本文選題：惡劣紳衿 + 晚清文獻　； 參考：《江西社會科學》2017年03期

【摘要】：在晚清文獻中"惡劣紳衿"的記載數(shù)量巨大。但細究這些記載,可根據(jù)語境分不同情境做出不同類型的劃分,所謂的"惡劣紳衿"有實際性、防亂性與襯托性三種表達類型。實際性的"惡劣紳衿"確實存在,但出于防亂性、襯托性的表達往往給人"惡劣紳衿"存在程度之嚴重的印象。出于防亂性的表達多見于歷年奏報,記載中很難見到具體的惡劣行為,而以襯托方式記載的惡劣紳衿更有為突出某位官員或某位地方正直人物而以惡劣紳衿作為其行為對照,加以強調(diào);有時為強調(diào)某一地區(qū)的吏治民風之刁頑,也存在著夸大惡劣紳衿之惡行的現(xiàn)象。對于清代文獻中頻繁出現(xiàn)的"惡劣紳衿"的仔細酌量和進一步考釋,或可窺見晚清政權(quán)在強化"公權(quán)力"、打擊地方離心勢力方面所做的清障努力。
[Abstract]:In the literature of the late Qing Dynasty, the record of "bad gentry Jin" was huge. However, these records can be divided into different situations according to the context. The so-called "evil gentry Jin" has three kinds of expression types: practical, anti-disorder and contrasting. The actual "bad gentry Jin" does exist, but the expression of "abominable gentry Jin" often gives a serious impression of the existence degree of "abominable gentry Jin". The expression of anti-disorder is more common in the newspapers of the past years, and it is very difficult to see any concrete bad behavior in the records. However, the evil gentry recorded by way of setting off is more likely to highlight a certain official or a local upright person and use the evil gentry Jin as the contrast of his behavior. In order to emphasize the obstinate style of local officials, there is also the phenomenon of exaggerating the evil behavior of the evil gentry. The careful discretion and further study of the "bad gentry Jin" frequently appeared in the literature of the Qing Dynasty may be a glimpse of the efforts made by the late Qing regime to strengthen the "public power" and crack down on the local centrifugal forces.
【作者單位】： 廈門大學歷史系;
【分類號】：K252
，

本文編號：2100805