本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯 + 內(nèi)隱記憶�。� 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：21世紀(jì)是網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息時代,人們越來越離不開網(wǎng)絡(luò),心理科學(xué)對網(wǎng)絡(luò)的關(guān)注也越來越多,但主要集中在人格、社會、學(xué)習(xí)、決策和網(wǎng)癮等方向,而鮮有網(wǎng)絡(luò)對正常使用者認(rèn)知影響的研究。直到2011年,Sparrow等人在Science期刊上發(fā)表了第一篇影響力較大的網(wǎng)絡(luò)對記憶影響的文章,人們才真正開始關(guān)注網(wǎng)絡(luò)對認(rèn)知的改變。然而,到目前為止尚缺乏網(wǎng)絡(luò)內(nèi)容對認(rèn)知影響的研究。Sparrow等人的研究雖然證實網(wǎng)絡(luò)改變了人的記憶方式,但未探究更深層次的原因。網(wǎng)絡(luò)化的大環(huán)境是每個社會人都必須適應(yīng)的不可逆的歷史潮流,正如我們的祖先適應(yīng)物競天擇的大自然,從這個意義上講,網(wǎng)絡(luò)可能導(dǎo)致人們的認(rèn)知發(fā)生進(jìn)化意義上的改變。為了從進(jìn)化的角度探究網(wǎng)絡(luò)是否使我們的記憶產(chǎn)生了認(rèn)知加工深度的改變,又基于內(nèi)隱記憶和外顯記憶的相對獨(dú)立性,我們進(jìn)行了如下的兩個研究：研究一,采用Stroop變式任務(wù)及知覺辨認(rèn)范式探究網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯的內(nèi)隱記憶優(yōu)勢效應(yīng)。實驗設(shè)計為單因素2水平(網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯、非網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯)的被試內(nèi)設(shè)計,被試為華中師范大學(xué)34名大學(xué)生。研究結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯在Stroop變式任務(wù)階段反應(yīng)時顯著高于非網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯,而在知覺辨認(rèn)任務(wù)中網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯的反應(yīng)時顯著低于非網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯,且再認(rèn)正確率顯著高于非網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯。研究二,采用詞性辨別任務(wù)及加工分離范式探究網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯的外顯記憶優(yōu)勢效應(yīng)。實驗設(shè)計為單因素2水平(網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯、非網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯)的被試內(nèi)設(shè)計,被試為華中師范大學(xué)35名大學(xué)生。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯在屬性辨別任務(wù)階段反應(yīng)時顯著低于非網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯,但網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯的再認(rèn)正確率顯著高于非網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯,且網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯的自動提取成分顯著高于非網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯,而兩類詞的意識性提取成分則無顯著差異。兩個研究的結(jié)果均證實了網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞匯的記憶優(yōu)勢效應(yīng),證實了網(wǎng)絡(luò)對記憶的改變,但這一結(jié)論還需要進(jìn)一步從年齡及網(wǎng)絡(luò)情境啟動的角度進(jìn)一步驗證。
[Abstract]:The 21st century is the era of network information, people are more and more inseparable from the network, and psychological science is paying more and more attention to the network, but it is mainly focused on the direction of personality, society, learning, decision-making and Internet addiction. However, there is little research on the effect of network on normal users' cognition. It was not until 2011, when Sparrow et al. published the first article in the journal Science on the influence of the Internet on memory, that people really began to pay attention to the changes in cognition through the Internet. So far, however, there is a lack of research on the effects of web content on cognition. Although the research by Sparrow et al confirms that the network has changed the way people remember, they have not explored the deeper reasons. The networked environment is an irreversible historical trend to which every human being must adapt, just as our ancestors adapted to the natural selection of nature. In this sense, the network may lead to evolutionary changes in people's cognition. In order to explore whether the network changes the cognitive processing depth of our memory from the perspective of evolution, and based on the relative independence of implicit memory and explicit memory, we have carried out the following two studies: first, Stroop variant task and perceptual recognition paradigm were used to explore the implicit memory advantage effect of network vocabulary. The experiment was designed with single factor and two levels (network vocabulary, non-network vocabulary). The subjects were 34 college students from Central China normal University. The results show that the reaction time of online vocabulary in Stroop variant task stage is significantly higher than that in non-network vocabulary, while in perceptual recognition task, the reaction time of network vocabulary is significantly lower than that of non-network vocabulary, and the recognition accuracy rate is significantly higher than that of non-network vocabulary. In the second study, the explicit memory advantage effect of network vocabulary was explored by using the task of part of speech discrimination and processing separation paradigm. The experiment was designed with single factor and two levels (network vocabulary, non-network vocabulary). The subjects were 35 college students from Central China normal University. The results showed that the response time of network vocabulary in the task phase of attribute discrimination was significantly lower than that of non-network vocabulary, but the recognition accuracy of network vocabulary was significantly higher than that of non-network vocabulary, and the automatic extraction of network vocabulary was significantly higher than that of non-network word. However, there was no significant difference between the two categories of words. The results of both studies confirm the memory advantage effect of network vocabulary and the change of network memory, but this conclusion needs to be further verified from the point of view of age and network situation priming.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：B842.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 郭力平,楊治良;內(nèi)隱和外顯記憶的發(fā)展研究[J];心理科學(xué);1998年04期

2 朱瀅,黎天騁,周治金,肖莉;詞干補(bǔ)筆與速示器辨認(rèn)的起動效應(yīng)保持過程的比較[J];心理學(xué)報;1989年02期

3 于睿;毛偉賓;賈U，

本文編號：2114853