論新帝國主義的表現(xiàn)形式及其實(shí)質(zhì)
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-05-23 14:25
【摘要】：“帝國主義”這個(gè)概念是在風(fēng)云變幻的近代資本主義歷史推演中逐步產(chǎn)生和向歷史縱深化發(fā)展的一種現(xiàn)象。國內(nèi)外學(xué)者普遍承認(rèn),“帝國主義”這個(gè)概念是在19世紀(jì)末、20世紀(jì)初的歐洲國家進(jìn)行對(duì)外殖民開發(fā)時(shí)產(chǎn)生的。當(dāng)然,在全球范圍內(nèi)特別是歐洲大陸上,有關(guān)“帝國主義”的各種觀點(diǎn)和著作也在隨著帝國主義對(duì)人類歷史發(fā)展所產(chǎn)生的廣泛影響而不斷涌現(xiàn),它們不但代表著各種政治勢(shì)力的利益和主張,而且也反映出不同社會(huì)階層的愿望和訴求。在這些著作中,列寧出版的《帝國主義是資本主義的最高階段》一書對(duì)帝國主義的分析是最為精辟的。但是,當(dāng)資本主義發(fā)展到現(xiàn)在,也有許多學(xué)者認(rèn)為列寧對(duì)帝國主義的論述已經(jīng)“過時(shí)”、“言之過早”或“言過其實(shí)”了。因此,在當(dāng)今全球化背景下,對(duì)帝國主義新的表現(xiàn)形式及其實(shí)質(zhì)進(jìn)行探討和研究,不僅可以進(jìn)一步剖析壟斷資本主義的經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系,認(rèn)清資本主義的本質(zhì)和矛盾,而且也豐富了對(duì)馬克思主義科學(xué)的帝國主義理論的理解和認(rèn)識(shí),對(duì)我國學(xué)術(shù)界有著極其重要的理論參考價(jià)值。 筆者認(rèn)為列寧講帝國主義是“腐朽的”、“垂死的”,是指資本主義發(fā)展的一種趨勢(shì)和過程。資本主義只不過是從最早的私人壟斷發(fā)展到列寧所處的國家壟斷時(shí)期,現(xiàn)在的資本主義是處于一種國際壟斷時(shí)期。由于社會(huì)主義革命和世界民族革命運(yùn)動(dòng)的進(jìn)行,使得以殖民統(tǒng)治為標(biāo)志的舊的“帝國主義”時(shí)代已經(jīng)終結(jié),但這并不代表帝國主義歷史的完結(jié)和帝國主義的徹底消亡。隨著世界殖民體系的解體,“舊”帝國主義存在和演化發(fā)展的時(shí)空要素都已消亡,然而列寧所揭示出的帝國主義“最深厚基礎(chǔ)的”壟斷資本仍然存在,而且還在不斷發(fā)展。因此,帝國主義者是絕不會(huì)就此退出歷史舞臺(tái)的,必然會(huì)尋找種種借口,制造種種輿論,披上合法和公正的外衣再度登場(chǎng)。于是,一種新型的帝國主義在其舊的老宅基上重新又發(fā)展起來了,帝國主義從舊的“殖民占領(lǐng)型”發(fā)展到了現(xiàn)在的“全球控制型”,即新帝國主義時(shí)期。 但是,“新帝國主義”的相關(guān)論述迄今為止還未能形成一個(gè)完整的理論體系,有的多是一些專家、學(xué)者和媒體人的言論匯集,但是其對(duì)人類歷史發(fā)展進(jìn)程的影響卻在不斷深化。本文運(yùn)用歷史分析法、文獻(xiàn)分析法和系統(tǒng)分析法,從新帝國主義的產(chǎn)生背景出發(fā),探索和分析了新帝國主義產(chǎn)生的根源及其內(nèi)涵,歸納和梳理了當(dāng)今世界上主要的兩種新帝國主義理論,以及在這些理論之下產(chǎn)生的各種主要觀點(diǎn)；接著,又在此基礎(chǔ)上系統(tǒng)的總結(jié)和分析了新帝國主義在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、軍事和文化領(lǐng)域的表現(xiàn)形式；最后,筆者運(yùn)用了大衛(wèi)·哈維有關(guān)領(lǐng)土邏輯和資本邏輯的辯證分析法,從資本主義的最原始的動(dòng)力——資本擴(kuò)張出發(fā),揭示出新帝國主義的實(shí)質(zhì)是對(duì)廣大發(fā)展中的民族國家的剝奪性積累,最終目標(biāo)是對(duì)整個(gè)世界進(jìn)行重構(gòu)和整治。最終論證出,新帝國主義與舊帝國主義在本質(zhì)上是一致的,還是一種剝奪性積累的帝國主義,是對(duì)“舊帝國主義”的揚(yáng)棄。
[Abstract]:The concept of imperialism is a kind of phenomenon in the development of the historical deduction of the modern capitalism in the change of the wind. The scholars at home and abroad generally recognize that the concept of imperialism is produced in the end of the 19th century and the European countries in the beginning of the 20th century. Of course, the various views and works of the imperialism, especially on the continental Europe, are emerging from the wide influence of the imperialism on the development of human history. They not only represent the interests and opinions of various political forces, but also reflect the wishes and demands of different social strata. In these works, Lenin's publication of the "highest stage of capitalism" is the most incisive of the analysis of the imperialism. However, when the capitalism has developed to the present, many scholars believe that Lenin's discourse on imperialism is outdated, too early, or in fact. Therefore, in the context of the present globalization, the new forms of imperialism and its essence are discussed and studied, not only can the monopoly be further analyzed The author thinks that Lenin's theory of imperialism is the "decadent" and the "dying", which is a trend and process of the development of capitalism. The capitalism is only from the earliest private monopoly to the state monopoly period in which Lenin is located. The present capitalism is in an international monopoly period. Because of the socialist revolution and the movement of the world's national revolution, the old "imperialism" time has ended, but it does not represent the end of the history of imperialism and the complete extinction of the imperialism. With the disintegration of the world's colonial system, the historical and temporal elements of the development of the "old" imperialism have disappeared. However, the monopoly capital of the imperialist "deep-based", which is revealed by Lenin, is still and is still developing. Therefore, the imperialists are never going to exit the stage of history. Therefore, a new type of imperialism will never exit the historical stage. Therefore, a new type of imperialism is developed again on the old and old house base, and the imperialism is developed from the old "colonial occupation" to the present "global control type", that is, when the new imperialism However, the related discussion of the "new imperialism" has not yet formed a complete theoretical system. Some experts, scholars and the media people's comments come together, but their impact on the process of human history development is deepening. This paper, based on the background of the new imperialism, explores and analyzes the root causes and its contents of the new imperialism from the background of the new imperialism, and sums up and analyses the main viewpoints of the new imperialism in the political, economic, military and cultural fields. Finally, the author uses the dialectical analysis of the logic of the territory and the logic of the capital in the world, and reveals the essence of the new imperialism from the most primitive power _ capital expansion of capitalism. The ultimate goal is to reconstruct and control the whole world. Finally, it is proved that the new imperialism and the old imperialism are in essence the same.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D033.3
本文編號(hào)：2483974
[Abstract]:The concept of imperialism is a kind of phenomenon in the development of the historical deduction of the modern capitalism in the change of the wind. The scholars at home and abroad generally recognize that the concept of imperialism is produced in the end of the 19th century and the European countries in the beginning of the 20th century. Of course, the various views and works of the imperialism, especially on the continental Europe, are emerging from the wide influence of the imperialism on the development of human history. They not only represent the interests and opinions of various political forces, but also reflect the wishes and demands of different social strata. In these works, Lenin's publication of the "highest stage of capitalism" is the most incisive of the analysis of the imperialism. However, when the capitalism has developed to the present, many scholars believe that Lenin's discourse on imperialism is outdated, too early, or in fact. Therefore, in the context of the present globalization, the new forms of imperialism and its essence are discussed and studied, not only can the monopoly be further analyzed The author thinks that Lenin's theory of imperialism is the "decadent" and the "dying", which is a trend and process of the development of capitalism. The capitalism is only from the earliest private monopoly to the state monopoly period in which Lenin is located. The present capitalism is in an international monopoly period. Because of the socialist revolution and the movement of the world's national revolution, the old "imperialism" time has ended, but it does not represent the end of the history of imperialism and the complete extinction of the imperialism. With the disintegration of the world's colonial system, the historical and temporal elements of the development of the "old" imperialism have disappeared. However, the monopoly capital of the imperialist "deep-based", which is revealed by Lenin, is still and is still developing. Therefore, the imperialists are never going to exit the stage of history. Therefore, a new type of imperialism will never exit the historical stage. Therefore, a new type of imperialism is developed again on the old and old house base, and the imperialism is developed from the old "colonial occupation" to the present "global control type", that is, when the new imperialism However, the related discussion of the "new imperialism" has not yet formed a complete theoretical system. Some experts, scholars and the media people's comments come together, but their impact on the process of human history development is deepening. This paper, based on the background of the new imperialism, explores and analyzes the root causes and its contents of the new imperialism from the background of the new imperialism, and sums up and analyses the main viewpoints of the new imperialism in the political, economic, military and cultural fields. Finally, the author uses the dialectical analysis of the logic of the territory and the logic of the capital in the world, and reveals the essence of the new imperialism from the most primitive power _ capital expansion of capitalism. The ultimate goal is to reconstruct and control the whole world. Finally, it is proved that the new imperialism and the old imperialism are in essence the same.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D033.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 魯傳穎;;后金融危機(jī)時(shí)期中國參與國際金融體系改革的目標(biāo)和路徑——以中國參與IMF改革為例[J];東南亞縱橫;2011年08期
2 盧祖送,葛傳紅;新帝國治理模式的現(xiàn)實(shí)與困境[J];國際觀察;2005年05期
3 約翰·貝·福斯特,王宏偉;帝國主義的新時(shí)代[J];國外理論動(dòng)態(tài);2003年12期
4 羅文東;劉曉輝;;美國學(xué)者大衛(wèi)·科茲談“新帝國主義”[J];高校理論戰(zhàn)線;2007年03期
5 白云;張峰;;新自由主義霸權(quán)與金融危機(jī)——大衛(wèi)·哈維《新帝國主義》評(píng)析[J];高校理論戰(zhàn)線;2011年04期
6 張幼文;;包容性發(fā)展:世界共享繁榮之道[J];上海國資;2011年06期
7 田文峰;;當(dāng)代金融帝國主義的表象與本質(zhì)——基于列寧“帝國主義論”之闡釋[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年01期
8 邢文增;;西方左翼學(xué)者論帝國主義的新特征[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期
9 李瀟瀟;;論“新帝國主義”的實(shí)質(zhì)、根源及影響[J];江漢論壇;2006年10期
10 張佳;;大衛(wèi)·哈維的空間批判理論論析[J];江漢論壇;2012年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 溫麗娟;國外帝國主義論研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年
2 聶繼永;全球化與中國崛起[D];中共中央黨校;2005年
3 劉阿明;布什主義——關(guān)于美國新帝國戰(zhàn)略的一種研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2005年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 劉海霞;文化帝國主義理論與民族文化的未來之路[D];四川外語學(xué)院;2011年
2 張偉濤;“新帝國主義”評(píng)析[D];山東師范大學(xué);2006年
3 趙修洪;全球化語境中文化帝國主義的影響及應(yīng)對(duì)策略[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2008年
4 周耀;中國化馬克思主義外交思想研究[D];西南大學(xué);2009年
5 段向帥;論“新帝國主義”及其主要特征[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年
6 沈曉非;美國民主輸出戰(zhàn)略與中國特色社會(huì)主義民主政治建設(shè)[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2010年
，本文編號(hào)：2483974
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2483974.html
最近更新
教材專著
