【摘要】：共情這個術(shù)語,自它出現(xiàn)在文獻中時就展現(xiàn)出了多種意義。比較統(tǒng)一的定義是,換位思考他人的想法、感受和行為的能力。由此引申出的疼痛共情,被認為是由于旁人遭受疼痛,而引發(fā)的感知、體驗和情緒反應(yīng),即對他人疼痛的感同身受。無論是對個體的生存發(fā)展還是人際交往,疼痛共情都有著不可或缺的積極作用。影響疼痛共情的因素很多,其中人格因素是一種重要因素,但是人格與疼痛共情的關(guān)系還有待深入探索。本研究選擇自立人格中的一種重要特質(zhì)——人際責(zé)任來探索人格與共情的關(guān)系。人際責(zé)任是指對人忠、信,是一種體現(xiàn)中國文化特點的人際特質(zhì)。本研究假設(shè),人際責(zé)任與疼痛共情有關(guān),而且這種關(guān)系受到情境因素的影響。具體表現(xiàn)為:在自我卷入度高的生動形象的傷害想象情境中,人際責(zé)任與疼痛共情的相關(guān)更高;在自我卷入度相對較低的情境中,人際責(zé)任分數(shù)與疼痛共情相關(guān)較低甚至可能不相關(guān)。實驗一讓被試觀察他人身體部位疼痛圖片并對其疼痛程度進行評定,并且在觀察過程中對自己說:“他/她受到的傷害是我導(dǎo)致的”,同時生動形象地想象導(dǎo)致該人受到圖片中所呈現(xiàn)的傷害的具體情境,以此探討在傷害想象情境中人際責(zé)任與疼痛共情的關(guān)系。共113名被試,其中,85名女生,28名男生。先請被試填寫一份大學(xué)生人際自立量表(ISSS-US),然后觀察圖片并評定圖片中人物的疼痛程度。實驗操作分別為:操作組(無傷害想象情境)、實驗組(傷害想象情境)。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)傷害想象的主效應(yīng)顯著,人際責(zé)任的主效應(yīng)不顯著,傷害想象與人際責(zé)任的交互作用顯著,即在傷害想象的情境中,被試的疼痛共情水平更高;僅在傷害想象的情境中,人際責(zé)任高分組比低分組的疼痛共情水平更高。實驗二讓被試通觀察他人面部疼痛表情圖片并對其疼痛程度進行評定,并且在觀察過程中假設(shè)那些是受到被試懲罰的同學(xué)在受到電刺激時的面部表情,以此探討在傷害假設(shè)情境中,人際責(zé)任與疼痛共情的關(guān)系。共106名被試,其中,81名女生,25名男生。先請被試填寫一份大學(xué)生人際自立量表(ISSS-US),然后觀察圖片并評定圖片中人物的疼痛程度。實驗操作分別為:操作組(無傷害假設(shè)情境)、實驗組(傷害假設(shè)情境)。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)傷害假設(shè)情境中,人際責(zé)任的主效應(yīng)和交互作用均不顯著。研究結(jié)果部分支持了假設(shè),即人際責(zé)任與疼痛共情有關(guān),但這種關(guān)系主要發(fā)生在高自我卷入度的情境下。本研究在推進人格與疼痛共情的關(guān)系及其影響因素方面有一定貢獻,但還存在不足。
[Abstract]:The term empathy has shown many meanings since it appeared in the literature. A more uniform definition is the ability to think about others' thoughts, feelings, and actions. The resulting pain empathy is thought to be the perception, experience, and emotional response caused by pain to others, that is, empathy for the pain of others. Pain empathy plays an indispensable and positive role in both individual survival and interpersonal communication. There are many factors affecting pain empathy, among which personality factor is an important factor, but the relationship between personality and pain empathy needs to be further explored. In this study, an important trait of self-supporting personality, interpersonal responsibility, is chosen to explore the relationship between personality and empathy. Interpersonal responsibility refers to loyalty and trust, which embodies the characteristics of Chinese culture. This study assumes that interpersonal responsibility is associated with pain empathy and that this relationship is influenced by situational factors. In the situation of high degree of self-involvement and vivid image of injury imagination, the relationship between interpersonal responsibility and pain empathy is higher; in the situation where the degree of self-involvement is relatively low, the relationship between interpersonal responsibility and pain empathy is higher, while in the situation of relatively low degree of self-involvement, the relationship between interpersonal responsibility and pain empathy is higher. Interpersonal responsibility scores are low or may not be associated with pain empathy. In experiment one, participants were asked to observe pictures of pain in other people's body parts and assess their pain levels, and in the course of the observation, they said to themselves, "I caused the injury to him or her." At the same time, vividly visualize the specific situation that caused the person to be hurt in the picture, so as to explore the relationship between interpersonal responsibility and pain empathy in the situation of injury imagination. A total of 113 subjects, including 85 girls and 28 boys. Participants were asked to fill out a college student interpersonal support scale (ISSS-US), then observe the pictures and assess the pain level of the characters in the pictures. The experimental results were as follows: operation group (no injury imagination situation) and experimental group (injury imagination situation). The results showed that the main effect of injury imagination was significant, the main effect of interpersonal responsibility was not significant, the interaction between injury imagination and interpersonal responsibility was significant, that is, in the situation of injury imagination, the subjects' pain empathy level was higher; The high interpersonal responsibility group had a higher level of pain empathy than the low score group only in the context of injury imagination. Experiment two asked people to look at pictures of other people's facial pain expressions and assess their pain levels, and in the course of the observation assumed that those students who had been punished by the subjects had facial expressions when they were subjected to electrical stimulation. In order to explore the relationship between interpersonal responsibility and pain empathy in the injury hypothesis. A total of 106 subjects, including 81 girls and 25 boys. Participants were asked to fill out a college student interpersonal support scale (ISSS-US), then observe the pictures and assess the pain level of the characters in the pictures. The experimental results were as follows: operation group (no injury hypothetical situation) and experimental group (injury hypothesis situation). The results showed that the main effect and interaction of interpersonal responsibility were not significant in the injury hypothesis. The results support the hypothesis that interpersonal responsibility is related to pain empathy, but this relationship mainly occurs in the context of high degree of self involvement. This study has some contributions to promote the relationship between personality and pain empathy and its influencing factors, but there are still some shortcomings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：B848

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張偉;丁鳳琴;;大學(xué)生內(nèi)隱助人態(tài)度的情境效應(yīng)[J];重慶與世界(學(xué)術(shù)版);2014年04期

2 顧毅;龐萍;;翻譯教學(xué)中的翻譯情境意識(英文)[J];Teaching English in China;2002年03期

3 黃濤;論語言民俗情境的構(gòu)成與功能[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2000年04期

4 鄭信軍;動機與情境對不同自控水平兒童學(xué)業(yè)求助的影響[J];心理科學(xué);2000年01期

5 楊渝玲;情境因素——經(jīng)濟學(xué)分析之要件——當(dāng)代西方經(jīng)濟學(xué)方法論研究的哲學(xué)審視[J];嘉應(yīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年04期

6 朱秋飛;何貴兵;;傳統(tǒng)美德認同和責(zé)任情境對大學(xué)生責(zé)任行為傾向的影響[J];應(yīng)用心理學(xué);2011年01期

7 萬文濤;品德結(jié)構(gòu)新探[J];江西社會科學(xué);2004年04期

8 閆志英;盧家楣;;移情反應(yīng)的研究——基于個體傾向與情境的雙重視角[J];心理科學(xué);2012年06期

9 海春花;;交流意愿成因發(fā)展研究:從持久之個性特質(zhì)到動態(tài)之情境因素[J];陜西教育(高教版);2013年Z2期

10 何梟賢;;以情境為依托 以創(chuàng)新促會學(xué)——情境因素在學(xué)生學(xué)會學(xué)習(xí)英語課題中的應(yīng)用[J];文教資料;2006年21期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 田立新;羅品一;;鑄造情境培養(yǎng)表達[A];增強自主創(chuàng)新能力 促進吉林經(jīng)濟發(fā)展——啟明杯·吉林省第四屆科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集（下冊）[C];2006年

2 江根源;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)社區(qū)中的隱私關(guān)注與其互動情境間的作用關(guān)系[A];“傳播與中國·復(fù)旦論壇”（2013）——網(wǎng)絡(luò)化關(guān)系：新傳播與當(dāng)下中國論文集[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 吳燕 杭州師范大學(xué)教育科學(xué)學(xué)院心理系;分攤損失比分享收益更應(yīng)注重分配公平[N];中國社會科學(xué)報;2012年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 呂林;情境感知通信的計算機免疫方法研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2012年

2 張劍　;影響員工創(chuàng)造性績效的組織情境因素及動機機制研究[D];首都師范大學(xué);2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 高晶晶;跨情境下青少年慈善捐助歸因的特點及其影響機制[D];寧夏大學(xué);2015年

2 張宇馳;求偶相關(guān)情境對面孔學(xué)習(xí)時間分配的影響[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2015年

3 代濤濤;對人知覺和評價中的內(nèi)容偏好及情境效應(yīng)[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年

4 姚瑤;負性情緒與聽覺注意分散對電廠操作員情境意識的影響[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2015年

5 趙建波;基于知識情境的知識推送技術(shù)研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2015年

6 許慧;情境因素對消費者在線沖動購買影響的實證分析[D];湘潭大學(xué);2015年

7 張建麗;職業(yè)選拔情境中人格測量的qIAT技術(shù)應(yīng)用探索[D];西北師范大學(xué);2015年

8 阮盼;情境預(yù)防在我國城市社區(qū)治安防控的應(yīng)用研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

9 高熙鴿;情境預(yù)防理論視域下的基層腐敗治理研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

10 朱芊里;人際責(zé)任與疼痛共情的關(guān)系探究[D];西南大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號：2218557