認(rèn)知無意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)與情感無意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)的差異研究
[Abstract]:According to the unconscious thinking theory proposed by Dijksterhuis, the quality of individual decision-making and the mode of thinking of (unconscious thought theory), are closely related to the complexity of goal and task. The thinking is divided into conscious thinking and unconscious thinking by focusing on the relevant target tasks. It is found that the decision-making quality of unconscious thinking is superior to that of conscious thinking under complex conditions, that is, the unconscious thinking effect (unconscious thought effect,UTE). Studies have shown that there are many boundary conditions for (moderators). To produce unconscious thinking effects. Therefore, exploring the conditions for the stability of unconscious thinking effect has become one of the key research points. Based on the two-dimensional definition of cognition and emotion in the concept of classical unconscious thinking, and the current situation of the research on unconscious thinking in academic circles, this study hypothesizes: by stripping the two, In order to obtain the new boundary conditions of unconscious thinking effect and promote the development of unconscious thinking theory, this paper explores the differences between the two kinds of unconscious thinking effects (that is, cognition and emotion). Based on the definition of two dimensions of cognition and emotion in the concept of Dijksterhuis's unconscious thinking, this study creates new experimental materials. The "cognitive unconscious thinking effect" is investigated with the material of reasoning and conceptual formation task as the carrier, and the "emotional unconscious thinking effect" with the affective experimental material as the carrier. To clarify the new boundary conditions of cognition and emotion in unconscious thinking effect. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: first, there is no "cognitive unconscious thinking effect" when solving pure cognitive complex problems. That is to say, the scores of cognitive conscious thinking group are better than those of cognitive unconscious thinking group and immediate decision group when solving pure cognitive complex problems. Second, when solving complex problems of pure emotion, there is "emotional unconscious thinking effect". That is, the scores of unconscious thinking group with high emotional arousal were significantly better than those of conscious thinking group, while the scores of unconscious thinking group with low emotional arousal were not significantly different from those of conscious thinking group. Third, when solving situational problems (cognitive and affective interaction), cognitive information has a greater effect on unconscious thinking than affective. Compared with the pure picture material, the unconscious thinking effect only appears in the experiment of the combination of picture and text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:B842
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 張瓊;原獻(xiàn)學(xué);;無意識(shí)思維結(jié)果浮現(xiàn)的時(shí)間目標(biāo)依賴性[J];心理科學(xué);2015年01期
2 陳彬;張瓊;原獻(xiàn)學(xué);;直覺與無意識(shí)思維決策質(zhì)量之比較[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2014年03期
3 夏益;張聰;原獻(xiàn)學(xué);;無意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)研究的困境與出路[J];心理研究;2014年02期
4 劉磊鑫;蔡璇;原獻(xiàn)學(xué);;知識(shí)遷移對(duì)無意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)的作用[J];心理科學(xué);2012年05期
5 劉春雷;王敏;張慶林;;創(chuàng)造性思維的腦機(jī)制[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2009年01期
6 龐捷敏;原獻(xiàn)學(xué);李建升;;無意識(shí)研究新進(jìn)展:無意識(shí)思維理論述評(píng)[J];心理學(xué)探新;2007年04期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 李建升;無意識(shí)思維整體加工方式的研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2014年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 張斌;消費(fèi)者品牌印象形成中的無意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2014年
2 劉磊鑫;無意識(shí)思維動(dòng)機(jī)對(duì)無意識(shí)思維效應(yīng)的作用[D];寧波大學(xué);2013年
,本文編號(hào):2416192
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2416192.html