近代上海保障性住房融資實(shí)踐評(píng)析——基于1927-1937年的研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-04-27 12:52
本文選題:國家與社會(huì) + 保障性住房��; 參考:《山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2016年05期
【摘要】:20世紀(jì)二三十年代,為解決棚戶居民的居住問題,上海市政府開展了平民住房救助活動(dòng)。在平民住房興建中,因市財(cái)政的困局,上海市政府不得不向企業(yè)、銀行借貸,以及通過各種舉措引導(dǎo)激發(fā)民間社會(huì)籌資的多元融資模式。然而,高額借貸興建致使保障性住房因還本付息的無奈而失去了"廉租性",從而背離了市府最初救助棚戶居民的施救旨趣;民間社會(huì)因"建筑平民住宅不易生利"之故,對(duì)市府歷次激勵(lì)、呼喚表現(xiàn)出異常的"鎮(zhèn)定"與"無趣"。民間社會(huì)"無動(dòng)"的背后潛藏的是對(duì)自身利益的盤算與權(quán)衡,雖然政府與民間社會(huì)二者是相互依存、相互滲透的,但各自又擁有認(rèn)同與接納對(duì)方的條件與底線。
[Abstract]:In the 1920s and 1930s, in order to solve the housing problems of shanty residents, the Shanghai Municipal Government carried out housing relief activities for civilians. In the construction of civilian housing, the Shanghai municipal government has had to borrow from enterprises, banks and, through various measures, the diversified financing model that inspires civil society to raise funds, because of the financial difficulties of the city. However, the construction of high loans led to the loss of "low rent" of affordable housing because of the helplessness of servicing capital and interest, which deviated from the city government's original purport of rescuing squatter residents; civil society, because "it is not easy to make profits by building civilian homes," To the city government every time, call to show unusual "calm" and "boring". What is hidden behind the "immobility" of civil society is the calculation and weighing of its own interests. Although the government and civil society are interdependent and permeate each other, they each have the conditions and the bottom line to identify with and accept the other side.
【作者單位】: 太原科技大學(xué)思政部;
【基金】:教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)青年基金項(xiàng)目“民國上海住房救助研究(1927-1937)”(14YJC770020);教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究專項(xiàng)任務(wù)項(xiàng)目“山西抗日根據(jù)地中共社會(huì)動(dòng)員與鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)重構(gòu)”(15JDSZK008)
【分類號(hào)】:F299.29;F832.9;K263
,
本文編號(hào):1810803
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/1810803.html
教材專著