【摘要】：在近代中國自由主義的發(fā)展史上,作為第二代和第三代的代表人物,胡適和殷海光都留下了濃墨重彩的一筆。胡適從五四時期起便“暴得大名”,此后一直被公認(rèn)為是二十世紀(jì)上半葉中國自由主義的領(lǐng)袖和旗幟；殷海光則是二十世紀(jì)五十和六十年代臺灣地區(qū)著名的政論家和自由主義思想家,被學(xué)界認(rèn)為是和胡適齊名的自由主義大師。殷海光的學(xué)生,著名學(xué)者李敖曾把胡適和殷海光比作是陷在臺島上的兩條蛟龍,并對兩位大師無比欽佩。雖然兩人都屬于中國近代自由主義的譜系,但無論是在知識論基礎(chǔ)上,還是自由主義思想的具體內(nèi)容上,胡適和殷海光都有著非常大的區(qū)別,而且這并非偶然,在這區(qū)別的背后充分體現(xiàn)了近代中國自由主義發(fā)展的脈絡(luò)和趨勢,特別是西方的自由主義如何與中國的傳統(tǒng)文化相結(jié)合、自由民主如何在本土得以落實等重要問題,在我們對胡適和殷海光的思想進(jìn)行比較研究之后,或許就可以得到答案。 在結(jié)構(gòu)上,本文擬分四章構(gòu)成。第一部分是緒論,介紹論文的選題背景和研究現(xiàn)狀。第一章從知識論基礎(chǔ)的角度對胡適和殷海光的自由主義思想進(jìn)行比較,挖掘出兩人在指導(dǎo)思想上的根本差異。第二章分為四節(jié),從自由的內(nèi)涵、對個人主義的理解、經(jīng)濟(jì)自由以及自由主義和傳統(tǒng)文化之間的關(guān)系四個方面對胡適和殷海光自由主義思想的具體內(nèi)容進(jìn)行比較分析。最后為結(jié)語,通過對兩人自由主義思想的分析和比較,揭示出殷海光后期思想的全面轉(zhuǎn)軌對于中國自由主義發(fā)展轉(zhuǎn)進(jìn)的重要意義。
[Abstract]:In the history of modern Chinese liberalism, Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang, as the representatives of the second and third generation, both left a heavy stroke. Hu Shi has been known as a violent man since the May 4th Movement, and has been recognized as the leader and banner of Chinese liberalism in the first half of the 20th century. Yin Haiguang is a famous political theorist and liberalism thinker in Taiwan in 1950s and 1960s. Yin Haiguang's students and famous scholar Li ao once compared Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang to two dragons trapped on the island of Taiwan and admired the two masters. Although both of them belong to the genealogy of Chinese modern liberalism, Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang are very different, not only by accident, but also on the basis of knowledge theory and on the concrete content of liberalism thought. Behind this distinction, it fully reflects the context and trend of the development of liberalism in modern China, especially the important issues such as how western liberalism combines with Chinese traditional culture and how freedom and democracy can be implemented locally. After our comparative study of Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang's thoughts, we may be able to get the answer. In structure, this paper is divided into four chapters. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the background and research status of the thesis. The first chapter compares Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang's liberalism thought from the angle of knowledge theory foundation, and excavates the fundamental difference between them in guiding ideology. The second chapter is divided into four sections, from the connotation of freedom, the understanding of individualism, economic freedom and the relationship between liberalism and traditional culture, the specific contents of Hu Shi and Yin Haiguang liberalism thought are compared and analyzed. Finally, the conclusion, through the analysis and comparison of the two liberalism thoughts, reveals the significance of the overall transformation of Yin Haiguang's late thought to the development of Chinese liberalism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D092

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 劉黎紅;;“五四”時期兩種整理國故活動的比較[J];東方論壇(青島大學(xué)學(xué)報);2006年03期

2 俞祖華;趙慧峰;;從胡適到殷海光:近代自由主義的趨新與返古[J];河北學(xué)刊;2011年05期

3 陳先初;楊錚錚;;試論殷海光的中國文化觀[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2007年05期

4 趙慧峰;俞祖華;;從嚴(yán)復(fù)到胡適:近代自由主義思潮的傳承與調(diào)適[J];文史哲;2010年06期

5 任劍濤;以邏輯支撐信念——論殷海光自由主義的理論特質(zhì)[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年04期

，

本文編號：2345259