本文選題：政治聯(lián)系 + 工具行為��； 參考：《南開管理評(píng)論》2017年04期

【摘要】：企業(yè)家對(duì)于政治聯(lián)系的使用是否純粹出于利己?對(duì)該問題的探討有助于與當(dāng)前理論中"轉(zhuǎn)型深入期政治聯(lián)系是否依然具有戰(zhàn)略價(jià)值"的爭(zhēng)論對(duì)話。本文研究中國(guó)轉(zhuǎn)型經(jīng)濟(jì)背景下企業(yè)家對(duì)于政治聯(lián)系的使用,提出了工具性和親社會(huì)性兩種機(jī)制的雙重角色模型,利用江蘇、安徽等363家企業(yè)的問卷調(diào)研數(shù)據(jù),采用第一階段有調(diào)節(jié)的中介效應(yīng)模型進(jìn)行實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)。研究結(jié)果表明,中國(guó)企業(yè)家政治聯(lián)系的使用并非純粹是利己,還有利他效應(yīng)。研究企業(yè)家政治聯(lián)系背景下的"陰暗面"與"明亮面"這兩種機(jī)制都很重要。完善的制度環(huán)境可以消除企業(yè)的投機(jī)現(xiàn)象,但市場(chǎng)的激烈競(jìng)爭(zhēng)并未使企業(yè)僅僅變成自私自利的"怪獸"。此外,考慮到制度、市場(chǎng)、企業(yè)三個(gè)層面的情境效應(yīng),這兩種行為機(jī)制存在結(jié)構(gòu)差異與內(nèi)容差異。在三種情境下,政治聯(lián)系的工具行為機(jī)制對(duì)于制度環(huán)境變化最為敏感,相比而言,親社會(huì)行為機(jī)制對(duì)于市場(chǎng)不確定性變化更為敏感。這進(jìn)一步證實(shí),制度轉(zhuǎn)型并非直線式進(jìn)行,新時(shí)期政治聯(lián)系依然具有戰(zhàn)略價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:Are entrepreneurs' use of political connections purely self-interested? The discussion on this issue is helpful to the debate about whether the political connection in the period of transition is still of strategic value. This paper studies the use of political connections by entrepreneurs in the context of China's transition economy, puts forward a dual role model of instrumental and pro-social mechanisms, and makes use of the survey data of 363 enterprises in Jiangsu and Anhui provinces. The first stage mediated effect model is used for empirical test. The results show that the use of political connections of Chinese entrepreneurs is not purely egoism, but altruism. It is important to study the dark side and bright side in the context of entrepreneur political connection. The perfect institutional environment can eliminate the phenomenon of enterprise speculation, but the fierce competition in the market does not make the enterprise become a selfish monster. In addition, considering the situational effects of institutional, market and enterprise levels, there are structural differences and content differences between the two behavioral mechanisms. In the three situations, the instrumental behavior mechanism of political connection is the most sensitive to the change of institutional environment, while the pro-social behavior mechanism is more sensitive to the change of market uncertainty. This further confirmed that the institutional transformation is not straight-line, the new period of political ties still have strategic value.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)商學(xué)院;南京郵電大學(xué)理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(71272110、71572078)資助
【分類號(hào)】：D0;F272.91
，

本文編號(hào)：1987727