體系上的貢獻(xiàn)[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2010年04期

3 蘇亮;;清(后金)政權(quán)關(guān)外統(tǒng)治時(shí)期軍制述略[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2010年06期

4 張，

本文編號(hào)：1736462