價值觀視域中的天人之辯
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-23 13:56
【摘要】：從價值觀的視域看,天人之辯既涉及人自身的存在,也關乎人與對象之間的關系。在人的存在這一層面,儒家注重化天性為德性,道家則以維護和回歸天性為指向,二者各有所見,也蘊含自身的問題,合理的取向體現(xiàn)在超越天性和德性之間的對峙和分離;它的深層意義,則在于一方面確認人之為人的本質,另一方面又避免社會規(guī)范的形式化、外在化。在人與對象之間的關系上,今天面臨三重超越或三重揚棄:首先是揚棄前現(xiàn)代的視域,其實質內(nèi)涵在于超越天人之間原始的合一;其次是揚棄片面的現(xiàn)代性視域,其實質內(nèi)涵在于超越天人之間的抽象分離;其三,超越后現(xiàn)代的視域,其實質表現(xiàn)為在天人互動充分發(fā)展的前提下,在更高的歷史階段重建天人之間的統(tǒng)一。以上超越,同時表現(xiàn)為以歷史主義的觀念,理解和看待天人之間的關系,其價值的指向,則是人道原則與自然原則的統(tǒng)一。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of values, the debate of Heaven and Man involves not only the existence of man itself, but also the relationship between man and object. At the level of human existence, Confucianism pays attention to transforming nature into virtue, while Taoism takes safeguarding and returning to nature as its direction. Both have their own problems and their reasonable orientation is reflected in the confrontation and separation between transcendent nature and virtue. The deep meaning of it lies in, on the one hand, recognizing the essence of human being, on the other hand, avoiding the formalization and externalization of social norms. In the relationship between human beings and objects, today we are faced with triple transcendence or triple sublation: first, abandoning the pre-modern horizon, the essence of which lies in transcending the original unity between heaven and man; secondly, sublation and one-sided modernity. The essence of it is to transcend the abstract separation between man and nature; thirdly, to transcend the field of postmodernism, the essence of which is to reconstruct the unity of heaven and man at a higher historical stage under the premise of the full development of the interaction between heaven and man. At the same time, the above transcendence is manifested in the conception of historicism and the understanding and view of the relationship between nature and man, the value of which is the unity of the principle of humanity and the principle of nature.
【作者單位】： 華東師范大學中國現(xiàn)代思想文化研究所暨哲學系;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項目“中國文化的認知基礎與結構研究”(10&ZD064) 教育部人文社科重點研究基地重大項目“實踐智慧:歷史與理論”(11JJD720004) 上海市社科創(chuàng)新基地華東師范大學“文化觀念與核心價值”項目
【分類號】：D092
，
本文編號：2289455
[Abstract]:From the perspective of values, the debate of Heaven and Man involves not only the existence of man itself, but also the relationship between man and object. At the level of human existence, Confucianism pays attention to transforming nature into virtue, while Taoism takes safeguarding and returning to nature as its direction. Both have their own problems and their reasonable orientation is reflected in the confrontation and separation between transcendent nature and virtue. The deep meaning of it lies in, on the one hand, recognizing the essence of human being, on the other hand, avoiding the formalization and externalization of social norms. In the relationship between human beings and objects, today we are faced with triple transcendence or triple sublation: first, abandoning the pre-modern horizon, the essence of which lies in transcending the original unity between heaven and man; secondly, sublation and one-sided modernity. The essence of it is to transcend the abstract separation between man and nature; thirdly, to transcend the field of postmodernism, the essence of which is to reconstruct the unity of heaven and man at a higher historical stage under the premise of the full development of the interaction between heaven and man. At the same time, the above transcendence is manifested in the conception of historicism and the understanding and view of the relationship between nature and man, the value of which is the unity of the principle of humanity and the principle of nature.
【作者單位】： 華東師范大學中國現(xiàn)代思想文化研究所暨哲學系;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項目“中國文化的認知基礎與結構研究”(10&ZD064) 教育部人文社科重點研究基地重大項目“實踐智慧:歷史與理論”(11JJD720004) 上海市社科創(chuàng)新基地華東師范大學“文化觀念與核心價值”項目
【分類號】：D092
，
本文編號：2289455
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2289455.html
