本文選題：公眾生活 + 事件性　； 參考：《探索與爭鳴》2017年04期

【摘要】：正"后真相"是一個很具穿透力和表現(xiàn)力的稱謂,也形象地描述了當(dāng)下時代的某些癥狀,屬于后的描述之一種,很典型。慕尼黑安全會議的會前報告,一連用了三個"后",即"后真相、后西方、后秩序",且以"后真相"打頭,引人注目。不過,相對于后真相時代這一有些夸大其詞的稱謂,我更愿意稱為"后真相世界"或"后真相現(xiàn)象"。而本文所關(guān)注的,是后真相世界在政治與公眾生活方面的民粹化現(xiàn)象。
[Abstract]:Positive "post-truth" is a very penetrating and expressive term, but also vividly describes some of the symptoms of the present era, belongs to one of the post-description, very typical. The Munich Security Conference's pre-session report uses three successive "hindrances", that is, "post-truth, post-western, post-order", and begins with "post-truth". However, I prefer to call it "post-truth world" or "post-truth phenomenon" rather than the posttruth era. This paper focuses on populism in politics and public life in the post-truth world.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)哲學(xué)學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D082
，

本文編號：1957442