本文選題：意義維持模型 + 流動(dòng)補(bǔ)償��； 參考：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：意義維持模型認(rèn)為,由于新經(jīng)驗(yàn)的事實(shí)與個(gè)體基于既有信念形成的預(yù)期出現(xiàn)沖突,個(gè)體便體驗(yàn)到意義違背,并驅(qū)使個(gè)體采取自我調(diào)節(jié)策略緩解這種意義違背。本研究試圖從道德領(lǐng)域入手,著眼于流動(dòng)補(bǔ)償?shù)目隙ㄐ?yīng),通過(guò)四項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn)研究,探討意義違背誘發(fā)的道德信念肯定效應(yīng)及其心理機(jī)制。研究一包含2項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn),探討意義違背誘發(fā)的道德信念肯定效應(yīng)。實(shí)驗(yàn)一分別以道德判斷、道德規(guī)范遵守意愿為因變量,探討意義違背操縱對(duì)道德判斷嚴(yán)厲性、道德規(guī)范遵守意愿的影響。實(shí)驗(yàn)一證實(shí),意義違背操縱后,被試將表現(xiàn)出更高水平的道德信念肯定行為,包括將道德行為判斷為更道德,將不道德行為判斷為更不道德,以及更高水平的道德規(guī)范遵守意愿。實(shí)驗(yàn)二以道德關(guān)注為因變量,探討意義違背操縱對(duì)道德關(guān)注的廣度、深度的影響。實(shí)驗(yàn)二發(fā)現(xiàn),意義違背操縱后,被試道德關(guān)注的深度顯著提高,但未發(fā)現(xiàn)道德關(guān)注廣度的顯著差異。研究二包含1項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn),探討既有道德信念在意義違背與道德信念肯定關(guān)系中的調(diào)節(jié)作用。實(shí)驗(yàn)三發(fā)現(xiàn),對(duì)于“關(guān)愛(ài)/傷害”道德基礎(chǔ)認(rèn)同水平高、但“公平/欺騙”道德基礎(chǔ)認(rèn)同水平低的被試,意義違背操縱可以顯著負(fù)向預(yù)測(cè)被試基于“關(guān)愛(ài)/傷害”道德基礎(chǔ)的道德判斷;對(duì)于“關(guān)愛(ài)/傷害”道德基礎(chǔ)認(rèn)同水平低、但“公平/欺騙”道德基礎(chǔ)認(rèn)同水平高的被試,意義違背操縱可以顯著正向預(yù)測(cè)被試基于“公平/欺騙”道德基礎(chǔ)的道德判斷。研究三包含1項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn),探討意義維持動(dòng)機(jī)作為意義違背導(dǎo)致道德信念肯定效應(yīng)的中介機(jī)制。實(shí)驗(yàn)四證實(shí),意義違背操縱后,基于道德視角的行為評(píng)價(jià)會(huì)更嚴(yán)厲、更迅速,而基于個(gè)人視角的行為評(píng)價(jià)任務(wù)中則不存在此效應(yīng)。同時(shí),意義維持動(dòng)機(jī)可以作為意義違背導(dǎo)致道德信念肯定效應(yīng)的中介機(jī)制;意義違背操縱導(dǎo)致更高水平的意義維持動(dòng)機(jī),并導(dǎo)致后續(xù)行為評(píng)價(jià)任務(wù)中的道德信念肯定效應(yīng)。以上四項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn)研究證明,意義違背可以引發(fā)道德信念肯定效應(yīng),個(gè)體通過(guò)道德信念的肯定實(shí)現(xiàn)意義的流動(dòng)補(bǔ)償。個(gè)體的既有道德信念對(duì)上述過(guò)程起到調(diào)節(jié)作用,并且該過(guò)程是通過(guò)意義維持動(dòng)機(jī)的中介作用實(shí)現(xiàn)的。此外,還進(jìn)一步討論了本研究的價(jià)值、不足及未來(lái)發(fā)展方向。
[Abstract]:The meaning maintenance model holds that, because of the conflict between the facts of the new experience and the expectation of the individual based on the formation of existing beliefs, the individual can experience the violation of meaning and drive the individual to take the self-regulation strategy to alleviate the violation. This study tries to study the positive effect of the flow compensation from the moral field and through four experimental studies, This paper discusses the positive effect of moral belief and its psychological mechanism induced by meaning violation. The study includes 2 experiments to explore the positive effect of moral belief that is violated by meaning. Experiment one confirms that after the meaning goes against manipulation, the subjects will show a higher level of moral belief, including the judgment of moral behavior as more moral, the judgment of immoral behavior as more immoral, and the higher level of moral norms. Experiment two found that the depth of moral concern was significantly increased after the meaning was violated, but the significant difference in the extent of moral concern was not found. Study two included 1 experiments to explore the regulatory role of moral beliefs in the relationship between moral convictions and moral beliefs. Experiment three found that "care / harm" was "love / harm". "The moral foundation identification level is high, but the" fair / deceit "moral basic identification level of the low level of the subjects, meaning contrary to the manipulation can significantly negative prediction based on the moral basis of" care / harm "moral basis; for" care / harm "moral basis of the low level of identification, but the" fair / deceit "moral basis of high level of identification is high Trial, meaning breach of manipulation can significantly forward predictive moral judgment based on the moral basis of "fairness / deception". Study three contains 1 experiments to explore the intermediary mechanism of meaning maintenance motivation as the positive effect of moral belief. Experiment four confirms that the moral perspective of behavior evaluation will be stricter after the meaning is contrary to manipulation. The effect does not exist in the individual perspective based behavior evaluation task. At the same time, the meaning maintenance motivation can be used as the intermediary mechanism of meaning violation that leads to the positive effect of moral belief; meaning violation leads to higher level of meaning maintenance motivation and leads to the affirmative effect of moral belief in the evaluation task of follow-up behavior. The above four experimental studies have proved that the breach of meaning can lead to the positive effect of moral belief, and the individual's moral belief is the flow compensation for the affirmative realization of the meaning. The individual's moral belief has a regulating effect on the process, and the process is realized through the intermediary role of meaning maintenance motivation. The value of this study, the lack of future development direction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B842

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王玨;吳明證;孫曉玲;;道德失調(diào)的自我調(diào)節(jié)策略[J];心理科學(xué);2016年06期

2 劉艷麗;陸桂芝;劉勇;;結(jié)構(gòu)需求:概念、測(cè)量及與相關(guān)變量的關(guān)系[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2016年02期

3 左世江;黃旎雯;王芳;蔡攀;;意義維持模型:理論發(fā)展與研究挑戰(zhàn)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2016年01期

4 凌虹;陸愛(ài)桃;連松洲;李文桃;蘇丹曉;;不同情緒對(duì)認(rèn)知失調(diào)沖突的影響研究[J];心理研究;2015年02期

5 張宏偉;李曄;;兩種道德自我調(diào)節(jié)機(jī)制下的道德行為[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2014年07期

6 何W，

本文編號(hào)：1946770