自我提問訓(xùn)練對(duì)小學(xué)生閱讀理解監(jiān)控的影響
[Abstract]:Since the concept of metacognition was put forward, researchers have made a lot of theoretical and empirical research on metacognition. And educational theorists systematically discuss the relationship between metacognition and self-regulated learning. They think that metacognition is a part of self-regulated learning and plays an active role in self-regulated learning. As one of the main sources of knowledge acquisition, reading activity is also an important part of self-regulated learning. In order to successfully complete the reading task, readers can not do without the monitoring process of metacognition. The metacognitive activities in reading comprehension learning are called reading comprehension monitoring. Reading comprehension monitoring includes two processes: monitoring process and controlling process. In view of the important role of reading comprehension monitoring in reading achievement, we can improve the level of metacognitive monitoring in reading comprehension learning through intervention training. At present, there are many researches on the process of reading comprehension monitoring. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to use the experimental method to use the accuracy of achievement prediction as the index of reading comprehension monitoring level, and the task selection suitability as the index of reading comprehension control level. In order to explore the effect of self-questioning training on pupils' questioning level, reading comprehension monitoring level and reading achievement, the students in a primary school in Yanji city were intervened by self-questioning training. The results are as follows: (1) Self-questioning training significantly increased the number of pupils' questions in reading comprehension learning. (2) Self-questioning training significantly improved the accuracy of performance prediction and task selection of pupils. (3) self-questioning training significantly improved the reading comprehension of primary school students.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:B842.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 任潔;李偉健;謝瑞波;李平;陳海德;;項(xiàng)目分值對(duì)學(xué)習(xí)時(shí)間分配的影響:一種動(dòng)態(tài)的過程[J];心理科學(xué);2014年04期
2 魏飛;劉儒德;何伊麗;劉林澍;魏軍;;難度與分值對(duì)高一學(xué)生選擇停止、集中或分散學(xué)習(xí)的影響[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2013年03期
3 姜英杰;嚴(yán)燕;;4~6歲兒童元記憶監(jiān)測(cè)判斷的發(fā)展[J];心理科學(xué);2013年02期
4 劉輝;;超文本閱讀的模式與效果——一項(xiàng)基于元認(rèn)知的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];西南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年02期
5 賈寧;代景華;;小學(xué)高年級(jí)學(xué)生的學(xué)習(xí)判斷絕對(duì)準(zhǔn)確性及預(yù)見偏差[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2012年01期
6 盧紅;王黎;;閱讀理解監(jiān)控研究進(jìn)展[J];心理研究;2010年04期
7 陳啟山;溫忠麟;;元認(rèn)知與有效學(xué)習(xí):原理與條件[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2010年01期
8 陳啟山;;閱讀中的元理解監(jiān)測(cè)與元理解調(diào)控[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2009年08期
9 黎堅(jiān);袁文東;駱方;杜衛(wèi);;心理負(fù)荷對(duì)元記憶監(jiān)測(cè)準(zhǔn)確性及偏差的影響[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2009年03期
10 李梅;丁艷云;;FOK(知曉感)的研究現(xiàn)狀及未來趨勢(shì)[J];吉林省教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條
1 孫景華;3-5年級(jí)小學(xué)生語文閱讀元認(rèn)知的特點(diǎn)及干預(yù)[D];河南大學(xué);2012年
2 崔倩倩;元認(rèn)知監(jiān)控與注意轉(zhuǎn)換的關(guān)系[D];杭州師范大學(xué);2011年
3 譚月輝;農(nóng)村初中化學(xué)教學(xué)中學(xué)生問題意識(shí)的培養(yǎng)研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2011年
4 曾旭麗;摘要和自我提問對(duì)元理解準(zhǔn)確性的影響[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2009年
5 史蘇敏;閱讀背景下高職生自我提問能力培養(yǎng)的研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年
6 孫鳳娟;元認(rèn)知監(jiān)控與自主學(xué)習(xí)[D];山東師范大學(xué);2006年
7 楊琳;不同提問類型的初中生問題意識(shí)和學(xué)習(xí)策略的研究[D];天津師范大學(xué);2005年
8 楊小洋;中學(xué)生提問能力發(fā)展及與其閱讀理解能力關(guān)系的研究[D];北京師范大學(xué);2003年
,本文編號(hào):2413515
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2413515.html