本文選題：恐懼消退 + 提取-消退范式　； 參考：《心理學報》2017年03期

【摘要】：情緒障礙治療的關鍵在于消退條件性恐懼記憶,研究證明基于記憶再鞏固的提取-消退范式能有效消除或改寫原有的恐懼記憶。本研究將提取-消退范式應用到更復雜的恐懼記憶中,采用多感官復合刺激(聲音+圖片)作為條件刺激,以皮電反應作為恐懼反應指標,考察采用單個線索(聲音或圖片)、復合線索(聲音+圖片)進行提取-消退對條件性恐懼記憶的消退效果有何差異。結果表明:聲音線索提取-消退組出現(xiàn)了自發(fā)恢復和重建效應,圖片提取-消退組只出現(xiàn)了重建效應,復合刺激提取-消退組未出現(xiàn)自發(fā)恢復和重建效應。說明由復合刺激線索引發(fā)的條件性恐懼,采用復合刺激中的單個較強線索或原有完整線索進行提取-消退,對恐懼記憶的消退效果最好。
[Abstract]:The key to the treatment of emotional disorders lies in the regression of conditional fear memory. It is proved that the abstraction-regression paradigm based on memory re-consolidation can effectively eliminate or rewrite the original fear memory. In this study, the extract-regression paradigm was applied to the more complex fear memory, and the multisensory compound stimulus (sound picture) was used as the conditioned stimulus, and the electrodermal response was used as the fear response index. In this study, we investigated the difference of the regression effect of conditional fear memory by using single cues (voice or picture) and compound cues (sound images). The results showed that the spontaneous recovery and reconstruction effect appeared in the audio cue-regression group, only the reconstruction effect in the picture-subtractive group, and no spontaneous recovery and reconstruction effect in the compound stimulus-subtractive group. The results show that the conditional fear caused by the complex stimulus leads to the best effect on the regression of fear memory by using a single stronger clue or the original complete clue in the compound stimulus to extract and subside.
【作者單位】： 華南師范大學心理學院;廣東廣雅中學;
【基金】：國家自然科學基金項目(31371057) 國家社會科學基金重大項目(14ZDB259) 幸福廣州心理服務與輔導基地資助
【分類號】：B845
，

本文編號：1956483