類別歸納中具體與一般結(jié)論任務(wù)的ERP特征比較
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-06 09:17
【摘要】：研究采用事件相關(guān)電位技術(shù)(ERPs),比較了具體結(jié)論類別歸納推理(例如,前提條件:蘋果X1,推論結(jié)論條件:梨子X1?,即梨子是否也具有屬性X1)與一般結(jié)論類別歸納推理(例如,前提條件:蘋果X1,推論結(jié)論條件:水果X1?,即水果是否也具有屬性X1)的ERP特征差異.實驗結(jié)果顯示:與基線條件相比(例如,前提條件:蘋果X1,推論結(jié)論條件:蘋果X1?),具體和一般條件誘發(fā)了更大的P2,反映了具體與一般結(jié)論增加的漢字正字法的表征分析過程;同時具體和一般結(jié)論條件比基線條件誘發(fā)了更大的N2成分,反映了知覺匹配.另外,具體結(jié)論條件比一般結(jié)論條件誘發(fā)了更小的P3b成分,反映了具體結(jié)論條件比一般結(jié)論條件需要更多的工作記憶或有更低水平的推理預(yù)期滿意程度.最后,具體結(jié)論條件比一般結(jié)論條件誘發(fā)了更大的N400成分,表明具體結(jié)論條件比一般結(jié)論條件需要更多的認(rèn)知努力整合信息.這些發(fā)現(xiàn)表明,在類別歸納推理中,具體結(jié)論與一般結(jié)論條件在ERP特征上是存在差異的.
[Abstract]:In this study, event-related potential (ERPs),) technique was used to compare the inductive inference of specific conclusions (for example, apple X 1, inference conclusion condition: pear X1, whether pear also has attribute X1) with general conclusion inductive reasoning (for example, conclusion X1). Precondition: Apple X1, corollary condition: fruit X1, that is, whether the fruit also has the attribute X1, the difference of ERP characteristics. The experimental results showed that compared with the baseline conditions (for example, the precondition: Apple X1, the corollary condition: Apple X1?), the specific and general conditions induced a larger P2s, which reflected the process of characterizing and analyzing the orthography of Chinese characters with the increase of specific and general conclusions. At the same time, the specific and general conditions induce a larger N _ 2 component than baseline conditions, reflecting perceptual matching. In addition, the specific conclusion condition induces a smaller P3b component than the general conclusion condition, which reflects that the concrete conclusion condition requires more working memory than the general conclusion condition or has a lower level of expected satisfaction. Finally, the conclusion condition induces a larger N400 component than the general conclusion condition, which indicates that the concrete conclusion condition requires more cognitive effort to integrate information than the general conclusion condition. These findings indicate that there are differences in ERP characteristics between specific conclusions and general conclusion conditions in category inductive reasoning.
【作者單位】： 重慶市教育評估院;西南大學(xué)心理學(xué)部;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項目(31200780)
【分類號】：B842
，
本文編號：2225889
[Abstract]:In this study, event-related potential (ERPs),) technique was used to compare the inductive inference of specific conclusions (for example, apple X 1, inference conclusion condition: pear X1, whether pear also has attribute X1) with general conclusion inductive reasoning (for example, conclusion X1). Precondition: Apple X1, corollary condition: fruit X1, that is, whether the fruit also has the attribute X1, the difference of ERP characteristics. The experimental results showed that compared with the baseline conditions (for example, the precondition: Apple X1, the corollary condition: Apple X1?), the specific and general conditions induced a larger P2s, which reflected the process of characterizing and analyzing the orthography of Chinese characters with the increase of specific and general conclusions. At the same time, the specific and general conditions induce a larger N _ 2 component than baseline conditions, reflecting perceptual matching. In addition, the specific conclusion condition induces a smaller P3b component than the general conclusion condition, which reflects that the concrete conclusion condition requires more working memory than the general conclusion condition or has a lower level of expected satisfaction. Finally, the conclusion condition induces a larger N400 component than the general conclusion condition, which indicates that the concrete conclusion condition requires more cognitive effort to integrate information than the general conclusion condition. These findings indicate that there are differences in ERP characteristics between specific conclusions and general conclusion conditions in category inductive reasoning.
【作者單位】： 重慶市教育評估院;西南大學(xué)心理學(xué)部;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項目(31200780)
【分類號】：B842
，
本文編號：2225889
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2225889.html
最近更新
教材專著
