本文選題：社會(huì)正義　切入點(diǎn)：最低限度的民主　出處：《山東社會(huì)科學(xué)》2017年05期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)代西方復(fù)雜的社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)對(duì)自由民主模式的挑戰(zhàn)要求民主理論家們從理論上進(jìn)行建構(gòu)性回應(yīng)。在一種“緊縮策略”的民主構(gòu)想中,不僅把民主的價(jià)值意蘊(yùn)從民主的含義中剝離出來(lái)是可能的,而且民主制度與其價(jià)值規(guī)范也是相互分離甚至沖突的。一些分析馬克思主義政治理論家深受這種策略的影響并且宣稱(chēng)“最低限度的民主”不帶有任何規(guī)范性的承諾,其與“作為分配平等的社會(huì)正義”之間也是不相容的;相反協(xié)商民主理論家們則采取了“深化策略”,他們認(rèn)為協(xié)商民主不僅承諾民主具有規(guī)范性的內(nèi)涵,而且與“更廣泛的社會(huì)正義”之間具有“內(nèi)生”關(guān)系。從根源上說(shuō),現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的復(fù)雜性事實(shí)使得民主與正義無(wú)法在相互隔斷的狀態(tài)中加以考量和把握,甚至協(xié)商民主與社會(huì)正義在當(dāng)代社會(huì)背景下構(gòu)成了某種“相互詮釋”。雖然協(xié)商民主理論對(duì)西方民主理論進(jìn)行了深刻的內(nèi)在反思,但是由于絕大多數(shù)協(xié)商民主理論家是站在資本主義制度之內(nèi)修補(bǔ)自由民主的,因而協(xié)商民主發(fā)揮的功效是有限的。
[Abstract]:The challenge of contemporary western complex social reality to the model of liberal democracy requires democratic theorists to make a constructive response in theory. In a democratic conception of "austerity strategy", It is not only possible to strip the meaning of democracy from its meaning, And democracy and its values are separate and even conflicting. Some analytical Marxist political theorists are deeply influenced by this strategy and claim that "minimum democracy" has no normative commitment. It is also incompatible with "social justice as a distributive equality"; on the contrary, the theorists of consultative democracy have adopted a "deepening strategy", arguing that consultative democracy not only promises that democracy has normative connotations, And there is an "endogenous" relationship with "broader social justice". At its root, the complexity of modern society makes it impossible for democracy and justice to be considered and grasped in a state of separation. Even the consultative democracy and social justice constitute some kind of "mutual interpretation" in the contemporary social background. Although the theory of consultative democracy has deeply reflected on the western democratic theory, But because the vast majority of deliberative democracy theorists are standing within the capitalist system to repair liberal democracy, the effectiveness of consultative democracy is limited.
，

本文編號(hào)：1652426