本文選題：庚子事變 + 現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型�。� 參考：《北京大學(xué)》2011年博士論文

【摘要】：本文以“庚子事變”這一中國(guó)近代歷史上發(fā)生的重大事件為研究對(duì)象。該概念在文中所指向的史實(shí),乃是以庚子(1900)三月、義和團(tuán)在帝國(guó)政治中心——北京城內(nèi)迅速蔓延開來為起始,以五月至七月、中外之間發(fā)生正面戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的階段為重心,以《辛丑和議》簽訂以后、兩宮回鑾、帝國(guó)恢復(fù)正常的統(tǒng)治秩序作為結(jié)束。 歷來的研究,多以“義和團(tuán)運(yùn)動(dòng)”之名,將義和團(tuán)自興起至1901年和約締訂作為一個(gè)完整的過程來敘述,而1900年中清廷宣戰(zhàn)、聯(lián)軍入侵、兩宮出狩的過程則被納入和視作這一運(yùn)動(dòng)進(jìn)程的高潮部分。其實(shí),自從清廷對(duì)義和團(tuán)公開表示肯定、進(jìn)而向外人“宣戰(zhàn)”之時(shí)起,義和團(tuán)事件的性質(zhì)已經(jīng)發(fā)生了質(zhì)的變化：從帝國(guó)內(nèi)部的地方性動(dòng)亂,升級(jí)成為中國(guó)與列強(qiáng)之間的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)。本文以“庚子事變”為題,即是試圖在已有的“義和團(tuán)運(yùn)動(dòng)”這一概念中,抽離出其中的異質(zhì)部分,凸顯庚子年義和團(tuán)事件發(fā)生質(zhì)變之后的進(jìn)程與面相,將其作為一段相對(duì)獨(dú)立的歷史進(jìn)程來予以考察。 在文章開篇的“總述”部分,筆者首先對(duì)“庚子事變”的歷史進(jìn)程、1900年間的南方局勢(shì)與南北關(guān)系、以及庚子文學(xué)書寫的主要特征作了整體性的介紹和梳理。第二、三兩章則選擇具體的人物、文本、事件與話題,以個(gè)案的方式,討論個(gè)體人物在庚子事變中的境遇以及相關(guān)的文學(xué)書寫,通過細(xì)節(jié)的鉤沉和現(xiàn)場(chǎng)的還原,力圖呈現(xiàn)事變的諸種具體面相。在第四、五、六各章中,分別討論了庚子對(duì)于傳統(tǒng)的巨大沖擊、清末民間開智運(yùn)動(dòng)的興起以及北京城市轉(zhuǎn)向現(xiàn)代這三個(gè)不同層面的論題,試圖揭示庚子對(duì)清末十年的帝國(guó)面貌所造成的重大影響。 在研究方法上,本文主要以實(shí)證的方式,通過相關(guān)檔案、報(bào)刊、筆記與文學(xué)作品等多種類型史料的梳理,試圖盡可能全面的呈現(xiàn)庚子事變?cè)诙嘀貙用嫔系臍v史圖景。文章以“文明沖突”的思路看待事變的發(fā)生,注重于當(dāng)時(shí)的輿論、時(shí)人的心態(tài)、文學(xué)的反映以及與之相關(guān)的社會(huì)思潮與歷史影響的探尋,最終試圖見出庚子事變?cè)谕砬宓蹏?guó)現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型進(jìn)程中所具有的特殊意義,并就文明轉(zhuǎn)型的現(xiàn)實(shí)問題略有思考和論析。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the "Gengzi incident", a major event in the modern history of China. The historical facts of the concept in this paper are the Boxer Troupe spread rapidly in the political center of the Empire, Beijing in March, with the center of gravity from May to July, when there was a direct war between China and China. After the signing of Xin Chou and the Congresses, the two courts returned to order and the Empire returned to normal order. In the name of the "Boxer Regiment Movement", the Boxer Regiment was described as a complete process from its rise to 1901. In 1900, the Qing Dynasty declared war and the Allied invasion. The process of the two houses out of the hunt is included and regarded as the climax of the movement. In fact, since the Qing Dynasty publicly affirmed the Yihetuan, and then declared war on outsiders, the nature of the Boxer incident has changed qualitatively: from the local turmoil within the empire to the war between China and the powers. In this paper, the title of "Boxer incident" is to try to draw out the heterogeneity in the concept of "Boxer Tuan Movement", and to highlight the process and face after the qualitative change of Boxer Troupe event in Boxer year. Take it as a relatively independent historical process to examine. In the part of "General description" at the beginning of the article, the author first introduces and combs the historical process of "the Gengzi incident" and the relations between the south and the south during 1900, and the main characteristics of the Boxer's literature writing. Second, in the third and second chapters, we choose specific characters, texts, events and topics to discuss the circumstances of individual characters in the Gengzi incident and the relevant literary writing in a case study, through the detail hooks and the restoration of the scene. Try to present the concrete aspects of the incident. In the fourth, fifth and sixth chapters, the thesis discusses the three different aspects of the impact of Boxer on tradition, the rise of the folk intellectual opening movement in the late Qing Dynasty and the shift of Beijing city to modern times. This paper tries to reveal the great influence of Gengzi on the imperial appearance in the late Qing Dynasty. In the research method, this article mainly by the empirical way, through the correlation archives, the newspaper, the note and the literature works and so on many kinds of historical data combing, attempts to present as comprehensively as possible the Boxer incident in the multi-level historical picture. The article looks at the occurrence of the incident with the idea of "clash of civilizations", paying attention to the public opinion at that time, the mentality of people, the reflection of literature, and the exploration of the social trend of thought and historical influence related to it. Finally, the author tries to find out the special significance of the Gengzi incident in the process of the modern transformation of the empire in the late Qing Dynasty, and to think and analyze the practical problems of the civilization transformation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：K256.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 方國(guó)武;;批評(píng)的理論視角變遷——晚清譴責(zé)小說研究的歷時(shí)述評(píng)[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

2 夏曉虹;吳趼人與梁?jiǎn)⒊P(guān)系鉤沉[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年06期

3 陳平原;;城闕、街景與風(fēng)情——晚清畫報(bào)中的帝京想象[J];北京社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年02期

4 帥建祥;清末巡警制度述論[J];四川師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年02期

5 歐陽(yáng)健;;福州近代文化巨人林紓在晚清[J];閩江學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

6 關(guān)曉紅;;議修京師貢院與科舉制的終結(jié)[J];近代史研究;2009年04期

7 王學(xué)鈞;李伯元與“譴責(zé)小說”的興起[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年05期

8 何玲;清末經(jīng)濟(jì)特科探析[J];歷史檔案;2004年01期

9 孔祥吉;晚清知識(shí)分子的悲劇——從陳鼎和他的《校悹廬抗議別論》談起[J];歷史研究;1996年06期

10 莊月江;“九牧紅巾之禍亂”及其他[J];明清小說研究;1995年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王奎軍;歷史、文學(xué)文本、文學(xué)價(jià)值——以賽金花題材文學(xué)作品為個(gè)案[D];暨南大學(xué);2001年

2 陸玉芹;庚子事變中被殺五大臣研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2005年

3 黃慶林;義和團(tuán)運(yùn)動(dòng)時(shí)期清政府守舊派思想研究[D];北京師范大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 章芝;彭翼仲年譜[D];南昌大學(xué);2006年

2 李曉濤;清代蒙古族詩(shī)人延清及其《庚子都門紀(jì)事詩(shī)》[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2006年

3 高雅琳;《清議報(bào)》與義和團(tuán)運(yùn)動(dòng)[D];河南大學(xué);2008年

4 錢秀飛;《中外日?qǐng)?bào)》視野下的義和團(tuán)運(yùn)動(dòng)[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年

5 余鵬;晚清報(bào)人彭翼仲研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1976221