本文選題：遼朝 + 和魯斡��； 參考：《民族研究》2014年01期

【摘要】：《遼史》記載,道宗弟和魯斡在天祚朝被冊封為"皇太叔",而近年出土的遼代石刻卻稱其封號為"皇太叔祖",論者大多認為《遼史》當有奪文。其實這個問題并非如此簡單。本文通過文獻考索及遼朝政治文化分析得出的結論是,和魯斡的"皇太叔"封號是無可置疑的,它體現了遼朝獨具特色的皇位繼承制度以及"沿名之風"的政治文化特征。至于遼代石刻中的"皇太叔祖",則可能是墓志作者按照漢人的倫理觀念,根據和魯斡的行輩加以修正的,不宜據此輕易否定《遼史》的記載。
[Abstract]:It is recorded in the History of Liao that Daozong's younger brother and Lu Wu were canonized as "emperor's uncle" in the Tianzuo dynasty, while the stone carvings of Liao Dynasty unearthed in recent years called it "emperor's uncle". In fact, the problem is not so simple. Based on the textual research of literature and the analysis of political culture of Liao Dynasty, this paper draws the conclusion that there is no doubt that the title of "Emperor's uncle" of Horu Wu is indisputable, and it embodies the unique inheritance system of the imperial throne and the political and cultural characteristics of "the wind along the name" in the Liao Dynasty. As for the "Emperor's uncle and ancestors" in the stone carvings of the Liao Dynasty, it may be that the epitaph authors revised it according to the ethical concept of Han people, according to the line generation of Horu Wu, and should not easily deny the records of Liao Shi.
【作者單位】： 北京大學歷史學系;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學重點研究基地北京大學中國古代史研究中心重大項目“北族王朝的政治文化特征——以遼金為中心”(項目編號:13JJD770003)的階段性研究成果 教育部“博士研究生學術新人獎”資助
【分類號】：K246.1
，

本文編號：1897423