糾錯(cuò)性反饋一直是二語(yǔ)習(xí)得領(lǐng)域研究的熱門話題,許多研究者都致力于研究糾錯(cuò)性反饋的有效性,但到目前為止并無(wú)定論。原因就在于語(yǔ)言學(xué)習(xí)是一個(gè)復(fù)雜的認(rèn)知過程,個(gè)體的認(rèn)知差異對(duì)語(yǔ)言學(xué)習(xí)的效果起著至關(guān)重要的作用。因此本研究嘗試將認(rèn)知因素―工作記憶考慮在內(nèi)去探討工作記憶容量的有效性。本研究嘗試去探索是否糾錯(cuò)性反饋對(duì)不同工作記憶容量的學(xué)生有顯著不同的效果,然后再進(jìn)一步研究對(duì)于工作記憶容量高的學(xué)生來說,哪種反饋效果較好以及對(duì)于工作記憶容量低的學(xué)生來說,哪種反饋效果較好。本研究采用定量研究方法,以虛擬語(yǔ)氣為目標(biāo)語(yǔ)言結(jié)構(gòu),選取河北正定中學(xué)60名高二學(xué)生作為被試進(jìn)行了為期五周的實(shí)驗(yàn),通過SPSS(13.0版本)對(duì)收集的實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)工作記憶容量作為認(rèn)知因素,對(duì)于糾錯(cuò)性反饋(重述和元語(yǔ)言反饋)的效果具有影響作用。即同一種糾錯(cuò)性反饋對(duì)于工作記憶容量高的學(xué)生的效果顯著好于工作記憶容量低的學(xué)生。同時(shí)對(duì)于工作記憶容量高的學(xué)生,元語(yǔ)言提示的效果略微好于重述反饋,但是這兩種反饋方式的效果并未形成顯著性差異。而工作記憶容量低的學(xué)生,兩種糾錯(cuò)性反饋(重述和元語(yǔ)言提示)則具有顯著性差異。元語(yǔ)言提示的效果顯著好于重述。本研究...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：57 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
List of Abbreviation
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Background and purpose of the study
    1.2 Structure of the thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Corrective feedback
        2.1.1 Definition of corrective feedback
        2.1.2 Classification of corrective feedback
        2.1.3 Recast and metalinguistic feedback
    2.2 Working memory capacity
        2.2.1 Introduction of working memory
        2.2.2 Measurement of working memory capacity
    2.3 Related studies at home and abroad
        2.3.1 Studies on corrective feedback at home and abroad
        2.3.2 Studies on the interaction between working memory capacity and theeffects of corrective feedback at home and abroad
    2.4 Theoretical background
        2.4.1 The noticing hypothesis
        2.4.2 The resource sharing theory
Chapter Three Research Design
    3.1 Research questions
    3.2 Research participants
    3.3 Research Instruments
        3.3.1 Listening span test
        3.3.2 Pretest and posttest
    3.4 Research procedures
        3.4.1 Listening span test
        3.4.2 Pretest
        3.4.3 Corrective Feedback Treatment
        3.4.4 Posttest
    3.5 Data collection
        3.5.1 Data collection of listening span test
        3.5.2 Data collection of pretest and posttest
    3.6 Data analysis
Chapter Four Results and Discussion
    4.1 Results
        4.1.1 Descriptive statistics of listening span test
        4.1.2 Descriptive statistics of pretest
        4.1.3 Descriptive statistics of posttest
    4.2 Discussion
        4.2.1 Discussion on research question one
        4.2.2 Discussion on research question two
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major findings
    5.2 Implications
    5.3 Limitations of the study and suggestions for suture studies
References
Appendix Ⅰ Listening Span Test
Appendix Ⅱ Pretest
Appendix Ⅲ Post-test
Appendix Ⅳ Oral Translation Task
Acknowledgements



本文編號(hào)：3796337