【摘要】：近幾年來,道德評(píng)價(jià)在內(nèi)群體評(píng)價(jià)中的重要性逐漸受到研究者的關(guān)注,本研究通過系列研究驗(yàn)證在中國(guó)社會(huì)下道德評(píng)價(jià)是否作為最重要的內(nèi)群體積極評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo),以及在自然狀態(tài)和發(fā)生內(nèi)外群體比較的情況下,個(gè)體對(duì)內(nèi)群體在道德、能力和社會(huì)性的評(píng)價(jià)上存在的特點(diǎn)： 研究一和研究二采用問卷調(diào)查的研究方法對(duì)研究假設(shè)進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證,兩個(gè)研究的方差分析結(jié)果均顯示個(gè)體對(duì)道德的重視程度顯著高于能力和社會(huì)性。但是研究二的驗(yàn)證性因素分析的結(jié)果顯示,觀測(cè)數(shù)據(jù)與假設(shè)的三因子模型的擬合度并不理想,和調(diào)整后的三因子模型擬合度更優(yōu),這可能是由于在中國(guó)的社會(huì)環(huán)境下,用于測(cè)量社會(huì)性的一些特質(zhì)描述詞有道德的含義。 研究三和研究四采用實(shí)驗(yàn)研究的方法,通過向被試提供一份虛構(gòu)的調(diào)查報(bào)告,操縱不同的變量來創(chuàng)造不同的實(shí)驗(yàn)條件,觀察在不同的實(shí)驗(yàn)條件下,被試對(duì)內(nèi)群體在道德、能力和社會(huì)性的評(píng)價(jià)上的變化。研究三的結(jié)果顯示道德在個(gè)體對(duì)內(nèi)群體評(píng)價(jià)時(shí)最為重要,而在對(duì)外群體評(píng)價(jià)時(shí)并不重要。研究四的結(jié)果顯示只有道德變量能影響群體認(rèn)同水平和群體羞恥感,但是認(rèn)同可以同時(shí)影響個(gè)體對(duì)群體的能力評(píng)價(jià)和道德評(píng)價(jià)。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the importance of moral evaluation has been paid more and more attention by researchers. Through a series of studies, this study verifies whether moral evaluation is the most important index of positive evaluation of internal groups in Chinese society. And in the case of a natural state and a comparison of internal and external groups, the individual is morally committed to the internal group, The characteristics of ability and sociality evaluation: the first and second studies used questionnaire to verify the hypothesis of the research. The ANOVA results of both studies show that individuals attach more importance to morality than ability and sociality. However, the results of confirmatory factor analysis in study 2 show that the fitting degree between the observed data and the hypothetical three-factor model is not ideal, and that the adjusted three-factor model is better, which may be due to the social environment in China. Some idiosyncratic descriptive words used to measure sociality have moral implications. In the third and fourth studies, by providing a fictitious investigation report to the subjects and manipulating different variables to create different experimental conditions, we observed that under different experimental conditions, the subjects' inner groups were in morality. Changes in the evaluation of competence and sociality. The results of the third study show that morality is most important in the evaluation of the internal group, but not in the evaluation of the external group. The results of the fourth study show that only the moral variables can affect the level of group identity and the sense of shame, but identity can also affect the ability of individuals to evaluate the group and moral evaluation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B849

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 管健;;刻板印象從內(nèi)容模型到系統(tǒng)模型的發(fā)展與應(yīng)用[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2009年04期

2 石晶;郝振;崔麗娟;;群體認(rèn)同對(duì)極端群體行為的影響:中介及調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)的檢驗(yàn)[J];心理科學(xué);2012年02期

3 丁道群;張湘一;;情緒作為道德判斷的“催化劑”:道德判斷中的評(píng)價(jià)傾向與特異性效應(yīng)[J];心理學(xué)探新;2013年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2317042