【摘要】：近年來，研究者越來越重視情境因素對個(gè)體道德行為的影響。以往研究證明了光亮、溫度、氣味等物理環(huán)境因素會(huì)影響到個(gè)體的道德行為，此外，，個(gè)體是否疲憊、自身是否清潔、體態(tài)姿勢等自身因素也會(huì)影響到個(gè)體的道德行為。作為外界因素之一的人際因素對自我道德行為的影響，已有研究僅僅從群體行為影響個(gè)體行為的角度做出了一些解釋，但單個(gè)他人的道德行為對自我行為有什么影響，以往的研究尚且沒有考慮到這一點(diǎn)。道德推脫是指個(gè)體做出違背內(nèi)心道德準(zhǔn)則的行為后為了維護(hù)良好的自我形象，使道德自我調(diào)節(jié)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)失效的機(jī)制；道德推脫也是影響個(gè)體道德行為的重要因素。親密的人際關(guān)系能夠模糊自我和他人的界限，進(jìn)而合理化他人的行為，因此，本研究探討與自我人際親密度不同的單個(gè)他人道德行為對自我行為的影響，同時(shí)結(jié)合道德推脫，探討人際親密度影響自我道德行為的原因。 整個(gè)研究由三部分組成：研究一探討人際親密度為對自我不道德行為和道德判斷的影響及其原因，研究二探討人際親密度對自我道德行為和道德判斷的影響及其原因，研究三比較了人際親密度和道德情境對自我道德行為影響的差異，以及人際親密度和道德情境對道德判斷的影響差異。研究主要獲得如下結(jié)論： (1)相對于關(guān)系一般和疏遠(yuǎn)的人，與個(gè)體關(guān)系親密的人做出不道德行為對自我行為的影響更大；同時(shí)，個(gè)體對親密他人不道德行為的評價(jià)更加道德，道德推脫在人際親密度和自我行為間，以及人際親密度和道德判斷間均起到部分中介作用。 (2)相對于關(guān)系一般和疏遠(yuǎn)的人，與個(gè)體關(guān)系親密的人做出道德行為對個(gè)體行為的影響更大；但是個(gè)體對該道德行為的判斷并不因人際親密度不同而存在差異。 (3)與自我關(guān)系親密的人做出道德行為比做出不道德行為對自我行為的影響更大；不論人際親密度如何，相對于做出不道德行為，他人做出道德行為對道德判斷的影響更大。
[Abstract]:In recent years, researchers pay more and more attention to the influence of situational factors on individual moral behavior. Previous studies have proved that physical environmental factors such as light, temperature, smell and other physical factors will affect the moral behavior of individuals, in addition, whether the individual is tired, clean or not, posture and other factors will also affect the moral behavior of the individual. As one of the external factors, the influence of interpersonal factors on self-moral behavior has been explained only from the perspective of group behavior affecting individual behavior, but what effect does the moral behavior of individual others have on self-behavior? Previous studies have not taken this into account. Moral deduction is the mechanism that makes moral self-regulation standard invalid in order to maintain a good self-image after the individual makes the behavior against the inner moral standard. Moral deduction is also an important factor that affects the individual moral behavior. Intimate interpersonal relationships can blur the boundaries between self and others, and then rationalize the behavior of others. Therefore, this study explores the influence of individual moral behavior on self-behavior, which is different from self-interpersonal affinity, and combines with moral deduction. To explore the reasons why interpersonal intimacy affects self-moral behavior. The whole study consists of three parts: one is to explore the influence of interpersonal intimacy on self-immoral behavior and moral judgment and the reasons for it, and the other is to explore the influence of interpersonal affinity on self-moral behavior and moral judgment. The third study compared the difference between interpersonal affinity and moral situation on self-moral behavior, as well as interpersonal cohesion and moral situation on moral judgment. The main conclusions of the study are as follows: (1) the immoral behavior of people who are close to the individual has a greater impact on self-behavior than that of the average and estranged people; at the same time, The individual evaluation of the immoral behavior of intimate others is more moral, moral deduction is between interpersonal intimacy and self-behavior, As well as interpersonal intimacy and moral judgment play a part of the intermediary role. (2) compared with the general and alienated people, the moral behavior of the people who are close to the individual has a greater impact on the individual behavior; However, the individual's judgment on the moral behavior is not different according to the interpersonal affinity. (3) the moral behavior of the person who is close to himself is more important than the immoral behavior. Regardless of interpersonal affinity, other people's moral behavior has a greater impact on moral judgment than unethical behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B848.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 徐驚蟄;謝曉非;;解釋水平視角下的自己-他人決策差異[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

2 牛忠輝;蔣賽;邱俊杰;申之美;張鋒;;社會(huì)距離對他人行為表征的影響:評價(jià)內(nèi)容效價(jià)的作用[J];應(yīng)用心理學(xué);2010年04期

3 王興超;楊繼平;;中文版道德推脫問卷的信效度研究[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2010年02期

4 彭凱平;喻豐;柏陽;;實(shí)驗(yàn)倫理學(xué):研究、貢獻(xiàn)與挑戰(zhàn)[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年06期

本文編號(hào)：2262320