發(fā)布時間：2018-09-09 14:35

【摘要】：目的了解安徽省高校學(xué)報編輯心理健康狀況，并分析其相關(guān)影響因素，為改善高校學(xué)報編輯的身心健康狀況提供科學(xué)依據(jù)。 方法采取整群抽樣，抽取安徽省50所高校92名學(xué)報編輯，采用社會支持量表、職業(yè)倦怠量表和90項癥狀量表（SCL-90）進(jìn)行問卷調(diào)查。采用t檢驗和方差分析，探討高校學(xué)報編輯心理健康現(xiàn)狀及其在不同人口學(xué)變量間的差異；spearman相關(guān)分析，分析高校學(xué)報編輯社會支持、職業(yè)倦怠與心理健康的相關(guān)性；多元逐步回歸分析深入探討社會支持及職業(yè)倦怠各維度對SCL-90中部分陽性因子的預(yù)測作用。 結(jié)果（1）安徽省部分高校學(xué)報編輯SCL-90總分為132.71±25.90，其中軀體化、強迫癥狀、人際關(guān)系敏感、抑郁、焦慮、敵對、恐怖、偏執(zhí)、精神病性各因子評分分別為1.47±0.38、1.71±0.48、1.51±0.42、1.50±0.38、1.43±0.36、1.42±0.37、1.22±0.27、1.49±0.39、1.40±0.27。本次調(diào)查中有16人SCL-90總分≥160分，陽性率17.4%。其中學(xué)報編輯人員存在強迫癥狀問題的人次數(shù)檢出率最高，占30.4％；第二位的是人際關(guān)系敏感問題（17.4％）；第三位的是飲食和睡眠問題（15.2％）及偏執(zhí)問題（15.2％），而恐怖（4.3％）和精神病性（4.3％）問題發(fā)生比例最低。（2）對學(xué)報編輯人員SCL-90總分及各因子均分與全國成人常模進(jìn)行比較，結(jié)果顯示總分與常模比較差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（P＞0.05）。各因子中學(xué)報編輯人員軀體化評分高于常模（P＜0.05），人際關(guān)系敏感評分低于常模（P＜0.01），精神病性評分高于常模（P＜0.01）。在強迫癥狀、抑郁、焦慮、敵對、恐怖、偏執(zhí)等因子上兩組評分差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（P＞0.05）。（3）不同性別對SCL-90總分、人際關(guān)系敏感因子評分、強迫癥狀因子評分、抑郁因子評分、焦慮因子評分、恐怖因子評分的影響差異均有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（P＜0.05～P＜0.01）；不同婚姻狀況對軀體化因子、強迫癥狀因子的影響差異均有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（P＜0.05～P＜0.01）；不同學(xué)歷無論對SCL-90總分上還是各因子評分的影響差異均無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（P＞0.05）；不同職稱對強迫癥狀因子、恐怖因子的影響差異均有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（P＜0.05～P＜0.01）；不同年齡段對軀體化因子評分、其他因子評分（飲食和睡眠）的影響差異均有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（P＜0.05～P＜0.01）；不同從業(yè)時間對敵對因子評分、偏執(zhí)因子評分、精神病性因子評分的影響差異均有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（P＜0.05～P＜0.01）；不同出版周期對焦慮因子評分的影響差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（P＜0.01）。（4）相關(guān)分析顯示：主觀支持與強迫癥狀因子、抑郁因子和焦慮因子均呈負(fù)相關(guān)（P＜0.05）；除偏執(zhí)因子外，客觀支持與SCL-90其余因子均呈負(fù)相關(guān)（P＜0.05～P＜0.01）；支持利用度與SCL-90各因子均呈負(fù)相關(guān)（P＜0.05～P＜0.01）。情緒衰竭與SCL-90各因子均呈顯著正相關(guān)（P＜0.01）；玩世不恭與軀體化因子、強迫癥狀因子、人際關(guān)系敏感因子、抑郁因子、敵對因子均呈正相關(guān)（P＜0.05～P＜0.01）；除偏執(zhí)因子和精神病性因子外，成就感低落與SCL-90其余各因子均呈顯著正相關(guān)（P＜0.01）。主觀支持與職業(yè)倦怠各維度均呈負(fù)相關(guān)（P＜0.05～P＜0.01）；客觀支持與成就感低落呈負(fù)相關(guān)（P＜0.05）；支持利用度與職業(yè)倦怠各維度均呈顯著負(fù)相關(guān)（P＜0.01）。（5）多元回歸分析顯示：情緒衰竭和成就感低落對SCL-90的軀體化因子均有預(yù)測作用，共同解釋了軀體化因子總變異量的27.3%；成就感低落、支持利用度和情緒衰竭對SCL-90的軀體化因子均有預(yù)測作用，共同解釋了軀體化因子總變異量的25.9%；情緒衰竭和支持利用度對SCL-90的精神病性因子均有預(yù)測作用，共同解釋了精神病性因子總變異量的13.2%。 結(jié)論（1）安徽省高校學(xué)報編輯人員心理健康總體水平跟常模相似，但在軀體化和精神病性因子得分上高于常模，在人際關(guān)系敏感因子得分上低于常模。（2）社會人口學(xué)變量中的性別、婚姻狀況、職稱、年齡段、從業(yè)時間、期刊出版周期對SCL-90部分因子產(chǎn)生影響。（3）社會支持越多，心理健康水平越好；職業(yè)倦怠水平越高，心理健康水平越差。社會支持和職業(yè)倦怠各因子都不同程度上影響編輯工作人員的心理健康水平，增加社會支持，，減少職業(yè)倦怠可改善編輯工作人員的心理健康水平。
[Abstract]:Objective To understand the mental health status of University Journal Editors in Anhui Province and analyze the related influencing factors, so as to provide scientific basis for improving the mental and physical health status of University Journal editors.
Methods 92 editors of 50 colleges and universities in Anhui Province were selected by cluster sampling and surveyed with Social Support Scale, Job Burnout Scale and 90 Symptoms Scale (SCL-90). The correlation among social support, job burnout and mental health of university journal editors was analyzed, and the predictive effect of social support and job burnout on some positive factors in SCL-90 was explored by multiple stepwise regression analysis.
Results (1) The total score of SCL-90 in some college journals of Anhui Province was 132.71 (+ 25.90). The scores of somatization, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobia, paranoia and psychotic factors were 1.47 (+ 0.38), 1.71 (+ 0.48), 1.51 (+ 0.42), 1.50 (+ 0.38), 1.43 (+ 0.36), 1.42 (+ 0.37), 1.22 (+ 0.27), 1.49 (+ 0.39), 1.40 (+ 0.27) respectively. The positive rate of SCL-90 was 17.4%. Among them, 30.4% had obsessive-compulsive symptoms, 17.4% had interpersonal sensitivity, 15.2% had dietary and sleep problems, 15.2% had paranoid problems, 4.3% had phobia and 4.3% had psychosis. (2) Comparing the total score of SCL-90 and the average score of each factor with the national adult norm, the results showed that there was no significant difference between the total score and the norm (P > 0.05). The somatization score of the editors of secondary school newspapers was higher than that of the norm (P < 0.05), and the interpersonal sensitivity score was lower than that of the norm (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in obsessive-compulsive symptoms, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobia, paranoia and other factors (P > 0.05). (3) There was no significant difference between the two groups in the total score of SCL-90, interpersonal sensitivity factor score, obsessive-compulsive symptom factor score, depression factor score, anxiety factor score, phobia factor score. There were significant differences between the two groups (P Significant differences were found in the effects of symptom factors and phobia factors (P < 0.05-P < 0.01), somatization factors and other factors (diet and sleep) in different age groups (P < 0.05-P < 0.01), hostility factors, paranoid factors and psychotic factors in different working hours (P < 0.05-P < 0.01). (4) Correlation analysis showed that subjective support was negatively correlated with obsessive-compulsive symptom factor, depression factor and anxiety factor (P < 0.05), and objective support was negatively correlated with SCL except paranoid factor. The other factors of - 90 were negatively correlated (P There was a significant positive correlation between SCL-90 and other factors except paranoia and psychosis (P < 0.05-P < 0.01). Subjective support was negatively correlated with all dimensions of job burnout (P < 0.05-P < 0.01); objective support was negatively correlated with low achievement (P < 0.05); support utilization was negatively correlated with job burnout (P < 0.05). (5) Multivariate regression analysis showed that emotional exhaustion and low sense of achievement both predicted the somatization factors of SCL-90, and together explained 27.3% of the total variation of somatization factors; low sense of achievement, support utilization and emotional exhaustion all predicted the somatization factors of SCL-90. It also explained 25.9% of the total variance of somatization factors and predicted 13.2% of the total variance of psychiatric factors in SCL-90 by emotional exhaustion and support utilization.
Conclusion (1) The general mental health level of the editors of Anhui university journals is similar to that of the norm, but the scores of somatization and psychoticism are higher than that of the norm, and the scores of interpersonal sensitivity are lower than that of the norm. (2) The gender, marital status, professional title, age, working time, and periodical publishing cycle of the social demographic variables affect SCL-90. (3) The more social support, the better the mental health level; the higher the level of job burnout, the worse the mental health level. The factors of social support and job burnout affect the mental health level of editorial staff in varying degrees. Increasing social support and reducing job burnout can improve the mental health of editorial staff. Level of health.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B844

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 俞國良,曾盼盼;論教師心理健康及其促進(jìn)[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2001年01期

2 吳紅艷,李春華,白發(fā)秀;科技期刊編輯的心理健康狀況與個性特征分析[J];編輯學(xué)報;2003年04期

3 于涌,張積賓;科技期刊編輯人員職業(yè)倦怠及其影響因素[J];編輯學(xué)報;2004年06期

4 姬建敏;科技編輯心理健康狀況調(diào)查分析[J];編輯學(xué)報;2005年04期

5 陳銳鋒;;關(guān)注科技期刊編輯的職業(yè)健康——科技期刊編輯職業(yè)危害因素探析[J];編輯學(xué)報;2012年01期

6 邢海濤;陳江;;消除職業(yè)倦怠,促進(jìn)出版發(fā)展[J];中國編輯;2009年06期

7 徐晉華;;談編輯的職業(yè)倦怠與調(diào)適[J];編輯之友;2010年09期

8 李廣宇;;走出倦怠是從容——試論編輯職業(yè)倦怠的現(xiàn)狀、壓力源解析及消解[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2007年03期

9 米加德;;編輯心理健康研究進(jìn)展[J];出版科學(xué);2010年05期

10 袁力;七十三;;內(nèi)蒙古新聞記者心理壓力、社會支持與主觀幸福感調(diào)查與分析[J];大連民族學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年02期

本文編號：2232667