本文選題：儒家文明　切入點(diǎn)：理性　出處：《東岳論叢》2017年10期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：新文化運(yùn)動(dòng)之于啟蒙,是一個(gè)永遠(yuǎn)找不到唯一答案的問題。那場(chǎng)運(yùn)動(dòng)的一個(gè)重要遺產(chǎn)就是將個(gè)體從家權(quán)、族權(quán)、國權(quán)的繁重束縛中解脫出來,從一開始便以"自我"出場(chǎng),掀起一場(chǎng)旨在解放主體的革命。可當(dāng)儒家綱常倫理退出社會(huì)價(jià)值體系后,所帶來的卻并非主體的自由獨(dú)立,而是失去價(jià)值導(dǎo)向的空虛的個(gè)人。事實(shí)上,這種虛無的"個(gè)人主義"現(xiàn)象的出現(xiàn)正是由于在新文化運(yùn)動(dòng)中"救亡"壓倒了"啟蒙","國家主義"權(quán)威成為主體新的"外在"統(tǒng)治力量。而解救這一"現(xiàn)代性"弊病的可能途徑在于主體"公共理性"的培育。
[Abstract]:The New Cultural Movement is a question that can never be found the only answer to enlightenment. One of the important legacies of that movement was to free individuals from the onerous shackles of family, clan, and national power, and to appear as "self" from the very beginning. Set off a revolution aimed at liberating the subject. But when the Confucian code of ethics withdrew from the social value system, it was not the freedom and independence of the subject, but the empty individual who lost the value orientation. In fact, The emergence of this nihilistic "individualism" phenomenon is precisely because in the New Cultural Movement "saving the nation" overcame the "enlightenment", and the authority of "nationalism" became the new "external" ruling force of the subject, and saved this "modernity". The possible way of malady lies in the cultivation of public rationality.
【作者單位】： 安徽大學(xué)哲學(xué)系;
【基金】：安徽省規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目“‘中國夢(mèng)’視野內(nèi)的集體主義價(jià)值觀建構(gòu)研究”(AHSKY2014D65) 安徽大學(xué)研究生創(chuàng)新扶持項(xiàng)目“新文化運(yùn)動(dòng)后主體性哲學(xué)的建構(gòu)”(yfc100095)階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：B222;K203
，

本文編號(hào)：1651418