發(fā)布時間：2019-04-28 17:38

【摘要】：為了解兩種情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略(表達(dá)抑制與認(rèn)知重評)對不同心理彈性物質(zhì)成癮者干擾抑制的影響,本研究以150名女子吸毒強戒人員(高彈性組80人,低彈性組70人)為被試,采用經(jīng)典Stroop任務(wù)范式進(jìn)行了兩項實驗研究。結(jié)果表明:1、在運用表達(dá)抑制調(diào)節(jié)策略進(jìn)行情緒調(diào)節(jié)后,高心理彈性組被試的抑制控制能力與低心理彈性組差異顯著,高心理彈性組被試的抑制控制能力顯著強于低心理彈性組。2、在運用認(rèn)知重評調(diào)節(jié)策略進(jìn)行情緒調(diào)節(jié)后,高心理彈性組被試的抑制控制能力與低心理彈性組差異顯著,高心理彈性組被試的抑制控制能力顯著高于低心理彈性組。3、Stroop任務(wù)中,字義字色不一致的情況下被試得分最低,無關(guān)情況下得分稍高于不一致情況,字義字色一致情況下得分最高。4、在認(rèn)知重評下,情緒啟動類型對不同任務(wù)類型結(jié)果所造成的影響不同,積極情緒對抑制能力有顯著提升作用,而消極的情緒喚起讓被試抑制干擾能力更低。本研究結(jié)論如下:無論啟動視頻的性質(zhì)是積極或消極,在表達(dá)抑制或認(rèn)知重評的情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略下,高心理彈性高的物質(zhì)成癮者的干擾抑制能力顯著強于低心理彈性的物質(zhì)成癮者。
[Abstract]:In order to understand the effects of two emotional regulation strategies (expression inhibition and cognitive reassessment) on interference inhibition of different psychoelastic substance addicts, 150 female drug abstinents (80 in high elasticity group and 70 in low elasticity group) were selected as subjects. Two experimental studies are carried out using the classical Stroop task paradigm. The results were as follows: (1) after emotion regulation with expression inhibition and regulation strategy, the inhibition and control ability of high psychoelasticity group was significantly different from that of low psychoelastic group, and there was significant difference between high psychoelastic group and low psychoelastic group. The ability of inhibition and control in the high psychoelastic group was significantly stronger than that in the low psycho-elastic group. 2. After emotional adjustment with cognitive re-evaluation adjustment strategy, the inhibition and control ability in the high psychoelastic group was significantly higher than that in the low psychoelastic group, and there was significant difference between the high psychoelastic group and the low psychoelastic group. 3. In Stroop task, the score was the lowest in the case of inconsistency of meaning and character, and slightly higher in unrelated cases than in the case of inconsistency, and the control ability of the subjects in high psychoelasticity group was significantly higher than that in low psychoelastic group. 3) in Stroop task, the score was the lowest in the case of inconsistency. The highest score was obtained in the case of word-meaning-word-color consistency. 4. Under the cognitive reassessment, the effect of emotional priming type on the results of different task types was different, and the positive emotion had a significant effect on the inhibition ability. Negative emotional arousal reduced the ability of subjects to suppress interference. The conclusions of this study are as follows: no matter whether the nature of initiating video is positive or negative, under the emotional regulation strategy of expression inhibition or cognitive reassessment, The interference inhibition ability of high psychoelastic substance addicts is significantly stronger than that of low psychoelastic substance addicts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B842.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉金鑫;張水淼;尉壯壯;于波;楊悅;李佳美;鄧光輝;;心理彈性在認(rèn)知情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略和軍人急性應(yīng)激反應(yīng)中的中介作用研究[J];中國全科醫(yī)學(xué);2017年11期

2 趙偉;陳遠(yuǎn)秀;張哲;于志華;;民族院校大學(xué)生心理彈性、情緒調(diào)節(jié)及其社會適應(yīng)性的關(guān)系研究[J];法制與社會;2017年07期

3 陳江婷;林梓龍;黃華;;農(nóng)村教師工作壓力與應(yīng)對方式的關(guān)系:心理彈性的中介作用[J];肇慶學(xué)院學(xué)報;2017年01期

4 楊青;羅潔如;;外來工孤獨感與認(rèn)知情緒調(diào)節(jié)方式的關(guān)系[J];心理技術(shù)與應(yīng)用;2017年01期

5 劉旭;劉志軍;岳鵬飛;;情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略對農(nóng)村中小學(xué)教師壓力困擾的影響:心理資本的中介作用[J];心理研究;2016年06期

6 夏靜靜;劉百里;邢強;;高中生心理彈性、情緒調(diào)節(jié)自我效能感與主觀幸福感的關(guān)系——以廣州市某中學(xué)為例[J];教育測量與評價;2016年11期

7 安獻(xiàn)麗;陳四光;;認(rèn)知重評阻斷條件化恐懼記憶的習(xí)得與表達(dá)——對恐懼反應(yīng)的長程抑制作用[J];心理學(xué)報;2016年10期

8 王春梅;呂勇;;情緒的動機性對注意控制的影響[J];心理學(xué)探新;2016年04期

9 劉芳;丁錦紅;張欽;;高、低趨近積極情緒對不同注意加工階段的影響[J];心理學(xué)報;2016年07期

10 袁孝s，

本文編號：2467829