本文選題：亡國(guó)史 + 中韓關(guān)系�。� 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：日韓合并之后,中國(guó)出現(xiàn)了大量對(duì)朝鮮亡國(guó)過(guò)程、亡國(guó)原因、亡國(guó)影響進(jìn)行敘述或評(píng)析的書(shū)籍與文章,本文將之統(tǒng)稱(chēng)為“朝鮮亡國(guó)著述”。這類(lèi)書(shū)籍和文章是研究近代中國(guó)人對(duì)朝鮮亡國(guó)問(wèn)題認(rèn)知的第一手資料,也是透視近代中國(guó)與朝鮮半島關(guān)系、近代中國(guó)人對(duì)東亞和世界認(rèn)知的窗口。本文主要對(duì)這一類(lèi)史料進(jìn)行搜集、整理,對(duì)近代中國(guó)的朝鮮亡國(guó)著述的特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行歸納與比較分析,梳理其中呈現(xiàn)的多樣化觀點(diǎn),希望為今后的進(jìn)一步研究打下基礎(chǔ)。 最早討論朝鮮亡國(guó)議題的是1904年《新民從報(bào)》連載的梁?jiǎn)⒊冻r亡國(guó)史略》。依據(jù)載體的不同,朝鮮亡國(guó)著述可分書(shū)藉與報(bào)刊兩種形式。最早的論述朝鮮亡國(guó)主題的書(shū)籍是1911年6月出版于上海的《近世亡國(guó)史》�，F(xiàn)存的這類(lèi)書(shū)籍共有十四種,包括專(zhuān)論朝鮮事務(wù)的單行本三種,匯集朝鮮及其他各亡國(guó)史事的合編本七種,小說(shuō)演義四種。這十四種書(shū)籍中,出版于上海的有十三種、出版于北京的一種。以媒體報(bào)道形式出現(xiàn)的亡國(guó)論述主要出現(xiàn)在1904年到1911年之間,1911年以后逐漸減少。 作為“殷鑒”目的而寫(xiě)作的朝鮮亡國(guó)著述,“宣傳性”表現(xiàn)得特別明顯,并且都特別注重分析朝鮮亡國(guó)的原因。1915年以前的論述往往指朝鮮的內(nèi)部落后因素是其亡國(guó)的根本原因,隨著中日關(guān)系的日益緊張和中國(guó)社會(huì)對(duì)日態(tài)度的變化,日本的強(qiáng)權(quán)侵略逐漸被認(rèn)為是朝鮮亡國(guó)的首要原因。與此相伴的,朝鮮人的形象從天性的“亡國(guó)奴”變?yōu)椤叭珖?guó)民氣一致憤激的民族”,而對(duì)日本在朝鮮半島殖民統(tǒng)治的評(píng)價(jià),則由中性轉(zhuǎn)向貶斥。因此,作為一種文化符號(hào)的“朝鮮”,很大程度上是由中國(guó)知識(shí)分子因應(yīng)本國(guó)的局勢(shì)而塑造出來(lái)的。從朝鮮亡國(guó)中能得到什么教訓(xùn),比朝鮮亡國(guó)本身更加重要。
[Abstract]:After the merger of Japan and South Korea, a large number of books and articles about the process of Korean subjugation, the cause of subjugation and the influence of subjugation appeared in China. This kind of books and articles are the first-hand materials to study the understanding of Korean subjugation in modern China, and also the window of understanding the relationship between China and the Korean Peninsula and the cognition of East Asia and the world in modern China. This paper mainly collects and collates this kind of historical data, sums up and compares the characteristics of the works of Korean subjugation in modern China, combs the diversified viewpoints presented therein, and hopes to lay a foundation for further research in the future. The earliest topic to discuss the subject of Korean subjugation was Liang Qichao, A History of Korean subjugation, published in the New people's Daily in 1904. According to the carrier, North Korea can be divided into two forms: books and newspapers. The earliest book on the subject of Korean subjugation was published in Shanghai in June 1911. There are 14 kinds of such books, including three monographs devoted to Korean affairs, seven kinds of compilation of Korean and other history of subjugation, and four kinds of novels. Thirteen of these 14 books are published in Shanghai and one in Beijing. The exposition of national subjugation in the form of media reports mainly appeared between 1904 and 1911, and gradually decreased after 1911. North Korea's writings on national subjugation, which were written for the purpose of "Yin Jian", were particularly obvious and paid special attention to the analysis of the reasons for Korea's subjugation. Prior to 1915, it was often pointed out that the internal backwardness of the DPRK was the fundamental cause of its subjugation. With the increasing tension between China and Japan and the change of Chinese society's attitude toward Japan, Japanese power aggression is gradually regarded as the primary cause of Korean subjugation. At the same time, the image of Korean changed from the nature of "subjugated slaves" to "the whole nation", and the evaluation of Japanese colonial rule on the Korean peninsula changed from neutral to derogatory. Therefore, North Korea, as a cultural symbol, was shaped largely by Chinese intellectuals in response to the situation in their own country. What lessons can be learned from North Korea's subjugation is more important than North Korea's subjugation itself.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K257

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 延棠;;金正恩:矚目的朝鮮“80后”[J];w，

本文編號(hào)：2118202