本文關(guān)鍵詞：國際上的政治地理學(xué)研究進(jìn)展與啟示——對《Political Geography》雜志2005-2015年載文的分析，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

國際上的政治地理學(xué)研究進(jìn)展與啟示——對《Political Geography》雜志2005-2015年載文的分析

Progress in recent international political geography research：Towards an analysis of journal papers in Political Geography

[1] [2] [3] [4]

AN Ning,QIAN Junxi,CHEN Xiaoliang,ZHU Hong（1. Centre for Cultural Industry and Cultural Geography, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631 China; 2. School of Geographi

[1]華南師范大學(xué)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)與文化地理研究中心,廣州510631; [2]格拉斯哥大學(xué)地理與地球科學(xué)學(xué)院,英國格拉斯哥G128QQ

文章摘要：通過對國際上的政治地理學(xué)旗艦性雜志《Political Geography》2005-2015年期間391篇成果的分析,總結(jié)出國際政治地理學(xué)研究的主要研究議題為：邊境與邊界、環(huán)境政治、空間與尺度、領(lǐng)土和主權(quán)以及安全問題、選舉地理、社會和文化政治,其中空間與尺度、領(lǐng)土和主權(quán)以及安全問題、社會和文化政治幾個方向研究成果占較大比例,而其他三個方向則相對較少。通過研究方法分析發(fā)現(xiàn),國際政治地理學(xué)主要采用定性分析的方法,尤其是民族志和文本分析的方法,定量分析的使用存在一定的局限性。最后,從該雜志的研究對象和研究機(jī)構(gòu)兩個方面的分析歸納出：歐美主導(dǎo)的發(fā)達(dá)國家（尤其是英國和美國）對世界政治地理學(xué)話題的學(xué)術(shù)霸權(quán)與世界南、北差異發(fā)展具有一定的相關(guān)性。在中國綜合國力日漸增強(qiáng)、參與國際事務(wù)能力不斷提高以及作為新興的地緣政治力量崛起的社會歷史背景下,政治地理學(xué)經(jīng)世致用之能亟待被展現(xiàn)。因此,中國政治地理學(xué)發(fā)展作為發(fā)展中國家的聲音勢必將越來越洪亮。

Abstr：Political geography is an important sub- discipline of human geography. However,existing literature demonstrates that the political geography of China, especially research by indigenous scholars, has not been well represented in the discipline in general, including in international journals. Based on a systematic analysis of journal papers published in the key journal Political Geography over the last decade, this article considers the potential of political geographical research both of and in China. In so doing, this article foregrounds an overview of391 journal papers published from 2005 to 2015 in Political Geography, through which it concludes that the main themes of these papers can be generalized into six categories：borderlands and boundaries, environmental and climate politics, space and scale, security issues, electoral geography, and social and cultural politics. Among these, space and scale,security issues, and social and cultural politics have usually been understood as comprising the mainstream of political geography, while the others have been viewed as more subsidiary topics. Moreover, this article investigates the methods applied in the papers analyzed, among which qualitative analyses, especially ethnography and textual analysis, are identified as the leading methods, while the use of quantitative analysis has, to a certain extent, been criticized for its limitations. Finally, this article identifies the academic hegemony of developed countries in the Global North, especially the UK and the US, which have long held supremacy in international academia in general. A thorough examination of the research subjects and research institutions of the sampled papers shows that this trend is also reflected in inte

文章關(guān)鍵詞：

Keyword：:Political Geography Anglophone hegemony political geography study China

課題項(xiàng)目：國家重點(diǎn)基礎(chǔ)研究發(fā)展計(jì)劃（973）前期研究專項(xiàng)（2014CB460614）;國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目（41171125）;國家公派留學(xué)基金（201306380085）

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：國際上的政治地理學(xué)研究進(jìn)展與啟示——對《Political Geography》雜志2005-2015年載文的分析，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。