東道國(guó)政治風(fēng)險(xiǎn)對(duì)中國(guó)資源型企業(yè)跨國(guó)并購(gòu)影響
[Abstract]:With the continuous progress of globalization, more and more international capital flows and cross-border cooperation between enterprises and cross-border mergers and acquisitions have also increased rapidly. Since 1990s, with the increase of enterprises' own scale and international cooperation, more and more transnational enterprises are also under the environment that the cost of financing is low and the growth rate of enterprises is slowing down. Global mergers and acquisitions are expected to grow rapidly. According to the world investment report published over the years of the United Nations Conference on Trade and development, global cross-border M & A is $97 billion 310 million in 1987 and 1 trillion and 100 billion dollars in 2012, up about 10.3 times. China's cross-border M & A also has a rapid growth trend, and the number of cross-border M & A transactions in China in the last ten years 3066, the cumulative amount of mergers and acquisitions reached $666 billion 500 million. Of which, the 2014 was the highest, almost the best year of development in 08 years. The global data on M & A activities also showed that the amount involved was nearly half as high as 13 years. With the continuous improvement of new policies and laws and regulations, the future whole In the context of the continuous rapid development of China's economy and the rapid development of industrialization and urbanization, China's demand for all kinds of energy resources will continue to increase. According to BP (2030 world energy outlook >, China and India are the two most populous countries in the world, at the moment. " In 2030, the demand for resources will be more urgent than other countries. In 2012, China's one-time energy consumption in 2012 is 2 billion 735 million, and in 2014 it will reach 38.9 billion tons, up to 42.23%, while China's GDP growth rate is 19.170% in the same period. China's economic development will be limited in the future. The storage of energy resources is relatively short, but the energy production capacity is relatively surplus, and the energy resources in Latin America are relatively rich, but the lack of investment and lack of technology and relatively inadequate production capacity. The differences in the complementary nature of the industrial development and the difference of energy resources have promoted the cross-border cooperation between China and foreign enterprises. Since 2003, China's foreign capital is mostly concentrated in the areas related to resources, which has a great relationship with China's economic policy in recent years. Under the influence of multiple favorable factors, our country's investment activities around the world are becoming more and more frequent. Until the end of 2013, nearly 1/5 of China's overseas capital flows into the field of resource investment. However, there are various crises behind it. There are many variables in the field of resource investment, the price of resources is often closely related to the politics of countries, and many subtle and uncertain factors will greatly affect the final resources. Trading prices. It is the impact of a number of environments that require Chinese investors to face more challenges. In the last 10 years, there have been many failures in overseas mergers and acquisitions in the resource-based industries, such as the failure to complete the acquisition of Unocal by CNOOC in 2005 and the acquisition of Rio by 19 billion 500 million US dollars in 2009. In 2011, China Shenhua bid for the Mongolia coal field, and CNOOC and CNOOC and other companies have suffered heavy losses. Therefore, in this context, it is essential to study the relationship between the success rate of Chinese resource enterprises and the host country's political environment. This article consists of five parts. The article is composed of five parts. The introduction is a general introduction and a brief summary of the article. It is convenient to understand the context and center of the full text. The second part is the theoretical introduction involved in this article to help understand the content behind it. The theoretical part combed the developed and developing China. In the third part, the author first introduces the concept of the political risk of overseas merger and acquisition in resource based enterprises, and then describes the characteristics of the present transnational mergers and acquisitions in China's resource-based enterprises, and finally introduces the transnational merger and acquisition. The fourth part is the empirical part of this article. In this paper, we choose the more abundant countries and representative cases in the empirical study, and select two control variables of the degree of openness and the abundance of natural resources, which are more consistent with the characteristics of the overseas merger and acquisition of the resource-based enterprises, and make the empirical research more On the basis of control variables, this paper analyzes a series of indicators related to political risks to identify the impact of these indicators on the success rate of overseas mergers and acquisitions in China's resource-based enterprises. Through empirical and in-depth research, it can be found that the political environment of the host country is stable or not for overseas investment activities. It is obvious that the more unstable political environment is more convenient for the enterprise to succeed overseas. At the same time, the host country's ability to accept foreign culture has a direct impact on the development speed of the business in the overseas business. Even if the country is more alien to the foreign culture, the acquisition activity will be affected. The study of the factors of overseas mergers and acquisitions, in-depth analysis of the problems and risks faced by overseas mergers and acquisitions, and provide constructive suggestions for the overseas investment activities of Chinese enterprises. The fifth part is the policy proposal, hoping to provide some valuable suggestions for the political risk analysis and strategy formulation in the transnational merger and acquisition of Chinese resource enterprises. To provide theoretical and empirical support for more Chinese resource-based enterprises to go out.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號(hào)】:F271;F279.2;D0
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 楊和平;資源型企業(yè)對(duì)當(dāng)?shù)亟?jīng)濟(jì)和環(huán)保的帶動(dòng)效應(yīng)芻議[J];勝利油田黨校學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期
2 楊子平;;資源型企業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型的三個(gè)視角[J];甘肅理論學(xué)刊;2006年06期
3 厲無(wú)畏;;推進(jìn)資源型城市與資源型企業(yè)的轉(zhuǎn)型發(fā)展[J];毛澤東鄧小平理論研究;2012年03期
4 宋志堅(jiān);;700多個(gè)村莊價(jià)值幾何[J];唯實(shí);2012年03期
5 尹國(guó)偉;段鵬;;資源型企業(yè)文化的影響因素分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年11期
6 孫凌宇;付子葉;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與資源型企業(yè)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];攀登;2014年03期
7 王建軍;曲波;;青海省資源型企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力分析[J];攀登;2007年06期
8 何仁春;;打造具有國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的資源型企業(yè)[J];求是;2008年13期
9 周貴川;揭筱紋;;資源型企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新管理的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境與出路[J];理論與改革;2012年02期
10 黃建康;蔣伏心;;資源型企業(yè)集群網(wǎng)絡(luò)剛性及其超越——基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)組織的視角[J];理論探索;2012年03期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前5條
1 胡新欣;付永水;黃津孚;;成果評(píng)介3:資源型企業(yè)發(fā)展接續(xù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的決策與管理[A];以科學(xué)發(fā)展觀引領(lǐng)管理創(chuàng)新——2005年全國(guó)企業(yè)管理創(chuàng)新大會(huì)資料匯編[C];2005年
2 王n,
本文編號(hào):2122034
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2122034.html