【摘要】：在思想史上,對原壤形象出現(xiàn)了兩種不同的建構(gòu)。原壤先被視為一個"失禮"之人,后被皇侃改塑成一個具有獨(dú)立思想的"方外圣人"。前者關(guān)注原壤與孔子的"故舊"關(guān)系,從而將全章主旨放在"老而不死是為賊"之上,由此深入思考禮法秩序的存在根基問題;后者則側(cè)重思考原壤的個人思想,為原壤的失禮進(jìn)行辯護(hù),進(jìn)而為消解禮法秩序提供思想資源。朱子對原壤形象進(jìn)行了創(chuàng)造性的重構(gòu),在尊重原壤思想形象的同時對之進(jìn)行了根本否定,使該章主旨得以重現(xiàn)�，F(xiàn)代思想基于平等自由的訴求,消解了朱子的努力,遮蔽了該章本來嚴(yán)肅重大的問題,降低了該章及經(jīng)典的重大價值。只有超越現(xiàn)代思想的視野,才能夠真正重建經(jīng)典的價值。
[Abstract]:In the history of thought, there are two different constructions of the original earth image. Yuanyu was first regarded as a "disrespectful" person, then transformed into a sage with independent thought. The former pays close attention to the relationship between the original soil and Confucius, and puts the whole chapter on the basis of "the old but not dying is a thief", thus deeply thinking about the existence foundation of the order of etiquette and law; The latter focuses on his personal thoughts, defends his impoliteness, and provides ideological resources for dispelling the order of ritual law. Zhu Zi reconstructed the original soil image creatively and denied it at the same time while respecting the original soil image so that the main purpose of this chapter can be reproduced. Based on the demand of equality and freedom, modern thought dispels Zhu Zi's efforts, obscures the serious and important problems in this chapter, and reduces the great value of the chapter and its classics. Only by transcending the vision of modern thought can the classical value be truly rebuilt.
【作者單位】： 貴州師范大學(xué)政治學(xué)系;貴州陽明文化研究院;
【分類號】：D092
，

本文編號：2393493