【摘要】：如同恩格斯的論述,中國早期國家的壓迫者階級即社會(huì)的"主人"的產(chǎn)生,是由原始共同體內(nèi)的社會(huì)"公仆"因其權(quán)力的異化發(fā)展而來的。這樣一條階級與國家產(chǎn)生的道路與古希臘羅馬奴隸制國家是全然不同的。夏作為中國古代第一王朝,其"家天下"亦是禹治洪水的過程中因集中控制各部族的人力物力,導(dǎo)致禹個(gè)人身份的這種變化而建立起來的。夏商周三代社會(huì)形態(tài)不是奴隸社會(huì),亦非封建社會(huì),或者可以用過去雷海宗提出的"部民社會(huì)"來加以概括。
[Abstract]:As Engels argued, the oppressor class of China's early state, the "master" of the society, developed from the alienation of its power by the social "public servants" in the primitive community. Such a class and a state came into being in a completely different way from the ancient Greek and Roman slavery states. Xia, as the first dynasty in ancient China, its "family world" was also established in the process of Yuzhi flood because of the centralized control of the human and material resources of the tribes, which led to the change of Yu's personal identity. The social form of Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties is not slave society or feudal society, or can be summed up by Lei Haizong's "civil society" in the past.
【作者單位】： 河北師范大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D033
，

本文編號：2348430