本文選題：中國(guó)東北　切入點(diǎn)：偽滿洲國(guó)　出處：《東北師范大學(xué)》2011年博士論文

【摘要】：九一八事變之后,日本建立了偽滿洲國(guó),對(duì)東北地區(qū)各族人民進(jìn)行了長(zhǎng)達(dá)14年之久的殖民統(tǒng)治。在此期間,日本為了穩(wěn)定其殖民統(tǒng)治,一方面對(duì)東北地區(qū)的主要民族漢、滿、蒙、鮮等民族采取了高壓、籠絡(luò)、利用、同化等政策;另一方面對(duì)本民族采取了特殊化政策。除此之外,對(duì)于人口數(shù)比較少,地處邊疆地區(qū)的少數(shù)民族,則采取慘無人道的滅絕政策。這一系列違背社會(huì)歷史發(fā)展規(guī)律的的殖民地民族政策不僅阻礙了東北各民族的正常發(fā)展,而且導(dǎo)致了東北地區(qū)各民族之間的民族隔閡。為此,通過分析日本對(duì)偽滿洲國(guó)推行的民族政策,來揭露日本帝國(guó)主義者的險(xiǎn)惡之本質(zhì)。 論文正文共分為六個(gè)部分。 第一部分主要敘述九一八事變前日本對(duì)東北地區(qū)的侵略預(yù)謀以及九一八事變爆發(fā)的經(jīng)過和偽滿洲國(guó)的成立。其次通過偽滿洲國(guó)建國(guó)前簽訂的賣國(guó)條約、協(xié)定來揭露偽滿洲國(guó)政權(quán)的傀儡性,說明偽滿洲國(guó)的建立并非是東北各族人民的意愿,而是日本帝國(guó)主義欺世盜名的行徑而已。此外,本章中略述偽滿洲國(guó)時(shí)期東北地區(qū)的各民族自然狀況。 第二部分主要敘述偽滿洲國(guó)時(shí)期,日本對(duì)東北地區(qū)本民族采取的特殊化政策。主要分析日本在偽滿洲國(guó)時(shí)期獲得并行使的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、軍警與司法方面的特殊化政策以及待遇。政治方面日本通過中央行政機(jī)構(gòu)中的總務(wù)廳中心和地方行政機(jī)構(gòu)中的日本人參事官制度來享受其特殊待遇。經(jīng)濟(jì)上日本通過高額薪金、津貼以及帶有民族等級(jí)差別的“糧谷配給”來維持其腐化的生活,并且從東北各族手中掠奪大量土地,成為了東北的新型地主,奴役東北地區(qū)各族人民。 第三部分主要敘述日本對(duì)滿族、蒙族利用與控制政策。首先日本竭盡全力地拉攏溥儀,使溥儀心甘情愿地投入日本人的“懷抱”,并且建立了偽滿洲國(guó)。之后日本一方面滿足偽滿皇帝在物質(zhì)方面和精神方面虛榮心,同時(shí)安插耳目時(shí)刻監(jiān)視和監(jiān)督偽滿皇帝的一舉一動(dòng)。此外,日本通過“政治聯(lián)姻”的方法,來制造帶有日本血統(tǒng)的第二代傀儡人物。對(duì)于蒙古族上層采取了安撫、收買、利用政策,九一八事變前,日本早已對(duì)東北地區(qū)蒙古王公采取了收買和利用政策,通過支持蒙古王公的“蒙古獨(dú)立”、“蒙古自治”活動(dòng),企圖使內(nèi)蒙古脫離中國(guó)政權(quán)。偽滿洲國(guó)成立之后,日本對(duì)蒙古族上層采取了安撫和利用政策。初期為求穩(wěn)定日本對(duì)蒙古王公采取了安撫政策,沿用并保持以前蒙古封建王公制度和權(quán)利。偽滿洲國(guó)政權(quán)穩(wěn)定之后,日本廢除了蒙古王公制度,同時(shí)為了安撫蒙古王公,在經(jīng)濟(jì)上給予了高額補(bǔ)助。此外,日本利用蒙古族驍勇善戰(zhàn)的習(xí)性,指使蒙古族敗類組建偽蒙古騎兵,幫日寇鎮(zhèn)壓和屠殺東北各族人民。 第四部分主要敘述日本對(duì)東北地區(qū)朝鮮族的利用和強(qiáng)制同化政策。朝鮮族是一個(gè)跨境民族。從20世紀(jì)初,開始大規(guī)模地移居到東北,經(jīng)過與其他民族一道建設(shè)和開發(fā)東北疆域的過程中,逐漸融合于東北各民族大家庭中。偽滿洲國(guó)時(shí)期,日本把朝鮮族視為“最容易接近皇國(guó)臣民”的人,并將其地位提高至“準(zhǔn)高等民族”(日本人視本民族為高等民族,然把蒙、滿、漢民族為低等民族或者野蠻民族)地位,實(shí)施拉攏。實(shí)際上能夠享受“準(zhǔn)高等”民族待遇的只是一小撮朝鮮族親日分子。廣大朝鮮族人民與其他民族一樣深受日本殖民統(tǒng)治和壓迫。這里值得一提的是日本對(duì)朝鮮族人民實(shí)行了帶有民族同化內(nèi)容的“皇民化”政策,通過禁止朝鮮族人們使用本民族語言,強(qiáng)制性地普及日語,進(jìn)行“創(chuàng)氏改名”來把朝鮮族同化為日本民族。 第五部分中主要敘述了日本對(duì)漢民族采取的民族高壓統(tǒng)治政策。政治方面,日本對(duì)為數(shù)眾多的漢民族采取了一個(gè)前所未有的鎮(zhèn)壓政策。為了便于統(tǒng)治日本對(duì)漢民族上層人物采取了既利用,又壓制的政策。對(duì)于廣大下層漢民族人們采取了鎮(zhèn)壓政策。由于以漢民族人民為主導(dǎo)的東北抗日斗爭(zhēng)聲勢(shì)浩大,日本采取了“歸村并屯”政策。雖然切斷人民與抗日隊(duì)伍的聯(lián)系,但導(dǎo)致了廣大漢民族人民被迫離開故土,流離失所。在經(jīng)濟(jì)方面日本采取了殘酷的掠奪政策,利用日本民族搶奪漢民族人們的土地,制定“糧谷出荷”政策,掠奪大量的糧食。制定“糧谷配給”政策,不斷縮小漢民族人民的糧食需求。對(duì)城市中的工人采取低工資、低待遇政策,使得廣大漢民族工人陷入極度貧困。對(duì)于文化教育方面,日本采取了愚民奴化政策,企圖把廣大漢民族人民變?yōu)橹矣谌毡局趁窠y(tǒng)治的“順民”。 第六部分主要論述了偽滿洲國(guó)時(shí)期日本對(duì)東北地區(qū)少數(shù)民族統(tǒng)治政策。偽滿洲國(guó)建國(guó)初期,日本無暇顧及這些為數(shù)較少的民族,對(duì)這些民族采取了暫時(shí)利用的政策,利用一小撮民族敗類組織“山林隊(duì)”、“山林警察隊(duì)”,配合關(guān)東軍“討伐”和鎮(zhèn)壓抗日聯(lián)軍。偽滿洲國(guó)政權(quán)穩(wěn)定之后,日本改變對(duì)東北少數(shù)民族的暫時(shí)利用政策,采取了慘絕人寰的滅絕政策,使得少數(shù)民族受到了嚴(yán)重的摧殘。
[Abstract]:After the 918 incident, Japan established a puppet regime in Manchuria, the people of all ethnic groups in Northeast China for more than 14 years of colonial rule. In the meantime, in order to stabilize the Japanese colonial rule, on the one hand, the main ethnic groups in Northeast Han, full, Mongolia, fresh nation to take the high pressure, win, utilization, assimilation policy; on the other hand to take the special policy of the nation. In addition, the population is relatively small, the minority is located in the border area, to extinction. This series of policies to be brutal and inhuman violation of the law of social and historical development of the colonial national policy not only hinder the normal development of the ethnic minorities in Northeast China. But lead among different ethnic groups in Northeast China national barriers. Therefore, through the analysis of the Japanese puppet regime in Manchuria on the implementation of national policy, to expose the Japanese imperialist evil nature.
The text of the paper is divided into six parts.
The Japanese invasion of Northeast China and 918 premeditated incident broke out the first part mainly narrates the 918 incident before and after the establishment of the puppet regime in Manchuria. Followed by the traitorous treaty signed before the puppet regime in Manchuria, the puppet regime in Manchuria pseudo disclosure agreements, the establishment of the puppet Manchuria government is not the will of the people of all ethnic groups in Northeast China. But the Japanese imperialists fradulent acts. In addition, this chapter outlines the puppet regime in Manchuria in Northeast China during the national natural condition.
The second part mainly describes the pseudo period of Manchuria country, Japan on special measures in this region. The main analysis of the Japanese nation to take exercise and political, in the puppet regime in Manchuria during the period of economic policy, special police and judicial and political benefits. Japan through the system of general office center and local administrative institutions in central administrative institutions in the Japanese staff officer to enjoy the special treatment. The economy Japan by high salary, allowances and a national level difference of "grain ration" to maintain its corrupt life, and from the northeast of the family had seized a lot of land, become the new landlord of the northeast, the people of all ethnic groups in Northeast China. Slavery
The third part mainly narrates the Japanese of Manchu, Mongolian and the control policy. Firstly, Japan to draw the Puyi, into the Japanese Puyi most willing to embrace, and established a puppet regime in Manchuria. After a Japanese puppet emperor to meet the material and spiritual aspects of vanity, and install and time monitoring and supervision of the puppet emperor every act and every move. In addition, Japan through a "political marriage", made with the second generation of Japanese descent. The figurehead of Mongolian upper take comfort, buy, use policy, 918 incident, Japan had taken to buy and use policy to the northeast region of Mongolia through the support of the princes, the princes of Mongolia "Mongolia independence", "Mongolia autonomous" activities, trying to separate Inner Mongolia from Chinese. After the establishment of Manchuria puppet regime of Mongolian, Japan took the upper Comfort and use policy. The early stability of Japan in Mongolia the adopt a conciliatory policy, use and maintain in Mongolia before the feudal royal system and rights. The puppet Manchuria regime stability after Japan abolished the princes of Mongolia system, at the same time in order to appease the princes of Mongolia, in the economy given high subsidies. In addition, the Japanese use of the Mongolian troops the habits of Mongolian scum formation of pseudo ordered Mongolia cavalry, help Japanese repression and killing the northeast people of all ethnic groups.
The fourth part focuses on the use of Japanese Korean in Northeast China and forced assimilation policy. Korean is a cross-border ethnic groups. From the beginning of twentieth Century, began a large-scale emigration to the northeast, after together with other ethnic groups, the construction and development of the Northeast territory in the process of gradual integration in the big family of all nationalities in the northeast. The puppet regime in Manchuria during the period of Japanese, Korean is regarded as "the most accessible Imperial Subjects", and its status will be raised to "quasi national higher" (Japanese as the nation for national higher, but the full, Mongolian, Han nationality or ethnic low Savage nation) position, implementation can actually enjoy "to win. Quasi national treatment only a handful of higher molecular masses. Korean Pro Japanese Korean people and other ethnic groups as well as by the Japanese colonial rule and oppression. It is worth mentioning here is that the Japanese to Korean people carried out with people The policy of "Huang Min" of assimilating content is to prohibit Koreans from using their native language, to popularize Japanese compulsively, and to rename the Korean nationality into Japanese nation by renaming it.
The fifth part mainly describes the national policy adopted Japanese coercion on the Han nationality. The political aspect, Japan adopted a policy of repression of the hitherto unknown number of Han nationality. In order to facilitate the rule of Japan on the upper figure of Han nationality were taken by both, and the policy of repression. For the majority of Chinese people have taken a lower the policy of suppression. The Northeast Anti Japanese struggle as great in strength and impetus to the Han ethnic people oriented, Japan adopted the "return to the village and the village" policy. Although the people's Anti Japanese team and cut off contact, but caused wide ethnic Han people were forced to leave their homeland, displaced. In economic terms Japan has taken a brutal predatory policy, the Japanese national snatch Han people of the land, making "grain load" policy, a large number of predatory food. Make "grain rationing" policy, shrinking Chinese people's food Needs. Take low wage workers in the city, low treatment policy, making the Guangzhou Han minority workers into extreme poverty. For culture and education, Japan adopted the obscurantist policy of enslavement, attempting to wide the Han nationality people into loyal to the Japanese colonial rule of the "obedient."
The sixth part mainly discusses the period of Japanese puppet regime in Manchuria on the northeast minority rule policy. The puppet regime in Manchuria in the early days of Japan to attend to the small number of people, for the nation to take a temporary use of the policy, with a handful of scum of the nation "mountain forest organization team", "forest police team", with the Kwantung Army "crusade" and the suppression of the Anti Japanese coalition. The puppet Manchuria regime change in Japan after a stable, northeast minority temporarily use policy, take the extremely brutal extermination policies make minority, has been seriously ruined.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：K265.6

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 郭艷;;“親善”背后的猙獰——侵華時(shí)期日本對(duì)華民族分化政策的SWOT分析[J];青海民族研究;2014年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 斯欽巴圖;東蒙古殖民地社會(huì)與文化的變動(dòng)（1931-1945）[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1655923