主角情緒對(duì)道德判斷的影響
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-24 07:16
【摘要】：情緒在道德判斷過(guò)程中扮演著重要的角色,不同情緒狀態(tài)會(huì)對(duì)個(gè)體的道德判斷產(chǎn)生影響。已有的有關(guān)情緒對(duì)道德判斷影響的研究中,研究者大都通過(guò)直接誘發(fā)被試相應(yīng)的情緒狀態(tài)探討情緒對(duì)道德判斷的影響,而沒(méi)有利用道德兩難故事中的人物角色情緒對(duì)此問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究,因此本文將利用道德兩難故事中的人物(道德行為實(shí)施人、被挽救者、犧牲者)情緒探討主角情緒對(duì)個(gè)體道德判斷的影響。 研究-主要探討故事中道德行為實(shí)施人為主角時(shí),主角決策前的情緒狀態(tài)、決策后的情緒狀態(tài)以及決策前后情緒狀態(tài)的轉(zhuǎn)換是否會(huì)對(duì)個(gè)體道德判斷產(chǎn)生影響,包括三個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)。實(shí)驗(yàn)-從道德行為實(shí)施人決策前情緒狀態(tài)的角度探討主角情緒對(duì)道德判斷產(chǎn)生的影響,采用3(決策前道德行為實(shí)施人情緒類型：愉悅組、悲傷組、控制組)×2(道德困境類型：“個(gè)人道德困境”、“非個(gè)人道德困境”)的兩因素混合實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),自變量為決策前道德行為實(shí)施人情緒類型和道德困境類型,其中被試間變量為決策前道德行為實(shí)施人情緒類型,被試內(nèi)變量為道德困境類型,因變量為被試對(duì)功利性判斷在多大程度上違反道德的評(píng)分。實(shí)驗(yàn)二從道德行為實(shí)施人決策后情緒狀態(tài)的角度探討主角情緒對(duì)道德判斷產(chǎn)生的影響,采用3(決策后道德行為實(shí)施人情緒類型：愉悅組、痛苦組、控制組)×2(道德困境類型：“個(gè)人道德困境”、“非個(gè)人道德困境”)的兩因素混合實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),自變量為決策后道德行為實(shí)施人情緒類型和道德困境類型,其中被試間變量為決策后道德行為實(shí)施人情緒類型,被試內(nèi)變量為道德困境類型,因變量為被試對(duì)功利性判斷在多大程度上違反道德的評(píng)分。實(shí)驗(yàn)三從道德行為實(shí)施人決策前后情緒狀態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)換的角度探討主角情緒對(duì)道德判斷的影響,采用5(道德行為實(shí)施人情緒轉(zhuǎn)換類型：悲傷轉(zhuǎn)痛苦組、悲傷轉(zhuǎn)愉悅組、愉悅轉(zhuǎn)痛苦組、愉悅轉(zhuǎn)愉悅組、控制組)×2(道德困境類型：“個(gè)人道德困境”、“非個(gè)人道德困境”)的兩因素混合實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),自變量為道德行為實(shí)施人情緒轉(zhuǎn)換類型和道德困境類型,其中被試間變量為道德行為實(shí)施人情緒轉(zhuǎn)換類型,被試內(nèi)變量為道德困境類型,因變量為被試對(duì)功利性判斷在多大程度上違反道德的評(píng)分。 研究二主要探討故事中被挽救者為主角時(shí),主角情緒狀態(tài)是否會(huì)對(duì)個(gè)體的道德判斷產(chǎn)生影響,由一個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)構(gòu)成。實(shí)驗(yàn)四從被挽救者情緒狀態(tài)的角度探討主角情緒對(duì)道德判斷的影響,采用3(被挽救者情緒類型：愉悅組、悲傷組、控制組)×2(道德困境類型：“個(gè)人道德困境”、“非個(gè)人道德困境”)的兩因素混合實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),自變量為被挽救者情緒類型和道德困境類型,其中被試間變量為被挽救者情緒類型,被試內(nèi)變量為道德困境類型,因變量為被試選擇功利性判斷可能性的評(píng)分。 研究三主要探討故事中犧牲者為主角時(shí),主角情緒狀態(tài)是否會(huì)對(duì)個(gè)體的道德判斷產(chǎn)生影響,由一個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)構(gòu)成。實(shí)驗(yàn)五從犧牲者情緒狀態(tài)的角度探討主角情緒對(duì)道德判斷的影響,采用3(犧牲者情緒類型：愉悅組、悲傷組、控制組)×2(道德困境類型：“個(gè)人道德困境”、“非個(gè)人道德困境”)的兩因素混合實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),自變量為犧牲者情緒類型和道德困境類型,其中被試間變量為犧牲者情緒類型,被試內(nèi)變量為道德困境類型,因變量為被試選擇功利性判斷可能性的評(píng)分。 通過(guò)三個(gè)研究得出以下幾個(gè)結(jié)論：(1)主角情緒會(huì)影響道德判斷,道德行為實(shí)施人決策前處于悲傷情緒狀態(tài)、決策后處于痛苦情緒狀態(tài)、決策前后情緒轉(zhuǎn)換為悲傷轉(zhuǎn)痛苦時(shí)被試對(duì)其功利性判斷評(píng)價(jià)得更符合道德,被挽救者處于悲傷情緒狀態(tài)時(shí)被試選擇功利性判斷可能性增加,犧牲者處于愉悅情緒狀態(tài)時(shí)被試選擇功利性判斷可能性增加；(2)道德困境類型會(huì)影響道德判斷,相對(duì)于“非個(gè)人道德困境”,被試對(duì)“個(gè)人道德困境”選擇功利性判斷評(píng)價(jià)得更不符合道德,并且在“個(gè)人道德困境”中選擇功利性判斷的可能性更��；(3)主角情緒對(duì)道德判斷的影響,會(huì)因?yàn)橹鹘乔榫w在故事中出現(xiàn)的場(chǎng)合不同而產(chǎn)生不同的影響,也會(huì)因?yàn)橹鹘乔榫w出現(xiàn)不同轉(zhuǎn)換而產(chǎn)生不同的影響；(4)積極、消極情緒會(huì)因?yàn)橹赶虿煌鹘嵌鴮?duì)道德判斷產(chǎn)生不同的影響。
[Abstract]:Emotion plays an important role in the process of moral judgment, and different emotional states can influence individual moral judgment. In the previous studies on the influence of emotion on moral judgment, researchers mostly explore the influence of emotion on moral judgment by directly inducing the corresponding emotional states of subjects, but do not use moral dilemma stories. Character emotions in the moral dilemma are studied in this paper, so we will explore the influence of the protagonist's emotions on individual moral judgment by using the characters'emotions in the moral dilemma.
This study mainly explores whether the protagonist's emotional state before decision-making, the emotional state after decision-making, and the transition of emotional state before and after decision-making will affect the individual's moral judgment when the moral behavior implementer is the protagonist in the story. For the influence of moral judgment, a two-factor mixed experimental design was adopted, in which three emotional types (pleasure group, sadness group, control group) and two emotional types (moral dilemma type: "personal moral dilemma", "non-personal moral dilemma") were used. Among them, the variables between subjects were the emotional types of the implementers of moral behavior before decision-making, the internal variables were the types of moral dilemma, and the dependent variables were the extent to which the subjects'judgments of utilitarianism violated morality. (post-decision moral behavior implementers'emotional types: pleasure group, pain group, control group)*2 (moral dilemma type: personal moral dilemma, non-personal moral dilemma) two-factor mixed experimental design. The independent variables were the emotional type and moral dilemma type of post-decision moral behavior implementers. Among them, the variables were decision-making hindsight. In the third experiment, the influence of protagonist's emotion on moral judgment was discussed from the point of view of mood state transition before and after decision-making, and the effect of protagonist's emotion on moral judgment was studied by using 5 (moral behavior implementer's mood transition) Change type: Sadness to Pain group, Sadness to Pleasure group, Pleasure to Pain group, Pleasure to Pleasure group, Control group *2 (moral dilemma type: personal moral dilemma), non-personal moral dilemma) two-factor mixed experimental design, independent variables for moral behavior to implement the type of human emotional change and moral dilemma type, among which the subjects changed. Quantity is the type of emotional transformation of moral behavior implementers, the internal variables are the type of moral dilemma, and the dependent variables are the degree to which the subjects'utilitarian judgments violate moral standards.
The second study explored whether the protagonist's emotional state had an effect on the individual's moral judgment when the rescued person was the main character, consisting of an experiment. Moral dilemma type: personal moral dilemma and non-personal moral dilemma. The independent variables were the emotional type and moral dilemma type of the rescued. The variables between the rescued were the emotional type of the rescued, the internal variables were the moral dilemma type, and the dependent variable was the possibility of utilitarian judgment. Score.
The third study explored whether the emotional state of the protagonist affected the moral judgment of the individual when the victim was the hero in the story, consisting of an experiment. Dilemma type: Personal moral dilemma and non-personal moral dilemma. The independent variables were sacrificial emotional type and moral dilemma type. The variables between the subjects were sacrificial emotional type, the variables within the subjects were moral dilemma type, and the dependent variables were the evaluation of the possibility of utilitarian judgment.
The following conclusions can be drawn from three studies: (1) The protagonist's emotions affect moral judgment. The implementer of moral behavior is in a state of sadness before decision-making and in a state of pain after decision-making. The possibility of utilitarian judgment increased when the victim was in the state of pleasure, and the possibility of utilitarian judgment increased when the victim was in the state of pleasure. (2) The types of moral dilemma would affect the moral judgment. Compared with the non-personal moral dilemma, the subjects'evaluation of the choice of utilitarian judgment of "personal moral dilemma" was more unethical and unethical. And the possibility of choosing utilitarian judgment in the "personal moral dilemma" is less; (3) the influence of the protagonist's emotions on moral judgment will be different because of the different occasions in which the protagonist's emotions appear in the story, and will be different because of the different changes in the protagonist's emotions; (4) positive and negative emotions will be different because of the referent. It has different effects on moral judgment to different protagonists.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B842.6
本文編號(hào)：2200028
[Abstract]:Emotion plays an important role in the process of moral judgment, and different emotional states can influence individual moral judgment. In the previous studies on the influence of emotion on moral judgment, researchers mostly explore the influence of emotion on moral judgment by directly inducing the corresponding emotional states of subjects, but do not use moral dilemma stories. Character emotions in the moral dilemma are studied in this paper, so we will explore the influence of the protagonist's emotions on individual moral judgment by using the characters'emotions in the moral dilemma.
This study mainly explores whether the protagonist's emotional state before decision-making, the emotional state after decision-making, and the transition of emotional state before and after decision-making will affect the individual's moral judgment when the moral behavior implementer is the protagonist in the story. For the influence of moral judgment, a two-factor mixed experimental design was adopted, in which three emotional types (pleasure group, sadness group, control group) and two emotional types (moral dilemma type: "personal moral dilemma", "non-personal moral dilemma") were used. Among them, the variables between subjects were the emotional types of the implementers of moral behavior before decision-making, the internal variables were the types of moral dilemma, and the dependent variables were the extent to which the subjects'judgments of utilitarianism violated morality. (post-decision moral behavior implementers'emotional types: pleasure group, pain group, control group)*2 (moral dilemma type: personal moral dilemma, non-personal moral dilemma) two-factor mixed experimental design. The independent variables were the emotional type and moral dilemma type of post-decision moral behavior implementers. Among them, the variables were decision-making hindsight. In the third experiment, the influence of protagonist's emotion on moral judgment was discussed from the point of view of mood state transition before and after decision-making, and the effect of protagonist's emotion on moral judgment was studied by using 5 (moral behavior implementer's mood transition) Change type: Sadness to Pain group, Sadness to Pleasure group, Pleasure to Pain group, Pleasure to Pleasure group, Control group *2 (moral dilemma type: personal moral dilemma), non-personal moral dilemma) two-factor mixed experimental design, independent variables for moral behavior to implement the type of human emotional change and moral dilemma type, among which the subjects changed. Quantity is the type of emotional transformation of moral behavior implementers, the internal variables are the type of moral dilemma, and the dependent variables are the degree to which the subjects'utilitarian judgments violate moral standards.
The second study explored whether the protagonist's emotional state had an effect on the individual's moral judgment when the rescued person was the main character, consisting of an experiment. Moral dilemma type: personal moral dilemma and non-personal moral dilemma. The independent variables were the emotional type and moral dilemma type of the rescued. The variables between the rescued were the emotional type of the rescued, the internal variables were the moral dilemma type, and the dependent variable was the possibility of utilitarian judgment. Score.
The third study explored whether the emotional state of the protagonist affected the moral judgment of the individual when the victim was the hero in the story, consisting of an experiment. Dilemma type: Personal moral dilemma and non-personal moral dilemma. The independent variables were sacrificial emotional type and moral dilemma type. The variables between the subjects were sacrificial emotional type, the variables within the subjects were moral dilemma type, and the dependent variables were the evaluation of the possibility of utilitarian judgment.
The following conclusions can be drawn from three studies: (1) The protagonist's emotions affect moral judgment. The implementer of moral behavior is in a state of sadness before decision-making and in a state of pain after decision-making. The possibility of utilitarian judgment increased when the victim was in the state of pleasure, and the possibility of utilitarian judgment increased when the victim was in the state of pleasure. (2) The types of moral dilemma would affect the moral judgment. Compared with the non-personal moral dilemma, the subjects'evaluation of the choice of utilitarian judgment of "personal moral dilemma" was more unethical and unethical. And the possibility of choosing utilitarian judgment in the "personal moral dilemma" is less; (3) the influence of the protagonist's emotions on moral judgment will be different because of the different occasions in which the protagonist's emotions appear in the story, and will be different because of the different changes in the protagonist's emotions; (4) positive and negative emotions will be different because of the referent. It has different effects on moral judgment to different protagonists.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B842.6
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 肖前國(guó);;不同情緒與不同道德自我喚醒對(duì)高中生道德判斷影響的調(diào)查研究[J];廣西教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期
2 李付丹;孫睿杰;胡園園;簡(jiǎn)曉微;;讀者情緒和主角情緒對(duì)記敘文理解的影響[J];科協(xié)論壇(下半月);2010年08期
3 何蔚祺;羅文波;;林德道德判斷測(cè)驗(yàn)述評(píng)[J];上海教育科研;2007年05期
4 丁念友;不同智力水平與情緒狀態(tài)對(duì)初中學(xué)生認(rèn)知操作的影響及相互關(guān)系的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;1997年04期
5 徐平;遲毓凱;;道德判斷的社會(huì)直覺(jué)模型述評(píng)[J];心理科學(xué);2007年02期
6 王云強(qiáng);郭本禹;吳慧紅;;情緒狀態(tài)對(duì)大學(xué)生道德判斷能力的影響[J];心理科學(xué);2007年06期
7 陳麗;張慶林;嚴(yán)霞;張穎;廖祥慧;陳誼;;漢語(yǔ)字謎原型激活中的情緒促進(jìn)效應(yīng)[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期
8 王艷梅;郭德俊;;積極情緒對(duì)任務(wù)轉(zhuǎn)換的影響[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期
9 鄒吉林;張小聰;張環(huán);于靚;周仁來(lái);;超越效價(jià)和喚醒——情緒的動(dòng)機(jī)維度模型述評(píng)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2011年09期
10 田學(xué)紅;楊群;張德玄;張燁;;道德直覺(jué)加工機(jī)制的理論構(gòu)想[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2011年10期
，本文編號(hào)：2200028
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2200028.html
最近更新
教材專著
