【摘要】：程序公正是影響合作行為的重要因素,這一效應(yīng)也存在于事件的第三方視角,即程序不公正對(duì)待,會(huì)降低與事件無(wú)直接關(guān)聯(lián)的第三方(旁觀者,如同事等)的合作行為。然而,程序公正如何影響第三方的合作行為,已有研究?jī)H揭示了非工具性因素的中介作用,而忽視了工具性因素在其中的影響;同時(shí),程序不公正事件時(shí)有發(fā)生,組織中的權(quán)威最常見的應(yīng)對(duì)措施是懲罰違背者,而少有研究關(guān)注在程序不公正發(fā)生后,權(quán)威懲罰對(duì)第三方合作行為的作用及其機(jī)制。為了討論程序公正與第三方合作行為之間的工具性因素的中介作用,以及探討在程序不公正背景下,權(quán)威懲罰對(duì)第三方合作行為的積極作用,本文結(jié)合公平啟發(fā)理論和不確定管理理論,探討了不確定感這一工具性動(dòng)機(jī)在程序公正與第三方合作行為之間的中介作用(研究一),并在此基礎(chǔ)上,探討了權(quán)威實(shí)施的懲罰結(jié)果和表達(dá)的懲罰意愿對(duì)第三方的合作行為的積極作用及其機(jī)制(研究二)。研究一分別通過(guò)情境實(shí)驗(yàn)(實(shí)驗(yàn)1)和行為實(shí)驗(yàn)(實(shí)驗(yàn)2)反復(fù)驗(yàn)證了不確定感在程序公正與第三方合作行為之間的中介作用。采用單因素實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),自變量為程序公正(公正vs.不公正),因變量為不確定感和合作行為。結(jié)果表明,程序公正能顯著預(yù)測(cè)第三方的不確定感和合作行為,不確定感中介了程序公正對(duì)第三方合作行為的影響。研究二在研究一的基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)情境實(shí)驗(yàn)(實(shí)驗(yàn)3)和行為實(shí)驗(yàn)(實(shí)驗(yàn)4)探討了權(quán)威實(shí)施的懲罰結(jié)果和表達(dá)的懲罰意愿對(duì)第三方合作行為的積極作用,以及不確定感的中介作用。采用2(懲罰結(jié)果:有vs.無(wú))X2(懲罰意愿:有vs.無(wú))的隨機(jī)實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),因變量為不確定感和合作行為。結(jié)果表明,權(quán)威實(shí)施的懲罰結(jié)果和懲罰意愿能交互影響第三方的不確定感和合作行為,即當(dāng)沒(méi)有懲罰結(jié)果時(shí),懲罰意愿能有效地降低第三方的不確定感,提高合作行為;不確定感中介了懲罰結(jié)果和懲罰意愿對(duì)第三方合作行為的影響。最后,本文對(duì)當(dāng)前研究的理論意義和實(shí)踐意義進(jìn)行了探討,并對(duì)當(dāng)前研究的局限與未來(lái)研究方向進(jìn)行了分析。
[Abstract]:Procedural justice is an important factor affecting cooperative behavior, and this effect also exists in the third-party perspective of the event, that is, procedural injustice will reduce the cooperative behavior of third parties (such as bystanders, colleagues, etc.) that have no direct relationship with the event. However, how procedural justice affects the cooperative behavior of third parties, previous studies have only revealed the intermediary role of non-instrumental factors, but ignored the instrumental factors in which the impact; At the same time, procedural injustices occur from time to time, and the most common countermeasures of authority in organizations are to punish violators, but little attention has been paid to the role and mechanism of authoritative punishment on third-party cooperative behavior after procedural injustices have occurred. In order to discuss the mediating role of instrumental factors between procedural justice and third-party cooperative behavior, and to explore the positive effect of authoritative punishment on third-party cooperative behavior in the context of procedural injustice, Combining the theory of fair inspiration and the theory of uncertain management, this paper discusses the intermediary function of the instrumental motivation of uncertainty between procedural justice and third-party cooperative behavior (study 1), and on the basis of this, this paper discusses the role of uncertainty as an instrumental motivation between procedural justice and third-party cooperative behavior (study 1). This paper discusses the positive effect and mechanism of the punishment results and expressed willingness to punish the third party on the cooperative behavior of the third party (study 2). In the first study, the mediation of uncertainty between procedural justice and third-party cooperative behavior was repeatedly verified by situational experiment (experiment 1) and behavioral experiment (experiment 2). Using single factor experiment design, the independent variable is the program justice (just vs.). (injustice), dependent variables are uncertainty and cooperative behavior. The results show that procedural justice can significantly predict the sense of uncertainty and cooperative behavior of the third party, and the uncertainty mediates the influence of procedural justice on the cooperative behavior of the third party. On the basis of study one, the second study explores the positive effects of authoritative punishment results and expressed willingness to punish on third-party cooperative behavior through situational experiment (experiment 3) and behavior experiment (experiment 4). And the mediating effect of uncertainty. Use 2 (penalty result: with vs. None) X2 (willingness to punish: with vs. Random experiment design, dependent variables are uncertainty and cooperative behavior. The result shows that the punishment result and the punishment intention can affect the uncertainty and cooperation behavior of the third party interactively, that is, when there is no punishment result, the punishment will can effectively reduce the uncertainty of the third party and improve the cooperation behavior. Uncertainty mediates the impact of penalty outcomes and willingness to punish on third-party cooperation. Finally, this paper discusses the theoretical and practical significance of the current research, and analyzes the limitations of the current research and the future research direction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B848

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 朱蘇麗;龍立榮;賀偉;王忠軍;;超越工具性交換:中國(guó)企業(yè)員工—組織類親情交換關(guān)系的理論建構(gòu)與實(shí)證研究[J];管理世界;2015年11期

2 付美云;馬華維;樂(lè)國(guó)安;;職場(chǎng)欺負(fù)的旁觀者:角色、行為與影響機(jī)制[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2014年06期

3 張書維;王二平;周潔;;跨情境下集群行為的動(dòng)因機(jī)制[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

4 王燕;龍立榮;周浩;祖?zhèn)?;分配不公正下的退縮行為:程序公正和互動(dòng)公正的影響[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

5 劉亞,龍立榮,李曄;組織公平感對(duì)組織效果變量的影響[J];管理世界;2003年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2461571