本文選題：具身認(rèn)知 + 隱喻　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：具身認(rèn)知受到越來越多關(guān)注,社會(huì)心理學(xué)家認(rèn)為社會(huì)關(guān)系與個(gè)體水平的認(rèn)知一樣都包含了具身方面,這一問題最直接的解釋框架是關(guān)系模式理論(Smith,2008)。Fiske認(rèn)為人類有四種基本關(guān)系類型：公共共享(CS)、等級(jí)排序(AR)、平等匹配(EM)和市場(chǎng)定價(jià)(MP),前三種都是具身的,與不同的具身線索存在聯(lián)系。公平是平等匹配關(guān)系的體現(xiàn),但還沒有關(guān)于其具身線索的相關(guān)實(shí)證研究。本文根據(jù)前人的研究和理論提出了一核心假設(shè)：公平是具身于平衡的。共設(shè)計(jì)了四個(gè)研究對(duì)于這一假設(shè)進(jìn)行考察。 研究一,采用問卷調(diào)查法,考察是否存在平衡—公平圖式,結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)：(1)對(duì)于“公平”,個(gè)體傾向于選擇平衡圖案來匹配,而(2)對(duì)于“不公平”,個(gè)體傾向于選擇平衡圖案來匹配。也就是說研究一初步證實(shí)了平衡—公平圖式。 研究二,采用情境故事法,進(jìn)一步驗(yàn)證平衡—公平這一圖式。相對(duì)于研究一中平衡、不平衡圖案的選擇,研究二還引入了平衡和公平的不同程度,操控公平的不同程度,考察是否會(huì)影響被試對(duì)不同平衡程度圖案的選擇。結(jié)果進(jìn)一步證實(shí)了“平衡—公平”圖式。 研究三,采用經(jīng)典的啟動(dòng)范式考察了對(duì)于平衡的操縱是否會(huì)影響公平的判斷過程。研究結(jié)果表明：(1)在一致性條件下被試反應(yīng)更快,正確率更高；(2)在不一致性條件,被試反應(yīng)更慢,正確率越低。也就是說操縱平衡會(huì)影響公平判斷過程。 研究四,通過情景故事法考察操縱平衡是否會(huì)影響公平判斷結(jié)果。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)：平衡組和控制組被試在公平判斷結(jié)果上顯著高于不平衡組被試�？傊芯孔C實(shí)了操控平衡會(huì)影響公平判斷結(jié)果。
[Abstract]:More and more attention has been paid to physical cognition. Social psychologists believe that social relations and cognition at individual level both contain physical aspects. The most direct explanatory framework of this problem is the relational model theory Smiths2008.Fiske believes that there are four basic types of human relations: public sharing, ranking, equal matching, and market pricing. The first three are all physical, linked to different physical cues. Fairness is the embodiment of equality matching relationship, but there is no relevant empirical research on its clue. Based on previous studies and theories, this paper puts forward a core hypothesis: equity is balanced. Four studies were designed to investigate this hypothesis. First, a questionnaire survey was used to investigate the existence of a balanced and fair schema. The results showed that: 1) for "fairness", individuals tend to choose a balanced pattern to match. For inequity, individuals tend to choose balanced patterns to match. That is to say, study one preliminarily confirms the balance-fair schema. In the second study, we use the situational story method to further verify the balance-fair schema. Compared with the selection of equilibrium and unbalanced patterns in the first middle school, the second study also introduced the different degrees of balance and fairness, the different degree of manipulation of fairness, and examined whether the choice of patterns of different equilibrium degree would be affected by the participants. The results further confirm the "balance-equity" schemas. Third, the classical priming paradigm is used to examine whether the manipulation of equilibrium affects the process of fairness. The results showed that under the consistency condition, the reaction of the subjects was faster and the correct rate was higher. (2) under the condition of inconsistency, the reaction of the subjects was slower and the correct rate was lower. That is to say, the manipulation balance will affect the process of fair judgment. Fourth, the situation story method is used to investigate whether the manipulation balance will affect the result of fair judgment. The results showed that the balance group and the control group were significantly higher than the unbalanced group in the result of fair judgment. All in all, studies have shown that manipulating the balance affects the outcome of fair judgment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B848

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 趙晶;石向?qū)?;社會(huì)認(rèn)知具身化:解釋、研究領(lǐng)域與問題[J];心理研究;2011年03期

2 趙國祥;張淑熙;;黨政干部自律品質(zhì)的研究[J];心理科學(xué);2006年01期

3 薛燦燦;葉浩生;;具身社會(huì)認(rèn)知:認(rèn)知心理學(xué)的生態(tài)學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向[J];心理科學(xué);2011年05期

4 葉浩生;;具身認(rèn)知:認(rèn)知心理學(xué)的新取向[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2010年05期

5 伍秋萍;馮聰;陳斌斌;;具身框架下的社會(huì)認(rèn)知研究述評(píng)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2011年03期

6 謝久書;張常青;王瑞明;陸直;;知覺符號(hào)理論及其研究范式[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2011年09期

7 范琪;;具身社會(huì)認(rèn)知:社會(huì)認(rèn)知研究的新動(dòng)向[J];徐州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年02期

8 王瑞安;桑標(biāo);;具身視角下的社會(huì)認(rèn)知[J];心理科學(xué);2012年05期

9 武悅;王愛平;蔣獎(jiǎng);古麗扎·伯克力;;啟動(dòng)任務(wù)中重量與權(quán)力的關(guān)系[J];心理學(xué)探新;2013年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 周浩;組織員工分配公平感的社會(huì)比較機(jī)制研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2002128