本文選題：19世紀60年代　切入點：河南　出處：《河北師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：基督教傳入河南地區(qū)由來已久,雖然清朝康、乾之后受到政府禁教政策的制約,但長時間里在部分地方仍有地下隱蔽的傳教活動。1860年之后,基督教在中國內(nèi)地傳教“合法化”,“傳教”活動轉(zhuǎn)入地上并洶洶發(fā)展,民教之間的沖突亦隨之加劇,19世紀60年代該省區(qū)即進入教案的多發(fā)階段。根據(jù)資料統(tǒng)計,1860—1869年之間,河南地區(qū)總共發(fā)生教案達20起,并且教案形態(tài)紛繁復(fù)雜,本文根據(jù)特定標準,將其分為置產(chǎn)類案件、排拒教士或毆辱教民類案件以及含混無果類案件三大類別。至于教案的發(fā)生原因,考察認為亦非絕對的“侵略與反侵略”所致,應(yīng)該說既有教會勢力強橫的原因,亦有民教之間“誤會”的因素,當然,前者還是最根本的。在對本時段內(nèi)河南地區(qū)教案統(tǒng)觀的基礎(chǔ)上,本文進而特別選擇其中最典型的三起案事,對其處置詳情予以考察分析。從這三起典型案件來看,中、外官方均參與到案件的處置過程中來。從教士處得知案情后,法國政府駐華機構(gòu)往往偏聽其一面之詞,武斷地干預(yù)涉案地的司法審判。面對法方的干預(yù),清方參與處置的各級官府,一般尚能據(jù)理力爭,并未發(fā)現(xiàn)明顯的甘愿己方屈枉而失職、舞弊的行為。在此期河南教案的處置過程中,傳教士利用特權(quán)干涉司法訴訟等行為,對于起碼形式上是由清朝官方主導(dǎo)的司法審判,還有其官、紳統(tǒng)治階層的原有地位,都造成巨大沖擊。當?shù)厣鐣兄饾u形成了以教士為核心的特殊利益集團,與清方官、紳階層,與更廣大的民眾,展開激烈角逐,這在當時河南社會也成為一種醒目現(xiàn)象。本文通過具體研究該期河南地區(qū)教案,對上述各方面的情況予以揭示。
[Abstract]:Christianity has been introduced into Henan for a long time. Although the Qing Dynasty was restricted by the government's policy of banning religion after the Qing Dynasty and the dry period, there were still underground missionary activities in some parts of the country for a long time. After 1860, Christianity "legalized" preaching in the mainland of China.The "missionary" activities turned to the ground and developed aggressively, and the conflicts between the people and the religion also intensified. In the 1860s, the province and the autonomous region entered the stage of frequent teaching plans.From 1860 to 1869, there were 20 teaching cases in Henan Province, and the forms of teaching plans were complicated. According to the specific standards, this paper divides the teaching plans into cases of property purchase.Rejection of cleric or affront cases and vague and fruitless three categories of cases.As for the cause of the teaching plan, it is not the result of absolute "aggression and anti-aggression". It should be said that there are both the reasons of the influence of the church and the "misunderstanding" between the people and the religion. Of course, the former is still the most fundamental.On the basis of the whole view of teaching case in Henan area, this paper chooses the most typical three cases, and analyzes the details of their disposal.From these three typical cases, both Chinese and foreign officials are involved in the process of handling the case.After learning of the case from the clergyman, the French government agencies in China often listen to his side and interfere arbitrarily with the judicial trial in the place where the case is concerned.In the face of the intervention of the French side, the Qing government at all levels involved in the disposal, generally can still argue, did not find that willing to be wronged and dereliction of duty, fraud.In the course of dealing with the religious cases in Henan Province, missionaries used privileges to interfere in judicial proceedings, which caused a great impact on the judicial trials, which were dominated by the Qing government in the form at least, as well as the original position of their officials and gentry ruling class.The local society gradually formed a special interest group with the clergy as the core, and engaged in fierce competition with the Qing government officials, the gentry class and the wider public, which also became an eye-catching phenomenon in Henan society at that time.By studying the teaching cases in Henan province, this paper reveals the above aspects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：K256.8

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅萍;;近代西方傳教活動與晚清鄉(xiāng)土社會秩序的裂變[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2005年12期

2 張廣智;近代中國對基督教入華的回應(yīng)──一項現(xiàn)代新史學(xué)的理論詮釋[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1998年03期

3 虞和平;;從河南教案看民國后中國官民對洋教態(tài)度和教案性質(zhì)的變化[J];貴州社會科學(xué);1986年06期

4 莫宏偉,郭漢民;清政府與近代中國教案[J];貴州文史叢刊;2003年02期

5 黃亦君;李曉蘭;;清末教案頻繁發(fā)生原因探析[J];貴州文史叢刊;2008年01期

6 李亦釗;;近代“南陽教案”的特點和動因分析[J];安陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年04期

7 王宗虞;辛亥革命時期河南人民的革命斗爭[J];開封師院學(xué)報;1962年01期

8 張連波 ,張九洲;二十世紀初河南人民的反洋教斗爭[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1986年01期

9 盧仲維;鄉(xiāng)紳與反洋教運動[J];近代史研究;1986年01期

10 王立新;晚清政府對基督教和傳教士的政策[J];近代史研究;1996年03期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 董叢林;;中國近代的“教案”、“反對外國教會侵略”和“反洋教”辨析[A];歷史與現(xiàn)實論稿[C];1991年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 鄧常春;晚清四川教務(wù)教案視野中的官紳民教及其互動（1860-1911）[D];四川大學(xué);2005年

2 劉安榮;本土化進程中的山西天主教、教徒及官教、民教關(guān)系[D];山西大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 樊孝東;晚清直隸教案述論[D];河北大學(xué);2003年

2 劉珂;和局思想對清政府處理教案方針政策的影響——以貴陽教案、天津教案、巨野教案為中心[D];華南師范大學(xué);2004年

3 劉立冬;1870年至1895年直隸教案中的地方外交[D];河北師范大學(xué);2007年

4 吳文博;天朝與列強的棋子——清末教案研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

5 曹林林;十九世紀下半葉山東教案中的官紳民教及其互動[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

6 羅穎;教案與晚清官員處罰[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1726393