風險信息類型、時間和情緒對環(huán)境風險認知的影響
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-10 22:41
【摘要】：德國慕尼黑大學哲學家烏爾里�！へ惪私淌谠谒臅惺状翁岢隽恕帮L險社會”的概念，他在書中鄭重地告誡:我們已經(jīng)進入了一個“風險社會”!近年來中國在經(jīng)濟方面取得了舉世矚目的成就，但在經(jīng)濟蓬勃發(fā)展的背后，是環(huán)境遭到嚴重破壞的慘痛代價，環(huán)境問題在今天的中國是一個熱門的話題，所以對于環(huán)境風險認知的研究就顯得尤為重要。 前人研究得出了結(jié)論：不同的風險信息的傳遞通道和環(huán)境風險信息類型對于環(huán)境風險認知是有影響的，本研究在以往的環(huán)境風險認知的研究成果的基礎(chǔ)之上設計了實驗1，實驗1的目的是研究環(huán)境風險信息類型與時間對于環(huán)境風險認知的影響。實驗1得出了以下結(jié)論：（1）人們對三種不同的環(huán)境風險信息類型（疾病災害、生活環(huán)境和生態(tài)環(huán)境）的風險認知程度由大到小的排列順序依次為：生活環(huán)境、生態(tài)環(huán)境、疾病災害。（2）性別因素對環(huán)境風險認知無影響。（3）人們對時間描述為10年時的環(huán)境風險認知強于時間描述為1年時的環(huán)境風險認知。實驗1中未考慮情緒因素對于環(huán)境風險認知的影響。 已有的研究表明，情緒在風險認知的過程中扮演著重要的角色。存在著兩個平行而且相互作用的信息加工模式，，第一個被描述為“理性的”，而第二個則被描述為“由情感驅(qū)動的與經(jīng)驗有關(guān)的”。情緒啟動理論也表明喚起不同的情緒會影響人們的認知。實驗2基于以上結(jié)論，采用圖片喚起被試的不同情緒，研究在不同的情緒下，環(huán)境風險信息類型與時間對于環(huán)境風險認知的影響。實驗2得出以下結(jié)論：（1）情緒因素對環(huán)境風險認知只在時間描述為1年時有影響。（2）而情緒變量為積極時，情緒因素對環(huán)境風險認知沒有影響。（3）只有在情緒變量為消極時，情緒因素才對環(huán)境風險認知有顯著影響。（4）實驗2的結(jié)果得出人們對三類不同環(huán)境風險信息類型（疾病災害、生活環(huán)境、生態(tài)環(huán)境）的環(huán)境風險認知程度的排序與實驗1相同，是對實驗1結(jié)果的重復驗證。 本研究兩個實驗采用同樣的實驗范式，雖然在實驗內(nèi)容上有部分重疊，但是兩次實驗的結(jié)果互相驗證，提高了三種環(huán)境風險信息類型的風險認知程度排序的可信度。但由于實驗材料和實驗設計等因素的限制，外部效度較低。在以后的實驗研究中，可以對以上的不足有針對地改進，以使實驗結(jié)果更加完全、信效度更高。
[Abstract]:In his book, Professor Ulrich Baker, philosopher of the University of Munich, first put forward the concept of "risk society", in which he solemnly warned: we have entered a "risk society"! In recent years, China has made remarkable achievements in the field of economy, but behind the booming economy is the heavy cost of serious environmental damage. The environmental problem is a hot topic in China today. Therefore, the study of environmental risk cognition is particularly important. Previous studies have concluded that different risk information transmission channels and environmental risk information types have an impact on environmental risk cognition. The purpose of experiment 1 is to study the effect of environmental risk information type and time on environmental risk cognition. The conclusions of experiment 1 are as follows: (1) the order of risk cognition of three different types of environmental risk information (disease disaster, living environment and ecological environment) is as follows: living environment, ecological environment. (2) gender factors had no effect on environmental risk cognition. (3) people's cognition of environmental risk when time was described as 10 years was stronger than that when time was described as one year. In experiment 1, the influence of emotional factors on environmental risk cognition was not considered. Previous studies have shown that emotion plays an important role in risk cognition. There are two parallel and interactive information processing models, the first being described as "rational" and the second as "affective driven by experience". Emotional priming theory also shows that arousing different emotions can affect people's cognition. Based on the above conclusions, experiment 2 uses pictures to arouse different emotions of the subjects, and studies the effects of environmental risk information type and time on environmental risk cognition under different emotions. In experiment 2, the following conclusions were drawn: (1) emotional factors had an effect on environmental risk perception only when time was described as 1 year, and (2) when emotional variables were positive, Emotional factors have no effect on environmental risk cognition. (3) only when emotional variables are negative, (4) the results of experiment 2 showed that there were three different types of environmental risk information (disease and disaster, living environment). The order of environmental risk cognition of Eco-environment is the same as that of experiment 1, which is the repeated verification of the results of experiment 1. The two experiments adopt the same experimental paradigm. Although there are some overlaps in the contents of the experiments, the results of the two experiments verify each other, which improves the reliability of the ranking of the risk cognition of the three types of environmental risk information. However, due to the limitation of experimental materials and experimental design, the external validity is low. In order to make the experimental results more complete, the reliability and validity can be improved.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B842
[Abstract]:In his book, Professor Ulrich Baker, philosopher of the University of Munich, first put forward the concept of "risk society", in which he solemnly warned: we have entered a "risk society"! In recent years, China has made remarkable achievements in the field of economy, but behind the booming economy is the heavy cost of serious environmental damage. The environmental problem is a hot topic in China today. Therefore, the study of environmental risk cognition is particularly important. Previous studies have concluded that different risk information transmission channels and environmental risk information types have an impact on environmental risk cognition. The purpose of experiment 1 is to study the effect of environmental risk information type and time on environmental risk cognition. The conclusions of experiment 1 are as follows: (1) the order of risk cognition of three different types of environmental risk information (disease disaster, living environment and ecological environment) is as follows: living environment, ecological environment. (2) gender factors had no effect on environmental risk cognition. (3) people's cognition of environmental risk when time was described as 10 years was stronger than that when time was described as one year. In experiment 1, the influence of emotional factors on environmental risk cognition was not considered. Previous studies have shown that emotion plays an important role in risk cognition. There are two parallel and interactive information processing models, the first being described as "rational" and the second as "affective driven by experience". Emotional priming theory also shows that arousing different emotions can affect people's cognition. Based on the above conclusions, experiment 2 uses pictures to arouse different emotions of the subjects, and studies the effects of environmental risk information type and time on environmental risk cognition under different emotions. In experiment 2, the following conclusions were drawn: (1) emotional factors had an effect on environmental risk perception only when time was described as 1 year, and (2) when emotional variables were positive, Emotional factors have no effect on environmental risk cognition. (3) only when emotional variables are negative, (4) the results of experiment 2 showed that there were three different types of environmental risk information (disease and disaster, living environment). The order of environmental risk cognition of Eco-environment is the same as that of experiment 1, which is the repeated verification of the results of experiment 1. The two experiments adopt the same experimental paradigm. Although there are some overlaps in the contents of the experiments, the results of the two experiments verify each other, which improves the reliability of the ranking of the risk cognition of the three types of environmental risk information. However, due to the limitation of experimental materials and experimental design, the external validity is low. In order to make the experimental results more complete, the reliability and validity can be improved.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B842
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 夏玉珍;吳婭丹;;中國正進入風險社會時代[J];甘肅社會科學;2007年01期
2 鐘政林,曾光明,楊春平;環(huán)境風險評價研究進展[J];環(huán)境科學進展;1996年06期
3 王政;;國內(nèi)風險認知研究文獻綜述[J];濟寧學院學報;2011年05期
4 強月新;余建清;;風險溝通:研究譜系與模型重構(gòu)[J];武漢大學學報(人文科學版);2008年04期
5 林愛s
本文編號：2323768
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2323768.html
教材專著
