本文關(guān)鍵詞：《春秋》中的“空白”敘事:“闕文”與“不書”　出處：《文史哲》2015年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 《春秋》 三《傳》 空白敘述 闕文 不書

【摘要】："闕文"與"不書"為《春秋》中"空白敘述"的兩種表述形態(tài),前者是一種"待書寫",后者則是指向"空白"的"已書寫",而非"未書寫"。"待書寫"、"已書寫"、"未書寫",筆者實已對《春秋》本文作出對于"空白"三態(tài)之區(qū)分。"闕文"語出《論語》,被孔子用來指稱史官、書寫與傳統(tǒng)的關(guān)系;"不書"則系出于三《傳》,用以解釋《春秋》中的"賦義"何以與無形之文的"空白敘述"有關(guān)。因此,《春秋》中的"空白"狀態(tài)是可以被解釋的,三《傳》后學(xué)能在"不書"與"闕文"之間進行"空白"態(tài)為"待書寫"或是"已書寫"的意義認知轉(zhuǎn)換,就是最好的例子。自書寫學(xué)上對《春秋》本文中"空白"形態(tài)的研究是重要的,不僅是對"空白"三態(tài)的區(qū)分,尤其是對"闕文"與"不書"的區(qū)分,它暗示了早期有一種書寫行動,在這行動中有一種"空白"意識之察覺,卻沒有訴諸"文字"之有形;它更是一種特殊的"書寫"立場:一旦我們在《春秋》"上下文"間揭示出一種"空白敘述"時,"空白"也就與有形符號一樣,也是一種書寫符號,必須加以閱讀及解讀。
[Abstract]:"lack" and "no book" are two forms of "blank narration" in Spring and Autumn period. The former is "to be written" and the latter is "written" to point to "blank". Instead of "not writing", "to be written", "already written", "not written", the author has actually made a distinction between "blank" and "blank" in this paper. Confucius used to refer to historians, writing and traditional relations; Therefore, the "blank state" in the "Spring and Autumn" can be explained by explaining why the "meaning of Fu" in the Spring and Autumn period is related to the "blank narration" of the invisible text. The third "Biography" can transform the meaning of "blank" into "to be written" or "already written" between "not writing" and "lack of writing". This is the best example. The study on the form of "blank" in "Spring and Autumn" is important, not only the distinction between "blank" and "blank", especially the distinction between "absence" and "no book". It implies an early writing action in which there is a perception of "blank" consciousness, but no recourse to the "writing" of the tangible; It is a special "writing" position: once we reveal a "blank narrative" in the context of "Spring and Autumn", the "blank" is as much a writing symbol as a tangible symbol. It must be read and interpreted.
【作者單位】： 臺灣佛光大學(xué);
【分類號】：K225.04
【正文快照】： 一、前言(一)《春秋》與“annals”波蘭學(xué)者托波爾斯基(Topolski)曾從內(nèi)容上的時間性,將歷史敘事(historical narratives)區(qū)分為三種理想型(ideal type):年鑒(annals)、編年史(chronicles),及一種更為嚴謹?shù)臍v史敘事——編史學(xué)(historiography)。托波爾斯基其實仍認為年鑒是較

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孟峰;戰(zhàn)國子書編纂研究[D];河南大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1363958