發(fā)布時間：2018-06-03 23:01

  本文選題：列寧 + 鄧小平　； 參考：《西北大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：加強權(quán)力制約與監(jiān)督是西方政治文明的優(yōu)秀成果之一,也是現(xiàn)代政治民主化進程中的重要內(nèi)容。加強對執(zhí)政黨的權(quán)力制約與監(jiān)督是馬克思主義的基本原則,是社會主義國家執(zhí)政黨鞏固執(zhí)政地位的必然要求。為優(yōu)化新型社會主義國家的政治發(fā)展,推進社會主義民主政治建設(shè),列寧鄧小平對如何加強權(quán)力制約與監(jiān)督進行了艱辛探索,并分別形成了完整科學(xué)的理論,這一理論是對馬克思主義創(chuàng)始人關(guān)于權(quán)力制約與監(jiān)督思想的繼承與發(fā)展,也是馬克思主義的重要組成部分之一。 列寧、鄧小平的權(quán)力制約與監(jiān)督思想既具有一致性,也存在一定的差異性。其一致性主要表現(xiàn)在：在理論淵源上存在一致性,都是對西方權(quán)力制約與監(jiān)督思想的借鑒,都是對馬克思主義創(chuàng)始人關(guān)于權(quán)力制約與監(jiān)督思想的發(fā)展；在理論品質(zhì)上存在一致性,都體現(xiàn)了實事求是和與時俱進的理論品質(zhì)；在內(nèi)容上存在一致性,都要求加強黨政權(quán)力的制約與監(jiān)督,重視堅持和健全民主集中制,強調(diào)以“權(quán)利制約權(quán)力”,并嚴(yán)懲濫用權(quán)力者,同各種不正之風(fēng)作斗爭。差異性主要表現(xiàn)在：權(quán)力制約與監(jiān)督在產(chǎn)生原因上的差異,主要有：時代背景不同,國內(nèi)條件不同,歷史原因不同；實踐形式上的差異,主要有：制度設(shè)計不同,機構(gòu)設(shè)置不同；權(quán)力制約與監(jiān)督的運行模式上存在差異；以及權(quán)力制約與監(jiān)督的核心不同等。比較分析列寧鄧小平權(quán)力制約與監(jiān)督思想,對于新時期我國加強權(quán)力制約與監(jiān)督具有重要啟示：要加強制度建設(shè),廉政建設(shè),法制建設(shè),加強對黨和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的制約與監(jiān)督,實行黨政分開,加強對權(quán)力客體的監(jiān)督作用等。
[Abstract]:Strengthening power restriction and supervision is one of the outstanding achievements of western political civilization, and it is also an important content in the process of modern political democratization. Strengthening the power restriction and supervision of the ruling party is the basic principle of Marxism and the inevitable requirement for the ruling party of the socialist country to consolidate its ruling position. In order to optimize the political development of new socialist countries and promote the construction of socialist democratic politics, Lenin Deng Xiaoping made arduous exploration on how to strengthen power restriction and supervision, and formed a complete and scientific theory respectively. This theory not only inherits and develops the thought of power restriction and supervision of the founder of Marxism, but also is one of the important components of Marxism. Lenin, Deng Xiaoping's thought of power restriction and supervision is not only consistent, but also different. Its consistency is mainly manifested in: there is consistency in the theoretical origin, which is the reference to the western thought of power restriction and supervision, as well as the development of Marxist founder's thought on power restriction and supervision; Consistency in theoretical quality reflects the theoretical quality of seeking truth from facts and keeping pace with the times; consistency in content requires strengthening the restriction and supervision of party and government power, attaching importance to upholding and perfecting democratic centralism, Emphasis is placed on restricting power by right, severely punishing those who abuse power, and fighting against all kinds of unhealthy tendencies. The differences are mainly reflected in the differences in the causes of power restriction and supervision, such as: different background of the times, different domestic conditions, different historical reasons, differences in practice forms, such as different system design, The institutional setting is different; the operation mode of power restriction and supervision is different; and the core of power restriction and supervision is not the same. A comparative analysis of Lenin's thought of power restriction and supervision in Deng Xiaoping has important implications for strengthening power restriction and supervision in China in the new period: strengthening the construction of system, building a clean government, building a legal system, strengthening the restriction and supervision of the Party and leading cadres, The party and government should be separated from each other and the supervisory function of the object of power should be strengthened.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：A821;A849.1;D035.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙君;劉繼峰;;列寧晚年“三位一體”的權(quán)力制約思想與實踐[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年03期

2 何增光;毛澤東的權(quán)力制約思想[J];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年06期

3 潘療星;鄧小平權(quán)力制約思想淺探[J];黨史研究與教學(xué);2004年06期

4 任雪麗;;馬克思恩格斯權(quán)力制約思想解讀[J];東岳論叢;2009年12期

5 常桂祥;學(xué)習(xí)鄧小平的權(quán)力制約思想[J];發(fā)展論壇;2000年02期

6 秦馨;;以鄧小平廉政制度建設(shè)思想為指導(dǎo) 強化一把手權(quán)力制約[J];黨史博采.理論;2006年09期

7 殷嘯虎,王志林,成兆奎;構(gòu)建有中國特色的權(quán)力制約機制——鄧小平權(quán)力監(jiān)督與制約思想研究[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年02期

8 郭艷;陳興瑪;;列寧的權(quán)力制約思想[J];科學(xué)社會主義;2008年02期

9 曲建武;鄧小平權(quán)力監(jiān)督與制約思想研究[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報;2004年05期

10 陳湘舸,包松,宋紅顏;列寧與鄧小平社會主義觀比較研究[J];毛澤東思想研究;2004年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 胡錦濤;[N];人民日報;2007年

，

本文編號：1974594