【摘要】：阿克曼主張權(quán)力正當(dāng)性的基礎(chǔ)在于政治對(duì)話的完滿性,這一學(xué)說(shuō)成為繼羅爾斯之后又一新的理論焦點(diǎn)。政治對(duì)話中的限定性原則與公民資格是構(gòu)建權(quán)力正當(dāng)性理想圖景的兩個(gè)必備要素。限定性原則是讓持有諸多互競(jìng)且不可通約善觀念的自由而平等的公民在各種觀念之間保持中立,是權(quán)力正當(dāng)性的前提要件;而公民資格則是評(píng)判權(quán)力正當(dāng)性的決定性要素,它要求政治對(duì)話者在那些涉及他們所倡導(dǎo)的原則及政策如何能夠被公共理性的政治價(jià)值所支持的根本性問(wèn)題上,能夠向彼此提供合理性的解釋。這兩要素內(nèi)在地統(tǒng)一于政治對(duì)話理論中,成為達(dá)致權(quán)力正當(dāng)性的二維架構(gòu)。
[Abstract]:Ackerman claims that the legitimacy of power is based on the completeness of political dialogue, which has become a new theoretical focus after Rawls. The principle of limitation and citizenship in political dialogue are two essential elements to construct the ideal picture of legitimacy of power. The principle of limitation is to keep the free and equal citizens who hold a lot of competing and irreconcilable good ideas to be neutral among the various ideas, which is the precondition of the legitimacy of power. Citizenship, on the other hand, is a decisive factor in judging the legitimacy of power, requiring political interlocutors to address fundamental questions about how the principles and policies they advocate can be supported by the political values of public reason. Be able to provide each other with an explanation of reasonableness. These two elements are intrinsically unified in the theory of political dialogue and become a two-dimensional framework to achieve the legitimacy of power.
【作者單位】： 江蘇大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目(16AJL005) 江蘇省社科基金一般項(xiàng)目(16FXB006) 江蘇省高校哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)一般項(xiàng)目(2016SJB820021) 江蘇大學(xué)高級(jí)人才專項(xiàng)資助項(xiàng)目(11JDG186)
【分類號(hào)】：D0
，

本文編號(hào)：2346732