【摘要】：目的:探討高惡意創(chuàng)造力者的注意偏向和沖動(dòng)控制特征。方法:采用自編惡意創(chuàng)造力測(cè)驗(yàn)測(cè)量惡意創(chuàng)造力;情緒Stroop測(cè)驗(yàn)測(cè)量攻擊性詞匯的注意偏向;BIS-11測(cè)量沖動(dòng)控制特征。在此基礎(chǔ)上探討變量之間相關(guān)關(guān)系和高、低惡意創(chuàng)造力者的組間差異。結(jié)果:(1)高惡意創(chuàng)造力者比低惡意創(chuàng)造力者在攻擊詞注意偏向上得分更高;(2)惡意創(chuàng)造力與無(wú)計(jì)劃沖動(dòng)性維度呈顯著負(fù)相關(guān);(3)高惡意創(chuàng)造力者比低惡意創(chuàng)造力在無(wú)計(jì)劃沖動(dòng)性維度上得分更低。結(jié)論:(1)高惡意創(chuàng)造力者比低惡意創(chuàng)造力者存在更顯著的攻擊性注意偏向;(2)高惡意創(chuàng)造力者比低惡意創(chuàng)造力者在抑制沖動(dòng)上存在優(yōu)勢(shì)。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the characteristics of attention bias and impulse control in highly malicious creative people. Methods: malevolent creativity was measured by self-designed malicious creativity test, attention bias of aggressive vocabulary was measured by emotional Stroop test, and impulsive control characteristics were measured by BIS-11. On this basis, the correlation between variables and the differences between high and low malicious creativity groups were discussed. Results: (1) the score of aggressive word attention bias was higher in the highly malicious creativity group than in the low malicious creativity group, and (2) there was a significant negative correlation between the malicious creativity and the unplanned impulsiveness dimension. (3) the score of high malicious creativity was lower than that of low malicious creativity in unplanned impulsive dimension. Conclusion: (1) the highly malicious creative person has more aggressive attention bias than the low-malicious creative person, and (2) the high-malicious creative person has the advantage in inhibiting the impulse than the low-malicious creative person.
【作者單位】： 南京師范大學(xué)心理學(xué)院暨認(rèn)知神經(jīng)科學(xué)實(shí)驗(yàn)室;
【基金】：江蘇省第四期“333高層次人才培養(yǎng)工程”科研項(xiàng)目 江蘇省普通高校研究生科研創(chuàng)新計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(KYZZ16_0439) 2016年優(yōu)秀博士學(xué)位論文培育計(jì)劃(YBPY16_007)
【分類號(hào)】：B842.3
，

本文編號(hào)：2316748