本文選題：糞溺 + 肥料��； 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2010年博士論文

【摘要】： 糞溺是中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)業(yè)中最重要的肥料,它關(guān)系著農(nóng)民的生計(jì),在傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)中具有重要意義。同時(shí),它也屬于衛(wèi)生問(wèn)題,特別是在西方近代衛(wèi)生觀念輸入中國(guó)后,糞溺衛(wèi)生方面的含義得到了凸顯。城市管理者汲取近代文明的理念,將本是由民間社會(huì)主導(dǎo)的糞溺清理納入政府行為,并用近代公共衛(wèi)生觀念對(duì)之進(jìn)行了規(guī)范。但由于農(nóng)村大部分還處在傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)中,農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)還在傳統(tǒng)的技術(shù)、水平上運(yùn)行,糞溺在農(nóng)村可用作農(nóng)田肥料,產(chǎn)生經(jīng)濟(jì)利益�；谥袊�(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)的傳統(tǒng),特別是農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)的技術(shù)及水平,糞溺這種經(jīng)濟(jì)層面上的意義逐漸使之衍化成一種利益資源。 在中國(guó)近代社會(huì)時(shí)常會(huì)產(chǎn)生糞溺糾紛,其原因表面上看似不同,但都涉及到利益之爭(zhēng),爭(zhēng)奪的焦點(diǎn)是糞溺的擁有權(quán)(控制權(quán)),只不過(guò)在近代衛(wèi)生的語(yǔ)境下,糞溺糾紛被表面上的“衛(wèi)生”、“公共衛(wèi)生”、“城市管理”、“城市文明”等話語(yǔ)所覆蓋,其背后所涉的資源、利益的爭(zhēng)奪實(shí)質(zhì),卻被掩蓋了。 本論文通過(guò)還原出一副糾紛場(chǎng)景,從橫向和縱向的交叉點(diǎn)探討其產(chǎn)生的原因,分析糾紛產(chǎn)生的時(shí)代傳承性及時(shí)代錯(cuò)位感,從而豐富我們對(duì)該類(lèi)問(wèn)題的理解,使我們?cè)诹硪粋�(gè)層面加深對(duì)農(nóng)業(yè)、農(nóng)村問(wèn)題的認(rèn)識(shí)。
[Abstract]:Dung drowning is the most important fertilizer in Chinese traditional agriculture, which relates to farmers' livelihood and plays an important role in traditional agricultural production. At the same time, it also belongs to the health problem, especially after the western modern hygienic concept was imported into China, the meaning of dung drowning was highlighted. Drawing on the concept of modern civilization, urban managers brought the excrement cleaning, which was originally dominated by civil society, into the government's behavior, and standardized it with the modern concept of public health. However, most of the rural areas are still in the traditional society, the agricultural economy is still in the traditional technology, the level of operation, dung drowning in the countryside can be used as farmland fertilizer, resulting in economic benefits. Based on the tradition of Chinese agriculture, especially the technology and level of agricultural production, the economic significance of dung drowning has gradually evolved into a kind of benefit resource. In modern China, disputes about dung addiction often occur. The reasons appear to be different on the surface, but they all involve the contention of interests. The focus is on the ownership of dung drowning (control power, but in the context of modern health). The disputes of dung drowning are covered by such words as "sanitation", "public health", "urban management", "urban civilization" and so on, but the essence of the competition for resources and interests involved in them is concealed. By reducing a set of dispute scenes, this paper discusses the causes of the disputes from the horizontal and vertical intersections, analyzes the inheritance of the disputes and the sense of dislocation of the times, thus enriches our understanding of this kind of problems. So that we at another level to deepen the understanding of agriculture, rural issues.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K265

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 杜麗紅;1930年代的北平城市污物管理改革[J];近代史研究;2005年05期

2 蔣賢斌;彭善民;;公共衛(wèi)生與城市現(xiàn)代性:1898—1949年的上海[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年03期

3 劉岸冰;;近代上海城市環(huán)境衛(wèi)生管理初探[J];史林;2006年02期

4 蘇智良;彭善民;;公廁變遷與都市文明——以近代上海為例[J];史林;2006年03期

5 鄭祖安;“浦東”歷史發(fā)展概說(shuō)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);1983年09期

6 辛圭煥;;20世紀(jì)30年代北平市政府的糞業(yè)官辦構(gòu)想與環(huán)境衛(wèi)生的改革[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)歷史評(píng)論;2007年00期

7 何小蓮;論中國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生事業(yè)近代化之濫觴[J];學(xué)術(shù)月刊;2003年02期

8 鐘少華;;略論中國(guó)近代衛(wèi)生觀念與衛(wèi)生事業(yè)的起源[J];自然辯證法通訊;2007年02期

9 彭善民;;商辦抑或市辦:近代上海城市糞穢處理[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)史研究;2007年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張仲民;閱讀、表達(dá)與集體心態(tài)[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1853478