【摘要】：早期對情緒的研究大都以效價為依據(jù)將情緒分為積極情緒和消極情緒。近年來對趨近動機情緒理論等具體情緒理論研究的興起,拓展了情緒研究的范圍,豐富了情緒與決策之間的研究。盡管如此,對于情緒對危機決策的作用方面的研究較多從理論方向加以論證,更鮮有研究者在具體情緒方面進行實證研究。 本研究借鑒前人對危機決策質(zhì)量的測量指標(biāo)的定義,對不同趨近動機的積極情緒下個體面對緊急的突發(fā)事件做出的決策質(zhì)量是否有差異進行了探索性的研究。實驗一是單因素被試間實驗設(shè)計,誘發(fā)被試渴望情緒、平靜情緒以及中性條件后,要求被試完成危機決策任務(wù)材料；實驗二中加入解釋責(zé)任變量,作為一種社會情境對個體的決策起著重要的作用的因素,考查其對危機決策質(zhì)量的影響,采用3(情緒：渴望、平靜、中性條件)x2(解釋責(zé)任：有、無)的被試間實驗設(shè)計,要求被試完成危機決策的任務(wù)材料。實驗一和實驗二的結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)：(1)平靜情緒使得個體在危機情境下所做決策的時間短于渴望情緒下和中性條件下的個體；有解釋責(zé)任使得個體做決策所用的時間比沒有解釋責(zé)任要高。(2)平靜情緒下個體對自己所做的危機決策的自信度和滿意度都比渴望情緒和中性條件下個體的要高。(3)有解釋責(zé)任時,平靜情緒下個體受解釋責(zé)任的影響最小；無解釋責(zé)任時,情緒對個體自身自信度、滿意度的影響顯著,而有解釋責(zé)任下情緒對個體自身自信度及滿意度的影響不顯著。(4)平靜情緒下個體所做危機決策的質(zhì)量最好,解釋責(zé)任減弱了情緒對危機決策質(zhì)量的影響。
[Abstract]:Most of the early studies on emotion classified emotion into positive emotion and negative emotion on the basis of potency. In recent years, the rise of specific emotional theories, such as the theory of approaching motivation and emotion, has expanded the scope of emotional research and enriched the study of the relationship between emotion and decision-making. In spite of this, the research on the role of emotion in crisis decision-making is mostly proved from the theoretical direction, and few researchers do empirical research on the specific emotion. Based on the previous definition of the quality of crisis decision-making, this study explores whether there is a difference in the decision-making quality of individuals in the face of emergency emergencies under the positive emotions of different approaching motivations, which is based on the definition of the quality of decision-making of crisis decision-making. The first experiment was designed to induce desire, calm and neutral conditions, and then the participants were asked to complete the crisis decision-making task materials. In experiment 2, the explanatory responsibility variable was added as an important factor of social situation to individual decision-making, and the influence of it on the quality of decision-making in crisis was examined, using 3 (emotion: desire, calm, and so on). Neutral condition) x2 (interpretive responsibility: yes, none) inter-test design requires participants to complete the task material for crisis decision-making. The results of experiment 1 and experiment 2 show that: (1) calm emotion makes the decision-making time shorter in crisis situation than in desire mood and neutral condition; The responsibility to explain causes individuals to spend more time making decisions than they do not. (2) the confidence and satisfaction of individuals in calmness with the crisis decisions they make are higher than those in desire and neutral conditions. To be high. (3) when there is a duty to explain, Under the calm mood, the individual is the least affected by the responsibility of explanation; The influence of emotion on self-confidence and satisfaction is significant when there is no explanation responsibility. (4) the quality of crisis decision-making under calm mood is the best, but the influence of emotion on self-confidence and satisfaction is not significant under the responsibility of explanation. (4) the quality of crisis decision-making is the best under calm emotion. The responsibility to explain weakens the emotional impact on the quality of crisis decision-making.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧夏大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B842.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭瑞鵬,孔昭君;危機決策的特點、方法及對策研究[J];科技管理研究;2005年08期

2 王永;王振宏;;積極情緒及其在心理治療中的應(yīng)用[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年02期

3 金楊華;情緒對個體判斷和決策影響研究概述[J];心理科學(xué);2004年03期

4 楊繼平;鄭建君;;情緒對危機決策質(zhì)量的影響[J];心理學(xué)報;2009年06期

5 張玲;心理因素如何影響風(fēng)險決策中的價值運算?——兼談Kahneman的貢獻[J];心理科學(xué)進展;2003年03期

6 莊錦英;情緒與決策的關(guān)系[J];心理科學(xué)進展;2003年04期

7 朱莉琪,皇甫剛;不確定情境中的決策心理——適應(yīng)與認(rèn)知[J];心理科學(xué)進展;2003年05期

8 郭小艷;王振宏;;積極情緒的概念、功能與意義[J];心理科學(xué)進展;2007年05期

9 鄒吉林;張小聰;張環(huán);于靚;周仁來;;超越效價和喚醒——情緒的動機維度模型述評[J];心理科學(xué)進展;2011年09期

10 蔣軍;陳雪飛;陳安濤;;情緒誘發(fā)方法及其新進展[J];西南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2011年01期

，

本文編號：2434828