【摘要】：成都教案是指1895年在成都及其周?chē)貐^(qū)發(fā)生的群眾反洋教的事件。1895年5月28日是中國(guó)農(nóng)歷傳統(tǒng)意義上的端午節(jié),因其是進(jìn)入五月以后第一個(gè)午日登高順陽(yáng)的好日子,故端午節(jié)又稱(chēng)作端陽(yáng)節(jié)。端陽(yáng)節(jié)當(dāng)天,為了慶祝節(jié)日,成都人民依照舊俗拋李作戲,一時(shí)間男女聚觀,好生熱鬧。此時(shí)有洋人混入觀看,但成都百姓因受謠言影響對(duì)洋人多有成見(jiàn),言語(yǔ)不合,爭(zhēng)端遂起,一時(shí)間憤怒的成都百姓打毀搶燒了成都地面各國(guó)教堂,由此引發(fā)震驚中外的成都教案。謠言,是指在事實(shí)不完整或是不充分的提前下,捏造出來(lái)并廣為傳播的不真實(shí)的言論。作為一種特殊的語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象,謠言往往是一種集體無(wú)意識(shí)的自然流露與宣泄。第二次鴉片戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)后,外國(guó)傳教士憑借條約的保護(hù)進(jìn)入川省,由于東西方文化的差異以及教士及其教民多行不法,民教沖突不斷。百姓對(duì)洋人多存疑慮,且矛盾重重,一時(shí)間謠言四起。在成都教案中,謠言作為一根主線與教案發(fā)展相始終。教案發(fā)生后中外雙方從各自的利益角度出發(fā),對(duì)謠言的反應(yīng)態(tài)度不一,由此展開(kāi)了種種博弈。最終,中外雙方達(dá)成了共識(shí),謠言問(wèn)題得到處理,同時(shí)也代表了成都教案的結(jié)束。本文共分四個(gè)部分。第一部分介紹甲午戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)前洋教在四川的傳入與發(fā)展,主要包括洋教在四川的早期傳入、鴉片戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)以后在四川的發(fā)展以及由于洋教的迅猛發(fā)展而導(dǎo)致的民教沖突。第二部分介紹1895年成都教案前的謠言分析,大體包括謠言傳播的內(nèi)容、形式以及成都教案前謠言的肆行。第三部分介紹成都教案中有關(guān)謠言問(wèn)題的中外交涉與處理,大致包括中外交涉中的謠言問(wèn)題及其對(duì)謠言問(wèn)題的處理,謠言問(wèn)題得到了處理也宣告了教案的結(jié)束。第四部分結(jié)語(yǔ)。
[Abstract]:The Chengdu case refers to the mass anti-foreign religious incident that took place in and around Chengdu in 1895. May 28, 1895, is the Dragon Boat Festival in the traditional sense of the Chinese lunar calendar, because it is the first good day since May to reach Gao Shun Yang. Therefore, Dragon Boat Festival is also known as Duanyang Festival. Duanyang Day, in order to celebrate the festival, Chengdu people in accordance with the old custom cast Li as a play, a time of men and women gathered to live lively. At this time, foreigners mingled in to watch, but Chengdu people because of the influence of rumors to foreigners more prejudice, words, disputes, a time angry Chengdu people destroyed and robbed the churches on the ground in Chengdu, thus triggering a shocking Chinese and foreign Chengdu religious case. A rumor is an untrue statement that is fabricated and widely disseminated in advance of incomplete or inadequate facts. As a special language phenomenon, rumor is often a kind of collective unconscious natural disclosure and catharsis. After the second Opium War, foreign missionaries entered Sichuan Province by virtue of the protection of treaties. People have more doubts about foreigners, and contradictions, a time rumors began. In Chengdu teaching case, rumor as a main line and teaching plan development has always been. After the teaching plan happened, the Chinese and foreign sides reacted differently to the rumor from the angle of their own interests. In the end, the Chinese and foreign sides reached a consensus, the rumor problem was dealt with, but also represents the end of the Chengdu teaching case. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the introduction and development of the foreign religion in Sichuan before the Sino-Japanese War, including the early introduction of the foreign religion in Sichuan, the development of the foreign religion in Sichuan after the Opium War and the conflicts between the people and the religion caused by the rapid development of the foreign religion. The second part introduces the rumor analysis before the teaching case in Chengdu in 1895, including the content and form of the rumor dissemination and the unscrupulous behavior of the rumor before the teaching case in Chengdu. The third part introduces the Chinese and foreign negotiation and handling of rumors in Chengdu teaching case, including the rumor problem and its treatment in the Chinese and foreign negotiations, which has been dealt with and declared the end of the teaching plan. The fourth part is conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K256.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡曉;;清末法國(guó)傳教士在四川教案中的處境及與地方官員的關(guān)系——從成都教案到義和團(tuán)運(yùn)動(dòng)[J];宗教學(xué)研究;2015年01期

2 楊鵬程;王洪銘;;瘟疫、謠言與社會(huì)恐慌——以湖南為例的研究[J];云夢(mèng)學(xué)刊;2014年06期

3 吳佩林;李升濤;;近三十年來(lái)關(guān)于明清告示的整理與研究[J];西華師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年03期

4 陶超;;謠言與成都教案[J];中小企業(yè)管理與科技(中旬刊);2014年04期

5 李重華;;川東教案的運(yùn)行態(tài)勢(shì)研究[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年06期

6 李安定;;“反洋教運(yùn)動(dòng)”揭帖傳播范式的歷時(shí)性研究[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年05期

7 趙鑒軍;;從書(shū)文揭帖看清末反洋教[J];湖北函授大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

8 黃亦君;李曉蘭;;清末教案頻繁發(fā)生原因探析[J];貴州文史叢刊;2008年01期

9 鄧常春;;督促與應(yīng)對(duì):晚清教務(wù)教案中中央政府與地方官的互動(dòng)[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2005年12期

10 董叢林;“迷拐”、“折割”傳聞與天津教案[J];近代史研究;2003年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄧常春;晚清四川教務(wù)教案視野中的官紳民教及其互動(dòng)（1860-1911）[D];四川大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 梅爽;鼠疫與謠言[D];東北師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2198521