【摘要】：本研究是在反思公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化改革的大背景下,在對(duì)公共服務(wù)的價(jià)值內(nèi)涵與市場(chǎng)化的價(jià)值取向的內(nèi)在沖突的分析基礎(chǔ)上,探討了我國(guó)公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化過(guò)程中的價(jià)值背離現(xiàn)象,提出了公共服務(wù)價(jià)值回歸的建議,以期我國(guó)的公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化改革能夠在公共服務(wù)的價(jià)值約束下有序推進(jìn),維護(hù)公共服務(wù)的基本功能以及價(jià)值,促進(jìn)公共利益的實(shí)現(xiàn)。 從公共服務(wù)和市場(chǎng)化的價(jià)值沖突來(lái)看,公共服務(wù)應(yīng)當(dāng)具有公平、責(zé)任、民主的一系列價(jià)值內(nèi)涵。而市場(chǎng)表現(xiàn)出來(lái)的是在經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)中的經(jīng)濟(jì)、效率以及效果等價(jià)值取向。公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化糅合了兩者的價(jià)值于一體,其潛在的沖突表現(xiàn)為：效率與公平的沖突；顧客身份與公民身份的沖突；企業(yè)自主與公民民主的沖突；責(zé)任與行為的沖突。 公共服務(wù)與市場(chǎng)化的內(nèi)在沖突易造成公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化改革實(shí)踐中因效率追求而出現(xiàn)對(duì)公共服務(wù)價(jià)值的背離。在我國(guó)主要表現(xiàn)在以下幾個(gè)方面：公共服務(wù)對(duì)象的特殊化以及窮人的邊緣化對(duì)公平價(jià)值的背離；公共服務(wù)的責(zé)任主體錯(cuò)位以及政府監(jiān)管的不力對(duì)責(zé)任價(jià)值的背離；公共權(quán)力市場(chǎng)化以及壟斷公司的崛起對(duì)公共服務(wù)民主價(jià)值的背離。 探討公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化過(guò)程中的價(jià)值背離并不意味著對(duì)公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化改革的否定。我們依然可以通過(guò)完善相關(guān)制度安排使公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化中即追求效率的同時(shí)堅(jiān)持公共服務(wù)的內(nèi)在價(jià)值。為實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化過(guò)程中的公共服務(wù)價(jià)值回歸,首先,政府在公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化的過(guò)程中應(yīng)堅(jiān)持主體地位,加大公共財(cái)政在公共服務(wù)領(lǐng)域的支出并引導(dǎo)公共資源的在不同地區(qū)以及群體之間的合理分配；其次,要從監(jiān)管法律體系、監(jiān)管組織體系以及監(jiān)管的行政環(huán)境角度完善公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化的政府監(jiān)管；最后,通過(guò)完善公共服務(wù)價(jià)格聽(tīng)證制度、公共服務(wù)的社會(huì)問(wèn)責(zé)機(jī)制等創(chuàng)新公民參與的制度安排。
[Abstract]:Under the background of the reform of public service marketization and the analysis of the conflict between the value connotation of public service and the value orientation of marketization, this study probes into the phenomenon of value deviation in the process of marketization of public service in China. This paper puts forward some suggestions for the return of the value of public service, hoping that the market-oriented reform of public service in our country can advance orderly under the constraint of value of public service, safeguard the basic function and value of public service, and promote the realization of public interest. From the view of value conflict between public service and marketization, public service should have a series of value connotations of fairness, responsibility and democracy. What the market shows is the value orientation of economy, efficiency and effect in economic activities. The marketization of public service combines the value of both, and its potential conflicts are as follows: the conflict between efficiency and fairness; the conflict between customer identity and citizenship; the conflict between enterprise autonomy and civil democracy; and the conflict between responsibility and behavior. The inherent conflict between public service and marketization easily leads to deviation from the value of public service in the practice of public service marketization reform because of the pursuit of efficiency. In our country, it is mainly manifested in the following aspects: the specialization of the public service object and the deviation from the fair value caused by the marginalization of the poor, the dislocation of the responsible subject of the public service and the deviation from the responsibility value caused by the weak supervision of the government; The marketization of public power and the rise of monopoly company deviate from the democratic value of public service. Discussing the value deviation in the process of public service marketization does not mean negating the reform of public service marketization. We can still make the marketization of public service pursue efficiency and insist on the intrinsic value of public service by perfecting relevant institutional arrangement. In order to realize the return of the value of public service in the process of marketization of public service in our country, firstly, the government should insist on the principal position in the process of the marketization of public service. Increase public finance spending on public services and guide the rational distribution of public resources among different regions and groups; second, from the regulatory legal system, Finally, through perfecting the public service price hearing system, public service social accountability mechanism and other innovative institutional arrangements of citizen participation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D035

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 郭玉坤;;創(chuàng)新住房保障模式 解決“夾心層”住房問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn);2011年12期

2 丁煌;西方企業(yè)家政府理論評(píng)述[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);1999年06期

3 王家合;李建華;;論公共服務(wù)倫理本性的主要內(nèi)容[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

4 宋世明;工業(yè)化國(guó)家公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化對(duì)中國(guó)行政改革的啟示[J];政治學(xué)研究;2000年02期

5 謝煜;李建華;;準(zhǔn)公共物品民營(yíng)化的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析[J];行政論壇;2006年06期

6 史寒冰;;公共管理與服務(wù):走出“泛市場(chǎng)化”[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)保障;2006年04期

7 句華;;美國(guó)地方政府公共服務(wù)合同外包的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)及其啟示[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2008年07期

8 李學(xué);;不完全契約、交易費(fèi)用與治理績(jī)效——兼論公共服務(wù)市場(chǎng)化供給模式[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2009年01期

9 王家合;;當(dāng)代中國(guó)公共服務(wù)倫理:價(jià)值、失范與重構(gòu)[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2011年09期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 周志忍;[N];健康報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王謙;城鄉(xiāng)公共服務(wù)均等化問(wèn)題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2216074