本文選題：沖突 + 被洞悉錯覺　； 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我們的日常互動中,想要隱瞞或者傳達自己的內(nèi)心感受時,我們總是會高估自己被洞悉的程度,Gilovich將它定義為“因為過高估計他人對自己的洞悉水平而產(chǎn)生的被看穿的錯誤知覺,我們稱之為被洞悉錯覺(illusion of transparency)。" 這種錯覺已經(jīng)在許多人際交往的領(lǐng)域內(nèi)被證實,包括演講、談判、親密關(guān)系等,本研究希望將這一錯覺的研究領(lǐng)域進一步擴展。我們知道,當代社會群體性沖突事件頻繁發(fā)生,而認知偏差是沖突發(fā)生的一個重要心理因素,被洞悉錯覺正是認知偏差的一種。本研究通過自編沖突案例的實驗材料,啟動三種角色(包括沖突一方的直接利益群體,非直接利益群體,沖突另一方優(yōu)勢群體)來研究群體性沖突的過程中不同群體的被洞悉錯覺,并且進一步了解不同角色對群體性沖突事件的其他認知評價。 研究結(jié)果顯示： 1、在群體性沖突中,直接利益群體會存在被洞悉錯覺,即高估了沖突另一方對自己憤怒情緒的洞悉程度。 2、在群體性沖突中,參與沖突的非直接利益群體也存在被洞悉錯覺,并且這種錯覺的強度要大于直接利益群體。 3、在沖突發(fā)生的不同階段,憤怒情緒強度不同,被洞悉錯覺程度也就不同,憤怒情緒強度越高,被洞悉錯覺越大。 4、在群體性沖突中,自我卷入程度與自我知覺到的被洞悉程度之間呈現(xiàn)正相關(guān),自我卷入程度越高,自我知覺到的被洞悉感就越強。 5、在群體性沖突中,權(quán)力感與自我知覺到的被洞悉感之間呈現(xiàn)負相關(guān),權(quán)力感越低,自我知覺到的被洞悉感就越強烈。 6、沖突中的直接利益群體、非直接利益群體、沖突優(yōu)勢群體三者之間對沖突的其他認知評價存在差異,包括對補償標準的評價,對政府處理能力的評價,對采取不同行為模式認知、對自我利益和公共利益的價值取向。
[Abstract]:In our daily interactions, when we want to hide or convey our inner feelings, We tend to overestimate the extent to which we are perceived. Gilovich defines it as "the perceived misperception that results from overestimation of others' level of insight into ourselves." We call it "illusions of transparency." this illusion has been proven in many areas of interpersonal communication, including speech, negotiation, intimacy, and so on. This study hopes to further expand the field of research on this illusion. We know that group conflict occurs frequently in contemporary society, and cognitive bias is an important psychological factor of conflict, and perceived illusion is just one kind of cognitive bias. In this study, three kinds of roles (direct interest group, indirect interest group, direct interest group) were initiated through the experimental data of conflict cases. To study the perceived delusion of different groups in the process of group conflict, and to further understand the other cognitive evaluation of group conflict events by different roles. The results show that: 1, in group conflict, Direct interest groups have the illusion of being perceived, that is, overestimating the extent to which the other party to the conflict is aware of their anger. 2. In a group conflict, there is also an illusion of perceived perception among the indirect interest groups involved in the conflict. And the intensity of this illusion is greater than that of the direct interest group. 3. At different stages of conflict, the intensity of anger is different, the degree of perceived delusion is different. The higher the intensity of anger emotion, the greater the perceived illusion. 4. In group conflicts, There is a positive correlation between the degree of self-involvement and the degree of perceived insight. The higher the degree of self-involvement, the stronger the sense of perceived insight. There is a negative correlation between the sense of power and the sense of perceived insight. The lower the sense of power, the stronger the sense of perceived insight. 6. There are differences in other cognitive evaluation of conflict among the three groups, including the evaluation of compensation standards, the evaluation of the ability of government to deal with the conflict, the cognition of adopting different behavior patterns, and the value orientation of self-interest and public interest.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B842

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王鵬;汪文件;;非直接利益沖突型群體性事件原因及特點解析[J];長春工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期

2 黃順康;;非直接利益沖突何以成為影響社會穩(wěn)定的重要因素[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2008年05期

3 聶軍;;國際沖突持久與加劇的社會心理學(xué)分析[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

4 姚勝南;;群體性事件中無直接利益沖突現(xiàn)象探析[J];江南論壇;2010年07期

5 王紅蓮;;增強公民有序政治參與意識,減少“無直接利益沖突”矛盾[J];江西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年01期

6 黃建宏;肖顯富;;社會沖突理論啟示群體性突發(fā)事件研究[J];老區(qū)建設(shè);2009年14期

7 鐘玉明;郭奔勝;;社會矛盾新警號[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1987393