【摘要】：情緒啟動(dòng)和語(yǔ)義啟動(dòng)的強(qiáng)弱快慢以及加工過(guò)程是獨(dú)立還是平行一直是研究者關(guān)注的熱點(diǎn)，而現(xiàn)有的研究大多是對(duì)兩種啟動(dòng)進(jìn)行間接對(duì)比，本研究使用經(jīng)過(guò)匹配的實(shí)驗(yàn)材料和相同的實(shí)驗(yàn)任務(wù)，結(jié)合ERP技術(shù)對(duì)情緒啟動(dòng)和語(yǔ)義啟動(dòng)做直接比較，，以期為現(xiàn)有的兩種啟動(dòng)之間的比較給出更為直接和客觀的證據(jù)，并對(duì)它們之間的爭(zhēng)論做出一些解釋。 方法：采用經(jīng)過(guò)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化匹配的實(shí)驗(yàn)材料和“圖—詞”范式，設(shè)置SOA為250ms，實(shí)驗(yàn)任務(wù)分別為情緒效價(jià)判斷任務(wù)和語(yǔ)義分類任務(wù)，使用事件相關(guān)電位技術(shù)對(duì)自動(dòng)化加工水平下的情緒啟動(dòng)和語(yǔ)義啟動(dòng)之間的異同作比較研究。 結(jié)果：對(duì)行為結(jié)果的分析表明，在SOA=250ms時(shí)出現(xiàn)了典型的情緒啟動(dòng)和語(yǔ)義啟動(dòng)效應(yīng)，均表現(xiàn)為啟靶關(guān)系一致時(shí)促進(jìn)對(duì)目標(biāo)刺激的加工，啟靶關(guān)系不一致時(shí)阻礙對(duì)目標(biāo)刺激的加工。LPC的潛伏期結(jié)果分析發(fā)現(xiàn)，啟靶關(guān)系主效應(yīng)顯著，F(xiàn) (1,18)=6.164，p 0.05，偏η2=0.256。相比于啟靶不一致關(guān)系(128.7ms)，啟靶一致時(shí)LPC的潛伏期更短(122.5ms)；將各條件與其相應(yīng)的基線條件進(jìn)行配對(duì)樣本t檢驗(yàn)，結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)：在P4，P3，Pz點(diǎn)上，情緒啟動(dòng)不一致條件的潛伏期顯著長(zhǎng)于相應(yīng)的基線條件；在Pz點(diǎn)上，情緒啟動(dòng)一致條件的潛伏期顯著短于相應(yīng)基線條件。Beta波分析結(jié)果表明，在目標(biāo)刺激后200-300ms時(shí)間段內(nèi)，啟動(dòng)類型與電極位置交互作用顯著，校正后F (4.20075.604)=2.671，p 0.05，偏η2=0.129；進(jìn)一步t檢驗(yàn)發(fā)現(xiàn)在F4電極位置處，相比于語(yǔ)義啟動(dòng)，情緒啟動(dòng)的能量增強(qiáng)（ERS）更大。除小波分析外，行為結(jié)果和腦電數(shù)據(jù)的分析均未見(jiàn)與任務(wù)有關(guān)的交互作用。 結(jié)論：1.在自動(dòng)化加工水平上，在對(duì)信息的認(rèn)知評(píng)價(jià)階段，人腦對(duì)情緒信息流更加敏感；2.在自動(dòng)化加工水平上，情緒啟動(dòng)和語(yǔ)義啟動(dòng)的加工速度相同；3.在自動(dòng)化加工水平上，情緒啟動(dòng)和語(yǔ)義啟動(dòng)是相對(duì)獨(dú)立的兩個(gè)過(guò)程。
[Abstract]:The speed of emotional priming and semantic priming and whether the processing process is independent or parallel has always been the focus of attention of researchers, but most of the existing studies are indirect comparison of the two kinds of priming. In this study, the matched experimental materials and the same task were used to directly compare emotional priming and semantic priming with ERP technology, in order to provide more direct and objective evidence for the comparison between the two kinds of priming. And make some explanation to the argument between them. Methods: using standardized matching experimental materials and "graph word" paradigm, the SOA was set to 250 ms.The experimental tasks were emotion titer judgment task and semantic classification task, respectively. Event-related potentials were used to compare the similarities and differences between emotional priming and semantic priming at automated processing level. Results: the analysis of behavioral results showed that there were typical emotional priming and semantic priming effects in SOA=250ms, both of which promoted the processing of target stimuli when the starting-target relationship was the same. The results of latency analysis of LPC, which hinders the processing of target stimulation when the relationship between the target and the target is inconsistent, shows that the main effect of the starting-target relationship is significant (F _ (1 / 18) 6.164 / p 0.05, 畏 _ (2) = 0.256). The incubation period of LPC is shorter (122.5ms) than that of 128.7ms, and it is found that at the point of P4 / P3 / Pz, each condition is matched with its corresponding baseline condition. The incubation period of emotional priming inconsistent condition was significantly longer than that of corresponding baseline condition, and at Pz, the latency of emotional priming consistent condition was significantly shorter than that of corresponding baseline condition. Beta wave analysis showed that, in the 200-300ms period after target stimulation, the latency of the condition was significantly shorter than that of the corresponding baseline condition. After correction, F (4.20075.604) 2.671 (p) 0.05, 畏 _ (2) (0.129). Further t test showed that the energy of emotional activation was greater than that of semantic priming at F4 electrode position. With the exception of wavelet analysis, there was no interaction between behavioral results and EEG data. Conclusion 1. At the level of automation, the human brain is more sensitive to the flow of emotional information in the cognitive evaluation of information. At the level of automation, the processing speed of emotional priming and semantic priming is the same as that of semantic priming. At the level of automation, emotional priming and semantic priming are two relatively independent processes.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B842

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 蔣重清;楊麗珠;劉穎;Tarik Bel-Bahar;;閾下負(fù)性情緒引起兒童和成人相反的判斷偏向[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2010年01期

2 郭桃梅,彭聃齡;從語(yǔ)義啟動(dòng)效應(yīng)看事件相關(guān)電位N400的實(shí)質(zhì)[J];心理科學(xué);2003年04期

3 蔣重清,楊麗珠;情緒啟動(dòng)研究[J];心理科學(xué);2005年02期

4 蔣重清;楊麗珠;劉穎;;閾下情緒STROOP效應(yīng)發(fā)展特點(diǎn)[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

5 王青,楊玉芳;語(yǔ)義啟動(dòng)模型以及啟動(dòng)范圍[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2002年02期

6 呂勇,魏景漢;語(yǔ)義距離半球效應(yīng)的ERP研究[J];心理學(xué)探新;2005年03期

7 蔣重清;肖艷麗;劉穎;楊麗珠;渠育紅;邰圓圓;齊星;吳琦;王莉;王巖;周志娟;;情緒啟動(dòng)與語(yǔ)義啟動(dòng)的比較[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2012年12期

8 伍姍姍;譚金鳳;王麗君;陳安濤;;閾下語(yǔ)義啟動(dòng)效應(yīng)影響因素述評(píng)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2013年04期

本文編號(hào)：2145597