20世紀(jì)20年代初“社會主義論爭”探析
[Abstract]:The controversy between Marxism and Kilt Socialism, which occurred in the early 1920s, is a historical event in the early spreading process of Marxism in China, and plays an important role in the process of Sinicization of early Marxism and its philosophy. Through the analysis of the argument of Socialism, we can further deepen the theoretical research on the Sinicization of early Marxism and its philosophy. First of all, this paper introduces the background and the specific process of the controversy in detail. Then, according to the rich and detailed data system, the thesis expounds the main issues and viewpoints of both sides. The contents of the controversy are summarized as five major topics: whether China can immediately implement socialism, how to treat domestic social contradictions, how to develop industry and enhance wealth, how to treat the consequences of developing industry with capitalism and the stage of social development. Then the main viewpoints of the representatives of both sides are discussed respectively. Finally, based on the previous contents and the historical facts of the past 90 years, the author analyzes the nature of the controversy, the nature of Kilt socialism, the representative viewpoints in the debate and the historical influence of the controversy. This paper holds that the exploration of the way of social development by the advanced intellectuals caused by the darkness of domestic politics is the internal factor of the controversy. The essence of the controversy is the question of revolution and improvement, and the Kilt Socialists are a group of reformists. There are a lot of reasonable elements in the views of Kilt Socialists, while the views of early Marxists have some shortcomings and defects. The controversy promoted the spread of scientific socialism and historical materialism in China and laid a solid foundation for the establishment of the Communist Party of China and the development of the Chinese revolution. The implications of the controversy on the cause of socialist construction in China are as follows: first, people should correct the deviation in understanding "socialism"; second, people should overcome the mentality of "socialist construction" eager for quick success and instant benefit; third, People should use Marxist philosophy to guide the practice of scientific socialism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:燕山大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D091.6
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 邸乘光;五四時期馬克思主義在中國廣泛傳播的歷史條件[J];安徽史學(xué);1999年03期
2 王先俊;;論“五四”后的社會改造思潮[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期
3 張勝利;;羅素思想對中國“五四”時期的影響[J];中共長春市委黨校學(xué)報;2006年02期
4 鄧進(jìn);;早期中國共產(chǎn)黨人與三大思潮的交鋒[J];湖北省社會主義學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年06期
5 楊陽;;試析基爾特社會主義在中國的傳播[J];廣西社會科學(xué);2009年06期
6 徐松林;馬克思主義在中國廣泛傳播的原因新探[J];景德鎮(zhèn)高專學(xué)報;2002年01期
7 王明生;;羅素的兩大命題與20世紀(jì)初社會主義論戰(zhàn)的再審視[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2010年02期
8 王紅霞;;自由知識分子的社會主義訴求——略論20世紀(jì)20年代前后張東蓀的心路歷程[J];濟(jì)寧學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年04期
9 王濤;二十世紀(jì)初期中國選擇馬克思主義的社會動力[J];江西社會科學(xué);2002年06期
10 宋連勝;侯建明;丁剛;;“社會主義論戰(zhàn)”與早期馬克思主義中國化[J];理論學(xué)刊;2008年06期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 孔朝霞;馬克思主義中國化的早期探索研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年
2 張立影;中國共產(chǎn)黨對資本主義認(rèn)識的歷史進(jìn)程[D];中共中央黨校;2010年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 田小波;五四時期研究系社會改造思想述論[D];湖南大學(xué);2009年
本文編號:2287562
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2287562.html