本文選題：國(guó)營(yíng)企業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：權(quán)力關(guān)系　出處：《中共黨史研究》2017年05期

【摘要】：本文利用對(duì)不同城市近百位退休工人的訪談,重新考察改革前30年國(guó)營(yíng)企業(yè)內(nèi)部的政治生活,重點(diǎn)探討工廠車間干部與群眾之間以及積極分子與普通工人之間的日常關(guān)系。本文質(zhì)疑"新傳統(tǒng)主義"理論在解釋改革以前中國(guó)國(guó)營(yíng)企業(yè)內(nèi)部微觀政治生活的有效性,認(rèn)為干部與工人之間在某些特定的歷史條件下的確存在不同程度的庇護(hù)與依賴關(guān)系,但強(qiáng)調(diào)當(dāng)時(shí)車間內(nèi)部的日常權(quán)力關(guān)系也受到諸多正式的和非正式的制度的制約。文章最后提出"單位社群主義"的概念,用來(lái)解讀毛澤東時(shí)代國(guó)營(yíng)企業(yè)的日常治理實(shí)踐。
[Abstract]:This paper makes use of interviews with nearly 100 retired workers in different cities to re-examine the political life within the state-owned enterprises 30 years before the reform, focusing on the daily relations between factory workshop cadres and the masses and between activists and ordinary workers.This paper questions the validity of the theory of "neo-traditionalism" in explaining the micro-political life in Chinese state-owned enterprises before the reform, and holds that there is indeed a different degree of sheltering and dependence relationship between cadres and workers under certain historical conditions.However, it is emphasized that the daily power relations within the workshop were also restricted by many formal and informal systems.Finally, the article puts forward the concept of "unit communitarianism", which is used to interpret the daily governance practice of state enterprises in Mao Zedong's time.
【作者單位】： 美國(guó)德克薩斯大學(xué)奧斯汀校區(qū)歷史系;上海交通大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;江蘇省社會(huì)科學(xué)院中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義理論研究中心;
【分類號(hào)】：F279.29;K27
，

本文編號(hào)：1708663