本文選題：一帶一路 + 倡議��； 參考：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】："一帶一路"倡議的提出,使得沿線各國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)合作趨勢(shì)增強(qiáng),這為我國(guó)的產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩行業(yè)提供的了新的發(fā)展機(jī)遇。以產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩問(wèn)題相對(duì)突出的鋼鐵業(yè)為例,分析發(fā)現(xiàn)轉(zhuǎn)移鋼鐵業(yè)過(guò)剩產(chǎn)能給我國(guó)帶來(lái)了除了化解過(guò)剩產(chǎn)能以外的利益,對(duì)于"一帶一路"沿線國(guó)家也有很大的利益,因此我國(guó)鋼鐵業(yè)過(guò)剩產(chǎn)能向"一帶一路"沿線國(guó)家轉(zhuǎn)移具有巨大的動(dòng)力。通過(guò)分析我國(guó)鋼鐵業(yè)所面臨的現(xiàn)有形勢(shì),發(fā)現(xiàn)"一帶一路"沿線各國(guó)鋼鐵需求量十分龐大以及"一帶一路"沿線國(guó)家的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施相對(duì)薄弱但是卻又強(qiáng)勁的發(fā)展勢(shì)頭。因此肯定了我國(guó)鋼鐵業(yè)過(guò)剩產(chǎn)能向"一帶一路"沿線國(guó)家轉(zhuǎn)移的可能性,并且提出了我國(guó)可以從貿(mào)易和對(duì)外投資兩條路徑來(lái)化解過(guò)剩產(chǎn)能,通過(guò)貿(mào)易將我國(guó)鋼鐵業(yè)過(guò)剩產(chǎn)品進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)移,通過(guò)對(duì)外投資將我國(guó)鋼鐵業(yè)過(guò)剩產(chǎn)業(yè)進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)移。從國(guó)外需求拉動(dòng)角度應(yīng)用UNCOMTRADE鋼鐵業(yè)主要商品貿(mào)易數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行微觀分析后發(fā)現(xiàn),我國(guó)向"一路"沿線國(guó)家的出口額明顯要高于向"一帶"國(guó)家,因此,我國(guó)鋼鐵業(yè)應(yīng)將"一路"國(guó)家以及"一帶"沿線的發(fā)展中經(jīng)濟(jì)體轉(zhuǎn)移過(guò)剩產(chǎn)能。從過(guò)剩產(chǎn)能海外轉(zhuǎn)移的供給角度,應(yīng)用經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展基礎(chǔ)指標(biāo)、全球治理指標(biāo)、經(jīng)濟(jì)自由度指數(shù)等制度環(huán)境質(zhì)量指標(biāo),綜合考慮各國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略、與中國(guó)的產(chǎn)業(yè)互補(bǔ)性及政治關(guān)系進(jìn)行分析后發(fā)現(xiàn),我國(guó)應(yīng)在控制投資風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的前提下,向"一帶一路"沿線國(guó)家進(jìn)行投資以轉(zhuǎn)移鋼鐵業(yè)過(guò)剩產(chǎn)能�；谫Q(mào)易基礎(chǔ)和投資機(jī)會(huì),結(jié)合"一帶一路"倡議要求,有關(guān)方面應(yīng)從基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)、貿(mào)易促進(jìn)及投資平臺(tái)搭建、增強(qiáng)互信、化解風(fēng)險(xiǎn)等方面采取措施,促進(jìn)我國(guó)鋼鐵業(yè)過(guò)剩產(chǎn)能的化解。
[Abstract]:The proposal of "Belt and Road" has strengthened the trend of economic cooperation among the countries along the route, which provides a new development opportunity for China's overcapacity industries. Taking the steel industry, which has a relatively prominent problem of overcapacity, as an example, it is found that the transfer of excess capacity in the steel industry has brought China benefits other than resolving excess capacity, and has great benefits for the countries along the route of "Belt and Road". Therefore, China's steel industry excess capacity transfer to "Belt and Road" along the country has a huge power. By analyzing the present situation of China's steel industry, it is found that the demand for iron and steel is very large in the countries along "Belt and Road" and that the infrastructure is relatively weak but the development momentum is strong in the countries along the line of "Belt and Road". Therefore, it affirms the possibility of transferring the excess capacity of China's steel industry to the countries along "Belt and Road", and points out that our country can resolve the excess capacity from the two ways of trade and foreign investment. The surplus steel industry of our country is transferred through trade, and the surplus industry of steel industry is transferred through foreign investment. From the point of view of foreign demand pulling, it is found that the export value of China to the countries along the "one Road" is obviously higher than that of the countries along the "one Road" by using the main commodity trade data of UNCOMTRADE steel industry. China's steel industry should transfer excess capacity to the "one Road" country and developing economies along the "one Road" line. From the point of view of the supply of excess capacity transfer overseas, applying the basic indicators of economic development, the index of global governance, the index of economic freedom and other institutional environmental quality indicators, and considering comprehensively the economic development strategies of various countries, Based on the analysis of industrial complementarity and political relations with China, it is found that China should invest in the countries along "Belt and Road" in order to transfer the excess production capacity of steel industry on the premise of controlling investment risk. Based on the trade basis and investment opportunities, and in conjunction with the "Belt and Road" initiative, relevant parties should take measures in the areas of infrastructure construction, trade promotion and investment platform building, strengthening mutual trust, and mitigating risks. China's steel industry to promote the solution of excess capacity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F426.31

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 倪中新;盧星;薛文駿;;“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略能夠化解我國(guó)過(guò)剩的鋼鐵產(chǎn)能嗎——基于時(shí)變參數(shù)向量自回歸模型平均的預(yù)測(cè)[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2016年03期

2 劉瑞;高峰;;“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略的區(qū)位路徑選擇與化解傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2016年01期

3 趙文報(bào);李英;;河北省借“一帶一路”化解過(guò)剩產(chǎn)能的對(duì)策建議[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2015年21期

4 趙明亮;楊蕙馨;;“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略下中國(guó)鋼鐵業(yè)過(guò)剩產(chǎn)能化解:貿(mào)易基礎(chǔ)、投資機(jī)會(huì)與實(shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)制[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年04期

5 徐念沙;;“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略下中國(guó)企業(yè)走出去的思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2015年03期

6 劉建江;羅雙成;凌四立;;化解產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩的國(guó)際經(jīng)驗(yàn)及啟示[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2015年06期

7 吳頻;;中國(guó)企業(yè)“走出去”與開展國(guó)際產(chǎn)能合作[J];對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)實(shí)務(wù);2015年05期

8 蘇杭;;“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略下我國(guó)制造業(yè)海外轉(zhuǎn)移問(wèn)題研究[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2015年03期

9 陳巖;翟瑞瑞;;對(duì)外投資、轉(zhuǎn)移產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩與結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年01期

10 袁新濤;;“一帶一路”建設(shè)的國(guó)家戰(zhàn)略分析[J];理論月刊;2014年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 朱利;光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1841985