發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-13 12:16

【摘要】：目前Rosenberg自尊量表的相關(guān)研究仍存在較多爭(zhēng)議,如因素分析中自尊量表呈現(xiàn)的多維結(jié)構(gòu)是自尊特質(zhì)的多種維度還是其他因素造成的因子?正向自尊題目和反向自尊題目是否測(cè)量同一自尊特質(zhì)?自尊量表的措辭效應(yīng)性是否區(qū)別于特質(zhì)因素?措辭效應(yīng)具有跨量表的穩(wěn)定性嗎?為解決上述問(wèn)題,本研究選用Rosenberg自尊量表(RSES)、雙元孝道量表(DFPS)和自我監(jiān)控力(SMS)等量表,對(duì)量表所有題目進(jìn)行語(yǔ)義反轉(zhuǎn),形成陳述方向相反但表達(dá)意思相同的反轉(zhuǎn)量表。從中國(guó)東部某高校隨機(jī)選取1300名大學(xué)生作為研究對(duì)象進(jìn)行施測(cè),剔除回答不完整的問(wèn)卷后,得有效被試1198人,占總被試人數(shù)的92.1%,其中男生696人(58%),女生502人(42%),平均年齡為18.7(SD=1.05),為了分析正反向題目對(duì)自尊量表帶來(lái)的影響,我們對(duì)自尊量表的各個(gè)版本進(jìn)行信度和驗(yàn)證性因素分析(CFA),比較正反向陳述題目的措辭效應(yīng)對(duì)量表帶來(lái)的信度和效度上的影響,最后采用多種量表同時(shí)進(jìn)行CFA的方法來(lái)檢測(cè)不同測(cè)量工具中的措辭效應(yīng)的關(guān)系。研究結(jié)果表明:(1)正反向題目具有相同的測(cè)量學(xué)性能,正反向措辭效應(yīng)能夠嚴(yán)重影響量表的結(jié)構(gòu)效度。(2)在中國(guó)被試中,自尊量表的正反向題目都存在措辭效應(yīng),而且措辭效應(yīng)所解釋的變異比重小于特質(zhì)因子變異。(3)措辭效應(yīng)并沒(méi)有破壞自尊量表的單維結(jié)構(gòu),正向自尊題目和反向自尊題目測(cè)量的是同一自尊構(gòu)念;同樣,措辭效應(yīng)也沒(méi)有破壞孝道量表的結(jié)構(gòu),而孝量表本身是單維的因素結(jié)構(gòu)。(4)在自尊、孝道、一般健康量表中的措辭效應(yīng)高度一致,措辭效應(yīng)具有跨量表的穩(wěn)定性,我們將措辭效應(yīng)視為一種穩(wěn)定的反應(yīng)風(fēng)格或人格特質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:At present, there are still many disputes about the related research of Rosenberg self-esteem scale. For example, the multidimensional structure of self-esteem scale in factor analysis is a multi-dimension of self-esteem traits or a factor caused by other factors. Does the forward self-esteem problem and the reverse self-esteem problem measure the same self-esteem traits? Is the worded effect of the self-esteem scale different from the trait factors? Does the wording effect have the stability of cross-scale? In order to solve the above problems, the Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES), dual filial piety scale (DFPS) and self-monitoring (SMS) were used to reverse all the problems of the scale and form a reverse scale with the opposite direction of statement but the same meaning. 1300 college students were randomly selected from a university in eastern China as the subjects of the study. After excluding the incomplete questionnaire, 1198 valid subjects, accounting for 92.1% of the total number of subjects, were selected, including 696 boys (58%) and 502 girls (42%), with an average age of 18.7 (SD=1.05). In order to analyze the impact of positive and negative questions on the self-esteem scale, We analyze the reliability and validity of each version of the self-esteem scale by (CFA), to compare the influence of the wording effect of the positive and negative statement questions on the reliability and validity of the scale. Finally, we use the method of multiple scales to detect the relationship between the wording effects in different measurement tools by using the method of CFA at the same time. The results show that: (1) the positive and negative questions have the same measuring performance, and the positive and negative wording effects can seriously affect the structural validity of the scale. (2) in the Chinese subjects, the positive and negative questions of the self-esteem scale have the wording effect, and the proportion of variation explained by the wording effect is smaller than that of the trait factor variation. (3) the wording effect does not destroy the one-dimensional structure of the self-esteem scale. The positive self-esteem problem and the reverse self-esteem problem measure the same self-esteem construction. Similarly, the wording effect does not destroy the structure of the filial piety scale, and the filial piety scale itself is a single-dimensional factor structure. (4) in self-esteem, filial piety and general health scale, the wording effect is highly consistent, and the wording effect has the stability of the cross-scale. We regard the wording effect as a stable reaction style or personality trait.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B841.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 楊廷忠,黃麗,吳貞一;中文健康問(wèn)卷在中國(guó)大陸人群心理障礙篩選的適宜性研究[J];中華流行病學(xué)雜志;2003年09期

，

本文編號(hào)：2498523